DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fatigue performance evaluation of reinforced concrete element: Efficient numerical and SWOT analysis

  • Saiful Islam, A.B.M. (Department of Civil & Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.28
  • 심사 : 2022.08.27
  • 발행 : 2022.10.25

초록

Due to the scarcity of extortionate experimental data, fatigue failure of the reinforced concrete (RC) element might be achieved economically adopting nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis as an alternative approach. However, conventional implicit dynamic analysis is expensive, quasi-static method overlooks interaction effects and inertia, direct cyclic analysis computes stabilized responses. Apart from this, explicit dynamic analysis may provide a numerical operating system for factual long-term responses. The study explores the fatigue behavior based on a simplified explicit dynamic solution employing nonlinear time domain analysis. Among fourteen RC beams, one beam is selected to validate under static loading, one under fatigue with the experimental study and other twelve to check the detail fatigue behavior. The SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats) analysis has been carried out to pinpoint the detail scenario in the adoption of numerical approach as an alternative to the experimental study. Excellent agreement of FE and experimental results is seen. The 3D nonlinear RC beam model at service fatigue limits is truthful to be used as an expedient contrivance to envisage the precise fatigue behavior. The simplified analysis approach for RC beam under fatigue offers savings in computation to predict responses providing acceptable accuracy rather than the complicated laboratory investigation. At higher frequency, the flexural failure occurs a bit earlier gradually compared to the repeated loading case of lower frequency. The deflection increases by 6%-10% at the end of first cycle for beams with increasing frequency of cyclic loading. However, at the end of fatigue loading, greater deflection occur earlier for higher load range because of more rapid stiffness degradation. For higher frequency, a slight boost in concrete compressive strains at an initial stage of loading has been seen indicating somewhat stepper increment. Stiffness degradation in larger loading cycle at same duration escalates the upsurge of the rate of strain in case of higher frequency.

키워드

과제정보

The authors are thankful to the Project 2017-212-Eng, Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Saudi Arabia for assisting in the study.

참고문헌

  1. ACI Committe 215R (1997), ACI 215R:1992 (R1997): Considerations for Design of Concrete Structures Subjected to Fatigue Loading, ACI Journal Proceedings, American Concrete Institute.
  2. ACI Committee 318 (2014), ACI 318-14: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute.
  3. Al-Rousan, R. and Issa, M. (2011), "Fatigue performance of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheets", Constr. Build. Mater., 25(8), 3520-3529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.045.
  4. Ansari, M., Jeddi, M.Z., Badaruzzaman, W.H.W., Tahir, M.M., Osman, S.A. and Hosseinpour, E. (2021), "A numerical investigation on the through rib stiffener beam to concrete-filled steel tube column connections subjected to cyclic loading", Eng. Sci. Technol., 24(3), 728-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.10.004.
  5. Aslani, F. and Jowkarmeimandi, R. (2012), "Stress-strain model for concrete under cyclic loading", Mag. Concrete Res., 64(8), 673-685. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.11.00120.
  6. ASTM A615/A615M-20 (2020). Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
  7. ASTM C39/C39M-20 (2020), Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM C39/C39M-20, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  8. Ayhan, A.O. and Demir, O. (2021), "Computational modeling of three-dimensional mixed mode-I/II/III fatigue crack growth problems and experiments", Comput. Struct., 243, 106399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106399.
  9. Badawi, M. and Soudki, K. (2009), "Fatigue behavior of RC beams strengthened with NSM CFRP rods", J. Compos. Constr., 13(5), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:5(415).
  10. Beesley, R., Chen, H. and Hughes, M. (2017), "A novel simulation for the design of a low cycle fatigue experimental testing programme", Comput. Struct., 178, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.09.004.
  11. Bell, G.G. and Rochford, L. (2016), "Rediscovering SWOT's integrative nature: A new understanding of an old framework", Int. J. Manage. Edu., 14(3), 310-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.06.003.
  12. BS EN 12390-2:2019 (2019), Testing Hardened Concrete, Making and Curing Specimens for Strength Tests, BSI.
  13. BS EN 12390-5:2019 (2019), Testing Hardened Concrete, Flexural Strength of Test Specimens, BSI.
  14. Ferdous, W., Manalo, A., Peauril, J., Salih, C., Raghava Reddy, K., Yu, P., Schubel, P. and Heyer, T. (2020), "Testing and modelling the fatigue behaviour of GFRP composites-Effect of stress level, stress concentration and frequency", Eng. Sci. Technol., 23(5), 1223-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.01.001.
  15. Georgioudakis, M., Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2017), "Probabilistic shape design optimization of structural components under fatigue", Comput. Struct., 182, 252-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.12.008.
  16. Hawileh, R.A. (2012), "Nonlinear finite element modeling of RC beams strengthened with NSM FRP rods", Constr. Build. Mater., 27(1), 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.018.
  17. Hibbitt, K. (2007), ABAQUS Version 6. 7: Theory Manual, Users' Manual, Verification Man UAL and Example Problems Manual, Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorenson Inc.
  18. Holopainen, S. and Barriere, T. (2018), "Modeling of mechanical behavior of amorphous solids undergoing fatigue loadings, with application to polymers", Comput. Struct., 199, 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.01.010.
  19. Hosen, M.A., Jumaat, M.Z., Alengaram, U.J., Sulong, N.H.R. and Islam, A.B.M. S. (2019), "Structural performance of lightweight concrete beams strengthened with side-externally bonded reinforcement (S-EBR) technique using CFRP fabrics", Compos. Part B: Eng., 176, 107323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107323.
  20. Hosen, M.A., Jumaat, M.Z., Islam, A.B.M.S., Darain, K.M.U. and Rahman, M.M. (2016), "Flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by a new side near-surface mounted technique using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer bars: Experimental and analytical investigation", Sci. Adv. Mater., 8(4), 726-740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/sam.2016.2656.
  21. Hu, H.T., Lin, F.M. and Jan, Y.Y. (2004), "Nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by fiber-reinforced plastics", Compos. Struct., 63(3), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00174-0.
  22. Huang, Y., Chen, S. and Gu, P. (2022), "Numerical analysis on fatigue behavior of ultrahigh-performance concrete-Orthotropic steel composite bridge deck", Adv. Struct. Eng., 25(6), 1151-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332211064663.
  23. Huda, M.N., Jumat, M.Z.B., Islam, A.B.M.S., Darain, K.M.U., Obaydullah, M. and Hosen, M.A. (2017), "Palm oil industry's bi-products as coarse aggregate in structural lightweight concrete", Comput. Concrete, 19(5), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.5.515.
  24. Islam, A. and Al-Kutti, W. A. (2018), "Seismic response variation of multistory base-isolated buildings applying lead rubber bearings", Comput. Concrete, 21(5), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.5.495.
  25. Islam, A. B. M. S. (2020), "Computer aided failure prediction of reinforced concrete beam", Comput. Concrete, 25(1), 67-73. http://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.25.1.067.
  26. Jiang, R., Mao, C., Hou, L., Wu, C. and Tan, J. (2018), "A SWOT analysis for promoting off-site construction under the backdrop of China's new urbanisation", J. Clean. Prod., 173, 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.147.
  27. Larrosa, N.O., Chaves, V., Navarro, A. and Ainsworth, R.A. (2017), "Application of the Microstructural Finite Element Alternating Method to assess the impact of specimen size and distributions of contact/residual stress fields on fatigue strength", Comput. Struct., 179, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.10.011.
  28. Leitner, M., Pauer, P., Kainzinger, P. and Eichlseder, W. (2017), "Numerical effects on notch fatigue strength assessment of non-welded and welded components", Comput. Struct., 191, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.06.009.
  29. Li, C.Z., Hong, J., Xue, F., Shen, G.Q., Xu, X. and Luo, L. (2016), "SWOT analysis and Internet of Things-enabled platform for prefabrication housing production in Hong Kong", Habitat Int., 57, 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.002.
  30. Long, X.Y., Jiang, C., Liu, K., Han, X., Gao, W. and Li, B.C. (2018), "An interval analysis method for fatigue crack growth life prediction with uncertainty", Comput. Struct., 210, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.09.005.
  31. Maekawa, K., Okamura, H. and Pimanmas, A. (2003), Non-Linear Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete, CRC Press.
  32. Milasinovic, D.D. and Landovic, A. (2018), "Rheological-dynamical analogy for analysis of vibrations and low cycle fatigue in internally damped inelastic frame structures", Comput. Struct., 196, 76-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.11.001.
  33. Moss, D.S. (1982), "Bending fatigue of high-yield reinforcing bars in concrete", TRRL Supplementary Rep. No. 748.
  34. Murali, G., Indhumathi, T., Karthikeyan, K. and Ramkumar, V. (2018), "Analysis of flexural fatigue failure of concrete made with 100% coarse recycled and natural aggregates", Comput. Concrete, 21(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.3.291.
  35. Nasiri, A. and Shimozato, T. (2021), "Durability of preflex beam under cyclic loading", Eng. Sci. Technol., 24(6), 1361-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.03.003.
  36. Pancic, A., Milasinovic, D.D. and Goles, D. (2021), "Crack propagation in flexural fatigue of concrete using rheological-dynamical theory", Comput. Concrete, 27(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.27.1.055.
  37. Rahman, M.M., Jumaat, M.Z. and Islam, A.B.M.S. (2017), "Weight minimum design of concrete beam strengthened with glass fiber reinforced polymer bar using genetic algorithm", Comput. Concrete, 19(2), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.2.127.
  38. Saribiyik, A., Abodan, B. and Balci, M.T. (2021), "Experimental study on shear strengthening of RC beams with basalt FRP strips using different wrapping methods", Eng. Sci. Technol., 24(1), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.06.003.
  39. Sarkani, S., Michaelov, G., Kihl, D.P. and Bonanni, D.L. (2001), "Comparative study of nonlinear damage accumulation models in stochastic fatigue of FRP laminates", J. Struct. Eng., 127(3), 314-322. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(314).
  40. Sasaki, K.K., Paret, T., Araiza, J.C. and Hals, P. (2010), "Failure of concrete T-beam and box-girder highway bridges subjected to cyclic loading from traffic", Eng. Struct., 32(7), 1838-1845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.006.
  41. Wang, J., Chen, X., Wu, C., Shi, Z. and Cheng, X. (2022), "Experimental study on fracture behavior of SCC pavement slab containing crumb rubber under cyclic loading", Comput. Concrete, 29(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2022.29.1.047.
  42. Wang, X.H., Gao, Y., Gao, R.D., Wang, J. and Liu, X.L. (2017), "Influence of different fatigue loads and coating thicknesses on service performance of RC beam specimens with epoxy-coated reinforcement", Comput. Concrete, 19(3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.243.
  43. Yang, D.Y. and Frangopol, D.M. (2018), "Probabilistic optimization framework for inspection/repair planning of fatigue-critical details using dynamic Bayesian networks", Comput. Struct., 198, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.01.006.