DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preliminary study of artificial intelligence-based fuel-rod pattern analysis of low-quality tomographic image of fuel assembly

  • Seong, Saerom (Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Sehwan (Department of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ahn, Jae Joon (Division of Data Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Hyung-joo (Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chung, Yong Hyun (Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • You, Sei Hwan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Yeom, Yeon Soo (Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Hyun Joon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Min, Chul Hee (Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2022.01.08
  • Accepted : 2022.05.13
  • Published : 2022.10.25

Abstract

Single-photon emission computed tomography is one of the reliable pin-by-pin verification techniques for spent-fuel assemblies. One of the challenges with this technique is to increase the total fuel assembly verification speed while maintaining high verification accuracy. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm-based tomographic image analysis technique for partial-defect verification of fuel assemblies. With the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation technique, a tomographic image dataset consisting of 511 fuel-rod patterns of a 3 × 3 fuel assembly was generated, and with these images, the VGG16, GoogLeNet, and ResNet models were trained. According to an evaluation of these models for different training dataset sizes, the ResNet model showed 100% pattern estimation accuracy. And, based on the different tomographic image qualities, all of the models showed almost 100% pattern estimation accuracy, even for low-quality images with unrecognizable fuel patterns. This study verified that an AI model can be effectively employed for accurate and fast partial-defect verification of fuel assemblies.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2021R1I1A1A01059875), the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) using financial resources granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) of the Republic of Korea (No. 2101073), the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. G032579811).

References

  1. D. Sweeney, Additional Detection Techniques under Development, Spent Nuclear Fuel Safeguards, Texas A&M University, Nuclear Security and Safeguards Education Portal, 2017, p. 35, chap. "Safeguards".
  2. I.A.E.A. International, Safeguards in the Design of Facilities for Long Term Spent Fuel Management, IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES, 2018, pp. 10-42. NF-T-3.1.
  3. M. Zendel, IAEA safeguards equipment, Int. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 4 (1) (2008) 72-80.
  4. T. Honkamaa, A. Turunen, F. Levai, M. Larsson, R. Berndt, A. LeBrun, Prototype Tomographic Partial Defect Tester, 2006. No. IAEA-CN-148).
  5. T. Honkamaa, A. Turunen, F. Levai, M. Larsson, R. Berndt, A. LeBrun, Prototype tomographic partial defect tester: project status update, in: Proceedings of an International Safeguards Symposium on Addressing Verification Challenges, Posters, 2007.
  6. T. Honkamaa, F. Levai, A. Turunen, R. Berndt, S. Vaccaro, P. Schwalbach, A Prototype for passive gamma emission tomography, in: IAEA Symposium on International Safeguards: Linking Strategy, Implementation and People, Vienna, 2014.
  7. S. Holcombe, S.J. Svard, L. Hallstadius, A Novel gamma emission tomography instrument for enhanced fuel characterization capabilities within the OECD Halden Reactor Project, Ann. Nucl. Energy 85 (2015) 837e845.
  8. E.L. Smith, S. Jacobsson, V. Mozin, P. Jansson, E. Miller, T. Honkamaa, et al., Viability Study of Gamma Emission Tomography for Spent Fuel Verification: JNT 1955 Phase I Technical Report, 2016.
  9. E.A. Miller, L.E. Smith, R.S. Wittman, L.W. Campbell, N. Deshmukh, M.A. Zalavadia, et al., Hybrid Gama Emission Tomography (HGET): FY16 Annual Report NO. PNNL-26213, Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), 2017. Richland, WA United States.
  10. H.J. Choi, I.S. Kang, K.B. Kim, Y.H. Chung, C.H. Min, Optimization of singlephoton emission computed tomography system for fast verification of spent fuel assembly: a Monte Carlo study, J. Instrum. 14 (2019) T07002, 07.
  11. S.H. Choi, H.J. Choi, C.H. Min, Y.H. Chung, J.J. Ahn, Development of de-noised image reconstruction technique using Convolutional AutoEncoder for fast monitoring of fuel assemblies, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (3) (2021) 888-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.08.020
  12. M.D. Zeiler, R. Fergus, Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks, Computer Vision-ECCV, 2014, pp. 818-833.
  13. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G.E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (2012) 1097-1105.
  14. K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, 2014, p. 1556, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.
  15. C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, et al., Going deeper with convolutions, IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn. (2015) 1-9.
  16. L. Wang, C.Y. Lee, Z. Tu, S. Lazebnik, Training Deeper Convolutional Networks with Deep Supervision, 2015, 02496 arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.
  17. C.Y. Lee, S. Xie, P. Gallagher, Z. Zhang, Z. Tu, Deeply-supervised nets, Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Stat. (2015) 562-570.
  18. S. Targ, D. Almeida, K. Lyman, Resnet in Resnet: Generalizing Residual Architectures, 2016, 08029 arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.