Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (대한심미치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (대한심미치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Porcelain Fracture in Metal Ceramic, All ceramic and Zirconia restoration

금속도재, 전장도재, 지르코니아 수복물에서의 도재 파절

  • Received : 2023.10.25
  • Accepted : 2023.11.07
  • Published : 2023.11.12
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Porcelain fractures associated with metal ceramic(MC), all ceramic (AC), and zirconia restorations are common complications. Several factors of fracture are suggested; Property of materials, Design of the coping for metal ceramic, fabrication techniques, supporting structure, occlusal force, parafunctional habit are being considered. In this article, these factors are discussed in detail.

도자기 파절은 금속도재, 전부도재, 지르코니아 수복물의 흔한 문제점이다. 이와 관련되 여러가지 요소들이 제시되는데, 금속의 물성, 금속도재의 금속 코핑의 형태, 가공 방법, 지지형태, 교하벽, 비기능적 습관들이 포함된다. 이 논문에서는 이런 요소들을 조금더 구체적으로 살펴보고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Goodacre et al. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003
  2. Richard P Kinsel. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Aug;102(2):80
  3. Irena Sailer et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 18 (Suppl. 3), 2007 / 86-96 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01468.x
  4. U Bragger. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 Feb;12(1):26-34. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x
  5. Niklaus P. Lang et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years II. Combined tooth-implant-supported FPDs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 643-653 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01118.x
  6. Bjarni E. Pjetursson et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years I. Implant-supported FPDs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 15, 2004 / 625-642 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x
  7. Bjarni E. Pjetursson et al. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 18 (Suppl. 3), 2007/97-113
  8. Marion E. Kreissl Technical complications of implantsupported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 18, 2007 / 720-726 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01414.x
  9. R.S. Manly, Oral Sensory. Thresholds of persons with natural and artificial dentitions. J.D.Res. June , 1952
  10. R. Jacobs, et al. Role of periodontal ligament receptors in the tactile function of teeth : a review. J Perio Res. 1994:29 153-167 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1994.tb01208.x
  11. Bjarni E. Pjetursson et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: single crowns
  12. Charles J. Goodacre et al. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY May 1999
  13. Irena Sailer et al. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20 (Suppl. 4), 2009
  14. Ronald E. Jung et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 119-130 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
  15. Richard P. Kinsel, Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients : patient -specific and implant -specific predictors of ceramic failure. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2009;101:388-394
  16. Zhenyu Tang et al. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crownsfor posterior teeth restorations. Medicine. 2019 Oct;98
  17. Schriwer C et al. The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns. Dent Mater. 2021 Aug;37(8):e427-e434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.012
  18. Jaana-Sophia Schley et al. Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Oct;118(5):443-50 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00767.x
  19. Sailer I et al. Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):603-23. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011
  20. Pjetursson BE et al. Dent Mater 2015 Jun;31(6):624-39. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013