DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic parameter analysis of reproductive traits in Large White pigs

  • Yu, Guanghui (College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Chuduan (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Yuan (College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2022.03.24
  • Accepted : 2022.07.04
  • Published : 2022.11.01

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the genetic parameters for reproductive traits among Large White pigs, including the following traits: total number born (TNB), number born alive (NBA), litter birth weight (LBW), average birth weight (ABW), gestation length (GL), age at first service (AFS) and age at first farrowing (AFF). Methods: The dataset consisted of 19,036 reproductive records from 4,986 sows, and a multi-trait animal model was used to estimate genetic variance components of seven reproductive traits. Results: The heritability estimates for these reproductive traits ranged from 0.09 to 0.26, with the highest heritability for GL and AFF, and the lowest heritability for NBA. The repeatabilities for TNB, NBA, LWB, ABW, and GL were ranged from 0.16 to 0.34. Genetic and phenotypic correlations ranged from -0.41 to 0.99, and -0.34 to 0.98, respectively. In particular, the correlations between TNB, NBA and LBW, between AFS and AFF, exhibited a strong positive correlation. Furthermore, for TNB, NBA, LBW, ABW, and GL, genetic correlations of the same trait between different parities were moderately to strongly correlated (0.32 to 0.97), and the correlations of adjacent parities were higher than those of nonadjacent parities. Conclusion: All the results in the present study can be used as a basis for the genetic assessment of the target population. In the formulation of dam line selection index, AFS or AFF can be considered to combine with TNB in a multiple trait swine breeding value estimation system. Moreover, breeders are encouraged to increase the proportion of sows at parity 3-5 and reinforce the management of sows at parity 1 and parity ≥8.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge our colleagues at Qingdao Agricultural University and China Agricultural University, for their technical assistance and helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Onteru SK, Fan B, Du ZQ, Garrick DJ, Stalder KJ, Rothschild MF. A whole-genome association study for pig reproductive traits. Anim Genet 2012;43:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02213.x
  2. Zhang T, Wang L, Shi H, et al. Hritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of litter uniformity and litter size in Large White sows. J Integr Agric 2016;15:848-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61155-8
  3. Gao Y, Cao J, Zhang S, Zhang Q, Sun D. Short communication: Heritability estimates for susceptibility to Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infection in Chinese Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:7274-9. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13264
  4. Ali BM, Bastiaansen JWM, de Mey Y, Oude Lansink AGJM. Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers. J Anim Sci 2019;97:156-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky400
  5. Ibanez-Escriche N, Magallon E, Gonzalez E, Tejeda JF, Noguera JL. Genetic parameters and crossbreeding effects of fat deposition and fatty acid profiles in Iberian pig lines. J Anim Sci 2016;94:28-37. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9433
  6. Darfouroduro KA, Naazie A, Ahunu BK, Aboagye GS. Genetic parameter estimates of growth traits of indigenous pigs in Northern Ghana. Livest Sci 2009;125:187-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.04.007
  7. Akanno EC, Schenkel FS, Quinton VM, Friendship RM, Robinson JAB. Meta-analysis of genetic parameter estimates for reproduction, growth and carcass traits of pigs in the tropics. Livest Sci 2013;152:101-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.07.021
  8. Li X, Jiang B, Wang X, Liu X, Zhang Q, Chen Y. Estimation of genetic parameters and season effects for semen traits in three pig breeds of South China. J Anim Breed Genet 2019;136:183-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12393
  9. Zhang S, Zhang J, Olasege BS, et al. Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in connectedness groups of Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire pigs in China. J Anim Breed Genet 2020;137:211-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12431
  10. Oh SH, Lee DH, See MT. Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits between first and later parities in pig. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2006;19:7-12. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.7
  11. Ye J, Tan C, Hu X, Wang A, Wu Z. Genetic parameters for reproductive traits at different parities in Large White pigs. J Anim Sci 2018;96:1215-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky066
  12. Roehe R, Kennedy BW. Estimation of genetic parameters for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and Landrace swine with each parity of farrowing treated as a different trait. J Anim Sci 1995;73:2959-70. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73102959x
  13. Lopez BIM, Seo K. Genetic parameters for litter traits at different parities in purebred Landrace and Yorkshire pigs. Anim Sci J 2019;90:1497-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13298
  14. Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis B, Thompson R, Butler D. ASReml user guide release 3.0. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International Ltd; 2009.
  15. Klei B, Tsuruta S. Approximate variance for heritability estimates. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; 2008.
  16. Shen JY, Yu Y, Wang X, et al. Factors analysis and genetic parameter estimation of female reproductive traits in pigs. Yi Chuan 2012;34:591-6. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1005.2012.00591
  17. Takai Y, Koketsu Y. Number of services and the reservice intervals in relation to suboptimal reproductive performance in female pigs on commercial farms. Livest Sci 2008;114:42-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.04.007
  18. Wu Y, Zhao J, Xu C, et al. Progress towards pig nutrition in the last 27 years. J Sci Food Agric 2020;100:5102-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9095
  19. Thekkoot DM, Kemp RA, Rothschild MF, Plastow GS, Dekkers JCM. Estimation of genetic parameters for traits associated with reproduction, lactation, and efficiency in sows. J Anim Sci 2016;94:4516-29. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0255
  20. Chen P, Baas TJ, Mabry JW, Koehler KJ, Dekkers JCM. Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs. J Anim Sci 2003;81:46-53. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81146x
  21. Wolf J, Zakova E, Groeneveld E. Within-litter variation of birth weight in hyperprolific Czech Large White sows and its relation to litter size traits, stillborn piglets and losses until weaning. Livest Sci 2008;115:195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.07.009
  22. Hollema BL, Zwiers S, Hermesch S. Genetic parameters for haemoglobin levels in sows and piglets as well as sow reproductive performance and piglet survival. Animal 2020;14: 688-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002532
  23. Kaufmann D, Hofer A, Bidanel JP, Kunzi N. Genetic parameters for individual birth and weaning weight and for litter size of Large White pigs. J Anim Breed Genet 2000;117:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2000.00238.x
  24. Hanenberg EHAT, Knol EF, Merks JWM. Estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs. Livest Prod Sci 2001;69:179-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00258-X
  25. Holm B, Bakken M, Klemetsdal G, Vangen O. Genetic correlations between reproduction and production traits in swine. J Anim Sci 2004;82:3458-64. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82123458x
  26. Schneider JF, Rempel LA, Rohrer GA. Genome-wide association study of swine farrowing traits. Part I: genetic and genomic parameter estimates. J Anim Sci 2012;90:3353-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4729
  27. Holm B, Bakken M, Vangen O, Rekaya R. Genetic analysis of age at first service, return rate, litter size, and weaning-tofirst service interval of gilts and sows. J Anim Sci 2005;83: 41-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83141x