Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative and Analytical Study of the Evaluation Criteria between G-SEED, Green Building Certification Systems in Korea, and Active House Certification in Europe

친환경 건축물 인증제도인 유럽의 Active House와 국내 녹색건축인증제의 평가항목 비교분석 연구

  • Cha, Ye-Ji (Dept. of Architecture, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Jihyun (Dept. of Architecture, Ewha Womans University)
  • 차예지 (이화여자대학교 대학원 건축설계전공) ;
  • 박지현 (이화여자대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2021.11.28
  • Accepted : 2022.10.18
  • Published : 2022.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The world has been establishing policies that consider the environment whereas the construction industry has created and implemented an eco-friendly building evaluation system. In Korea, the mandatory policy of zero-energy buildings has been established since 2020. Overall, awareness and understanding of the Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design (G-SEED), green architecture, and the environmental certification system are needed. Active House Certification in Europe is a green building certification that has the advantage of being friendly and easy to understand for the public. This study aims to present concepts of environmental certification systems to identify solutions for the active implementation of sustainable features in Korea through the comparison of G-SEED in Korea and Active House Certification in Europe. This study compares, analyzes, and evaluates the evaluation classification system, composition and detailed criteria of Active House certification and G-SEED.

Keywords

References

  1. Active House Alliance. (2020). The Active House Specifications 3rd Edition. Active House. Retrieved July 27, 2022 from https://www.activehouse.info/
  2. Active House Secretariat. (2019). Zemp House. Active House. Retrieved July 27, 2022 from https://www.activehouse.info/cases/zemp-house/
  3. Harmony of Design and Technology. (2019). Zemp House-New Standart Green Community. Retrieved July 27, 2022 from https://zemp.house/
  4. Kim, H. K. (2019). Zero Energy Green Remodeling. Housing and Culture History, 12
  5. Kim, K. H., Koo, S. H., Cho, D. W., & Chae, C. W. (2018). An Improvements of G-SEED Standards by Comparing with BREEAM in the UK, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 34(9), 68.
  6. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology(KICT). (2020). Green Architecture Certification Standard Commentary - New Residential Building 2016-5 v2. Retrieved July 27, 2022 from http://www.gseed.or.kr/greenCommentary.do
  7. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology(KICT). (n.d.). Certification System Overview. G-SEED. Retrieved October 14, 2022 from http://gseed.or.kr/overview.do
  8. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(MOLIT). (2021a). Land and Transportation Carbon Neutral Roadmap. Retrieved October 14, 2022 from http://www.molit.go.kr/
  9. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(MOLIT). (2021b, April 26). [Attachment 1] Criteria for the certification review of new residential buildings (related to Article 3). Green Building Certification Standard. https://www.law.go.kr/
  10. Zimmermann, R. K., Skjelmose, O., Jensen, K. G., Jensen, K. K., & Birgisdottir, H. (2019). Categorizing building certification systems according to the definition of sustainable building. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 471(9).