DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consistency check algorithm for validation and re-diagnosis to improve the accuracy of abnormality diagnosis in nuclear power plants

  • Kim, Geunhee (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Jae Min (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Shin, Ji Hyeon (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Seung Jun (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2022.02.07
  • Accepted : 2022.05.30
  • Published : 2022.10.25

Abstract

The diagnosis of abnormalities in a nuclear power plant is essential to maintain power plant safety. When an abnormal event occurs, the operator diagnoses the event and selects the appropriate abnormal operating procedures and sub-procedures to implement the necessary measures. To support this, abnormality diagnosis systems using data-driven methods such as artificial neural networks and convolutional neural networks have been developed. However, data-driven models cannot always guarantee an accurate diagnosis because they cannot simulate all possible abnormal events. Therefore, abnormality diagnosis systems should be able to detect their own potential misdiagnosis. This paper proposes a rulebased diagnostic validation algorithm using a previously developed two-stage diagnosis model in abnormal situations. We analyzed the diagnostic results of the sub-procedure stage when the first diagnostic results were inaccurate and derived a rule to filter the inconsistent sub-procedure diagnostic results, which may be inaccurate diagnoses. In a case study, two abnormality diagnosis models were built using gated recurrent units and long short-term memory cells, and consistency checks on the diagnostic results from both models were performed to detect any inconsistencies. Based on this, a re-diagnosis was performed to select the label of the second-best value in the first diagnosis, after which the diagnosis accuracy increased. That is, the model proposed in this study made it possible to detect diagnostic failures by the developed consistency check of the sub-procedure diagnostic results. The consistency check process has the advantage that the operator can review the results and increase the diagnosis success rate by performing additional re-diagnoses. The developed model is expected to have increased applicability as an operator support system in terms of selecting the appropriate AOPs and sub-procedures with re-diagnosis, thereby further increasing abnormal event diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) using a financial resource granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) of the Republic of Korea (No. 2106007) and also by Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government (MOTIE) (No. 20211510100020, Development of operation supporting technology based on artificial intelligence for nuclear power plant start up and shutdown operation).

References

  1. M.J. Embrechts, S. Benedek, Hybrid identification of nuclear power plant transients with artificial neural networks, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 51 (3) (2004) 686-693. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2004.824874
  2. S. Lee, P. Seong, A dynamic neural network based accident diagnosis advisory system for nuclear power plants, Prog. Nucl. Energy 46 (3e4) (2005) 268e281.
  3. J. Park, W. Jung, A systematic framework to investigate the coverage of abnormal operating procedures in nuclear power plants, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138 (2015) 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.013
  4. M. Horiguchi, N. Fukawa, K. Nishimura, Development of nuclear power plant diagnosis technique using neural networks, in: Proceedings of theFirst International Forum on Applications of Neural Networks to Power Systems, IEEE, 1991, pp. 279-282.
  5. B. Lu, B.R. Upadhyaya, "Monitoring and fault diagnosis fo the steam generator system of a nuclear power plant using data-driven modeling and residual space analysis," Ann. Nucl. Energy, Volume 32, Issue 9, pp.897-912.
  6. T.V. Santosh, G. Vinod, R.K. Saraf, A.K. Ghosh, H.S. Kushwaha, Application of artificial neural networks to nuclear power plant transient diagnosis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 (10) (2007) 1468-1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.009
  7. T.V. Santosh, A. Srivastava, V.V.S. Sanyasi Rao, A.K. Ghosh, H.S. Kushwaha, Diagnostic system for identification of accident scenarios in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (3) (2009) 759-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.08.005
  8. S. Seker, E. Ayaz, E. Turkcan, Elman's recurrent neural network applications to condition monitoring in nuclear power plant and rotating machinery, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 16 (2003). Issues 7-8.
  9. M. Claudio, S. Rocco, Enrico Zio, A support vector machine integrated system for the classification of operation anomalies in nuclear components and systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 (5) (2007) 593-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.02.003
  10. J. Galbally, D. Galbally, A pattern recognition approach based on DTW for automatic transient identification in nuclear power plants, Ann. Nucl. Energy 81 (2015) 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.03.003
  11. Silvia Toloa, Xiange Tian, Nils Bausch, Victor Becerra, T.V. Santhosh, G. Vinod, Edoardo Patelli, Robust on-line diagnosis tool for the early accident detection in nuclear power plants, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 186 (2019) 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.015
  12. Jianping Ma, Jin Jiang, Applications of fault detection and diagnosis methods in nuclear powerplants: a review, Prog. Nucl. Energy 53 (2011) 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2010.12.001
  13. A. Ayodeji, Y. Liu, H. Xia, Knowledge base operator support system for nuclear power plant fault diagnosis, Prog. Nucl. Energy 105 (2018) 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.12.013
  14. B.S. Peng, H. Xia, Y.K. Liu, B. Yang, D. Guo, S.M. Zhu, Research on intelligent fault diagnosis method for nuclear power plant based on correlation analysis and deep belief network, Prog. Nucl. Energy 108 (2018) 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.06.003
  15. Gyumin Lee, Seung Jun Lee, Changyong Lee, A convolutional neural network model for abnormality diagnosis in a nuclear power plant, Appl. Soft Comput. 99 (2021), 106874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106874
  16. J.M. Kim, G. Lee, C. Lee, S.J. Lee, Abnormality diagnosis model for nuclear power plants using two-stage gated recurrent units, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (9) (2020) 2009-2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.02.002
  17. John C. Knight, Safety Critical Systems: Challenges and Directions", ICSE '02: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2002, pp. 547-550.
  18. 3KEYMASTER Simulator 2013, Western Service Corporation, Frederick, MD, USA.
  19. Rui Fu, Zuo Zhang, Li Li, Using LSTM and GRU Neural Network Methods for Traffic Flow Prediction", 31st Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation, YAC), 2016.
  20. Y. Bengio, Y. Grandvalet, No unbiased estimator of the variance of k-fold cross-validation, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5 (2004) 1089-1105.
  21. J.M. Kim, S.J. Lee, Framework of Two-Level Operation Module for Autonomous System of Nuclear Power Plants during Startup and Shutdown Operation", KNS-2019, Korean Nuclear Society, 2019.