The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제14권5호
  • /
  • Pages.324-333
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Translucency and masking ability of translucent zirconia; comparison with conventional zirconia and lithium disilicate

  • 투고 : 2022.05.30
  • 심사 : 2022.10.17
  • 발행 : 2022.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate translucency and masking ability of translucent zirconia compared to conventional zirconia and lithium disilicate materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three types of zirconia blocks with different yttria contents (3Y, 4Y, 5.5Y) and LS blocks (Rosetta SM) were used. Ten specimens for each group were fabricated with 10 mm diameter, with both 0.8 mm and 1.5 mm thicknesses (± 0.02 mm). All groups of zirconia specimens were sintered and polished according to the manufacturer's instructions. To calculate the translucency parameter (TP), CIELAB value was measured with a spectrophotometer on black and white backgrounds. To investigate the color masking abilities, background shades of A2, normal dentin, discolored dentin, and titanium were used. The color difference (ΔE) was calculated with the CIELAB values of A2 shade background as a reference compared with the values in the various backgrounds. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were conducted (P < .05). RESULTS. The TP values of zirconia specimens increased as the yttria content increased. All materials used in the study were able to adequately mask normal dentin shade (ΔE < 5.5), but were incapable of masking severely discolored dentin (ΔE > 5.5). On the titanium background, all materials of 1.5 mm thickness were able to mask the background shade, but with a thickness of 0.8 mm, only 3Y-TZP and 4Y-PSZ were able to mask titanium background. CONCLUSION. All zirconia materials and lithium disilicate specimens used in this study were unable to adequately mask the shade of severely discolored dentin. It is recommended to use 3Y-TZP or 4Y-PSZ with a sufficient thickness of 0.8 mm or more to mask titanium.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lumkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int 2017;48:369-80.
  2. Christensen GJ. Choosing an all-ceramic restorative material: porcelain-fused-to-metal or zirconia-based? J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:662-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0239
  3. Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: Part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:130-51.
  4. Shahmiri R, Standard OC, Hart JN, Sorrell CC. Optical properties of zirconia ceramics for esthetic dental restorations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.009
  5. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
  6. Stawarczyk B, Frevert K, Ender A, Roos M, Sener B, Wimmer T. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: Contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;59:128-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.040
  7. Stawarczyk B, Emslander A, Roos M, Sener B, Noack F, Keul C. Zirconia ceramics, their contrast ratio and grain size depending on sintering parameters. Dent Mater J 2014;33:591-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-056
  8. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lumkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int 2017;48:441-50.
  9. Church TD, Jessup JP, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Translucency and strength of high-translucency monolithic zirconium oxide materials. Gen Dent 2017;65:48-52.
  10. Suputtamongkol K, Tulapornchai C, Mamani J, Kamchatphai W, Thongpun N. Effect of the shades of background substructures on the overall color of zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:319-25. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.319
  11. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018
  12. Della Bona A, Nogueira AD, Pecho OE. Optical properties of CAD-CAM ceramic systems. J Dent 2014;42:1202-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.005
  13. Bayindir F, Koseoglu M. The effect of restoration thickness and resin cement shade on the color and translucency of a high-translucency monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:149-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.002
  14. Huh YH, Yang EC, Park CJ, Cho LR. In vitro evaluation of the polishing effect and optical properties of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:994-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.015
  15. Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE, Nejat AH, Burgess JO. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:132-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.004
  16. Elsayed A, Meyer G, Wille S, Kern M. Influence of the yttrium content on the fracture strength of monolithic zirconia crowns after artificial aging. Quintessence Int 2019;50:344-8.
  17. Carrabba M, Keeling AJ, Aziz A, Vichi A, Fabian Fonzar R, Wood D, Ferrari M. Translucent zirconia in the ceramic scenario for monolithic restorations: A flexural strength and translucency comparison test. J Dent 2017;60:70-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.03.002
  18. Patel N. Effect of Different Implant Abutment Materials on Optical Properties of Translucent Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. Marquette University; Master of Science (MS), 2019.
  19. Zhang F, Inokoshi M, Batuk M, Hadermann J, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B, Vleugels J. Strength, toughness and aging stability of highly-translucent Y-TZP ceramics for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2016;32:e327-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.025
  20. Arif R, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM. In vitro color stainability and relative translucency of CAD-CAM restorative materials used for laminate veneers and complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:160-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.011
  21. Lee YK. Criteria for clinical translucency evaluation of direct esthetic restorative materials. Restor Dent Endod 2016;41:159-66. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.159
  22. Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79-86.
  23. Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, Lebeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60004-8
  24. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  25. Jiang L, Liao Y, Wan Q, Li W. Effects of sintering temperature and particle size on the translucency of zirconium dioxide dental ceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2011;22:2429-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4438-9
  26. Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014;30:1195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.375
  27. Alraheam IA, Donovan T, Boushell L, Cook R, Ritter AV, Sulaiman TA. Fracture load of two thicknesses of different zirconia types after fatiguing and thermocycling. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:635-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.012
  28. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60333-9
  29. Yan J, Kaizer MR, Zhang Y. Load-bearing capacity of lithium disilicate and ultra-translucent zirconias. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;88:170-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.023
  30. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350802577818
  31. Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R, Liu R, Ma S, Zhou Z, Longquan S. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;35:93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.014
  32. Fabbri G, Mancini R, Marinelli V, Ban G. Anterior discolored teeth restored with Procera all-ceramic restorations: a clinical evaluation of the esthetic outcome based on the thickness of the core selected. Eur J Esthet Dent 2011;6:76-86.
  33. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter AV, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO, Lassila LV. Optical Properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater 2015;31:1180-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.016
  34. ISO 6872. Dentistry-Ceramic materials. International Standard Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2008.
  35. Gomez-Polo C, Montero J, Gomez-Polo M, Martin Casado A. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE 2000 Color Difference Formulas on Gingival Color Space. J Prosthodont 2020;29:401-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12717