DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ON FUNCTIONS STARLIKE WITH RESPECT TO n-PLY SYMMETRIC, CONJUGATE AND SYMMETRIC CONJUGATE POINTS

  • Received : 2021.10.01
  • Accepted : 2022.02.22
  • Published : 2022.10.01

Abstract

For given non-negative real numbers 𝛼k with ∑mk=1 𝛼k = 1 and normalized analytic functions fk, k = 1, …, m, defined on the open unit disc, let the functions F and Fn be defined by F(z) := ∑mk=1 𝛼kfk(z), and Fn(z) := n-1n-1j=0 e-2j𝜋i/nF(e2j𝜋i/nz). This paper studies the functions fk satisfying the subordination zf'k(z)/Fn(z) ≺ h(z), where the function h is a convex univalent function with positive real part. We also consider the analogues of the classes of starlike functions with respect to symmetric, conjugate, and symmetric conjugate points. Inclusion and convolution results are proved for these and related classes. Our classes generalize several well-known classes and the connections with the previous works are indicated.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the referee for the comments to improve the readability of the paper.

References

  1. H. S. Al-Amiri, On the Hadamard products of schlicht functions and applications, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 8 (1985), no. 1, 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171285000163
  2. H. Al-Amiri, D. Coman, and P. T. Mocanu, Some properties of starlike functions with respect to symmetric-conjugate points, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 18 (1995), no. 3, 469-474. https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171295000597
  3. R. M. Ali, A. O. Badghaish, and V. Ravichandran, Multivalent functions with respect to n-ply points and symmetric conjugate points, Comput. Math. Appl. 60 (2010), no. 11, 2926-2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.09.053
  4. R. M. Ali, M. N. Mahnaz, V. Ravichandran, and K. G. Subramanian, Convolution properties of classes of analytic and meromorphic functions, J. Inequal. Appl. 2010 (2010), Art. ID 385728, 14 pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/385728
  5. R. W. Barnard and C. Kellogg, Applications of convolution operators to problems in univalent function theory, Michigan Math. J. 27 (1980), no. 1, 81-94. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.mmj/1029002312 1029002312
  6. R. Md. El-Ashwah and D. K. Thomas, Some subclasses of close-to-convex functions, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 2 (1987), no. 1, 85-100.
  7. P. Gochhayat and A. Prajapati, Geometric properties on (j, k)-symmetric functions related to starlike and convex function, Commun. Korean Math. Soc. to appear.
  8. M. S. Kasi, On the radius of univalence of certain regular functions, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 24 (1993), no. 3, 189-191.
  9. S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Differential subordinations, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 225, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2000.
  10. P. T. Mocanu, On starlike functions with respect to symmetric points, in Seminar of geometric function theory, 129-134, Preprint, 82-4, Univ. "Babes-Bolyai", Cluj, 1983.
  11. I. R. Nezhmetdinov and S. Ponnusamy, On the class of univalent functions starlike with respect to N-symmetric points, Hokkaido Math. J. 31 (2002), no. 1, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.14492/hokmj/1350911770
  12. K. S. Padmanabhan and R. Manjini, Certain applications of differential subordination, Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S.) 39(53) (1986), 107-118.
  13. K. S. Padmanabhan and R. Parvatham, Some applications of differential subordination, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 32 (1985), no. 3, 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700002410
  14. K. S. Padmanabhan and J. Thangamani, The effect of certain integral operators on some classes of starlike functions with respect to symmetric points, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. R. S. Roumanie (N.S.) 26(74) (1982), no. 4, 355-360.
  15. V. Ravichandran, Functions starlike with respect to n-ply symmetric, conjugate and symmetric conjugate points, J. Indian Acad. Math. 26 (2004), no. 1, 35-45.
  16. V. Ravichandran, Starlike and convex functions with respect to conjugate points, Acta Math. Acad. Paedagog. Nyh'azi. (N.S.) 20 (2004), no. 1, 31-37.
  17. S. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (1975), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/2039801
  18. S. Ruscheweyh, Convolutions in geometric function theory, Seminaire de Mathematiques Superieures, 83, Presses de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, 1982.
  19. S. Ruscheweyh and T. Sheil-Small, Hadamard products of Schlicht functions and the P'olya-Schoenberg conjecture, Comment. Math. Helv. 48 (1973), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02566116
  20. K. B. Sakaguchi, On a certain univalent mapping, J. Math. Soc. Japan 11 (1959), 72-75. https://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/01110072
  21. T. N. Shanmugam, Convolution and differential subordination, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 12 (1989), no. 2, 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171289000384
  22. T. N. Shanmugam, C. Ramachandran, and V. Ravichandran, Fekete-Szego problem for subclasses of starlike functions with respect to symmetric points, Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 43 (2006), no. 3, 589-598. https://doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.2006.43.3.589
  23. J. Stankiewicz, Some remarks on functions starlike with respect to symmetric points, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sk lodowska Sect. A 19 (1965), 53-59 (1970).