DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DED Interaction of FADD and Caspase-8 in the Induction of Apoptotic Cell Death

  • Park, Young-Hoon (Department of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Han, Chang Woo (Department of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Mi Suk (Department of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jang, Se Bok (Department of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2022.06.06
  • Accepted : 2022.07.19
  • Published : 2022.08.28

Abstract

Fas-associated death domain (FADD) is an adapter molecule that bridges the interaction between receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1) and aspartate-specific cysteine protease-8 (caspase-8). As the primary mediator of apoptotic cell death, caspase-8 has two N-terminal death-effector domains (DEDs) and it interacts with other proteins in the DED subfamily through several conserved residues. In the tumor necrosis receptor-1 (TNFR-1)-dependent signaling pathway, apoptosis is triggered by the caspase-8/FADD complex by stimulating receptor internalization. However, the molecular mechanism of complex formation by the DED proteins remains poorly understood. Here, we found that direct DED-DED interaction between FADD and caspase-8 and the structure-based mutations (Y8D/I128A, E12A/I128A, E12R/I128A, K39A/I128A, K39D/I128A, F122A/I128A, and L123A/I128A) of caspase-8 disrupted formation of the stable DED complex with FADD. Moreover, the monomeric crystal structure of the caspase-8 DEDs (F122A/I128A) was solved at 1.7 Å. This study will provide new insight into the interaction mechanism and structural characteristics between FADD and caspase-8 DED subfamily proteins.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Diffraction data were collected at the Pohang Light Source (PLS-7A), Republic of Korea. This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2018R1D1A1B07043701) to S.B.J. and (2016R1D1A1B02011142) to M.S.J. This work was also supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (Grant No. 2021R1C1C2004755 to C. W. H.)

References

  1. Chen G and Goeddel DV. 2002. TNF-R1 signaling: a beautiful pathway. Science 296: 1634-1635. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071924
  2. Gao Z, Hwang D, Bataille F, Lefevre M, York D, Quon MJ, et al. 2002. Serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 by inhibitor kappa B kinase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 48115-48121. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209459200
  3. Li J, McQuade T, Siemer AB, Napetschnig J, Moriwaki K, Hsiao YS, et al. 2012. The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell 150: 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.019
  4. Wu ZH, Wong ET, Shi Y, Niu J, Chen Z, Miyamoto S, et al. 2010. ATM- and NEMO-dependent ELKS ubiquitination coordinates TAK1-mediated IKK activation in response to genotoxic stress. Mol. Cell 40: 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.010
  5. Park, Y. H., Jeong, M. S. and Jang, S. B. (2014) Death domain complex of the TNFR-1, TRADD, and RIP1 proteins for death-inducing signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 443: 1155-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.068
  6. Park YH, Jeong MS, Park HH, Jang SB. 2013. Formation of the death domain complex between FADD and RIP1 proteins in vitro. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1834: 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.08.013
  7. Carrington PE, Sandu C, Wei Y, Hill JM, Morisawa G, Huang T, et al. 2006. The structure of FADD and its mode of interaction with proCaspase-8. Mol. Cell 22: 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.018
  8. Kischkel FC, Lawrence DA, Chuntharapai A, Schow P, Kim KJ, Ashkenazi A. 2000. Apo2L/TRAIL-dependent recruitment of endogenous FADD and Caspase-8 to death receptors 4 and 5. Immunity 12: 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80212-5
  9. Scott FL, Stec B, Pop C, Dobaczewska MK, Lee JJ, Monosov E, et al. 2009. The Fas-FADD death domain complex structure unravels signalling by receptor clustering. Nature 457: 1019-1022. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07606
  10. Wang LW, Yang JK, Kabaleeswaran V, Rice AJ, Cruz AC, Park AY, et al. 2010. The Fas-FADD death domain complex structure reveals the basis of DISC assembly and disease mutations. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17: 1324-U1176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1920
  11. Mouratidis PX, Colston KW, Dalgleish AG. 2007. Doxycycline induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 120: 743-752. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22303
  12. Jang MS, Lee SJ, Kim CJ, Lee CW, Kim E. 2011. Phosphorylation by polo-like kinase 1 induces the tumor-suppressing activity of FADD. Oncogene 30: 471-481. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.423
  13. Shimada K, Matsuyoshi S, Nakamura M, Ishida E, Kishi M, Konishi N. 2004. Phosphorylation of FADD is critical for sensitivity to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. Carcinogenesis 25: 1089-1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgh130
  14. Shimada K, Nakamura M, Ishida E, Kishi M, Yonehara S. Konishi N. 2002. Phosphorylation of Fas-associated death domain contributes to enhancement of etoposide-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 93: 1164-1174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2002.tb01219.x
  15. Riedl SJ and Shi YG. 2004. Molecular mechanisms of caspase regulation during apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5: 897-907. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1496
  16. Muzio M, Stockwell BR, Stennicke HR, Salvesen GS, Dixit VM. 1998. An induced proximity model for caspase-8 activation. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 2926-2930. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.5.2926
  17. Dickens LS, Boyd RS, Jukes-Jones R, Hughes MA, Robinson GL, Fairall L, et al. 2012. A Death effector domain chain DISC model reveals a crucial role for caspase-8 chain assembly in mediating apoptotic cell death. Mol. Cell 47: 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.004
  18. Schleich K, Warnken U, Fricker N, Ozturk S, Richter P, Kammerer K, et al. 2012. Stoichiometry of the CD95 death-inducing signaling complex: Experimental and modeling evidence for a death effector domain chain model. Mol. Cell 47: 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.006
  19. Otwinowski Z and Minor W. 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Method Enzymol. 276: 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X
  20. Kissinger CR, Gehlhaar DK, Fogel DB. 1999. Rapid automated molecular replacement by evolutionary search. Acta Crystallogr. D 55: 484-491. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444998012517
  21. Jones TA, Zou JY, Cowan SW, Kjeldgaard M. 1991. Improved methods for building protein models in electron-density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A 47: 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767390010224
  22. Yang JK. 2015. Death effecter domain for the assembly of death-inducing signaling complex. Apoptosis 20: 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-014-1060-6
  23. Nagata S. 1997. Apoptosis induced by a death factor. FASEB J. 11: A857-A857.
  24. El-Deiry WS. 2001. Insights into cancer therapeutic design based on p53 and TRAIL receptor signaling. Cell Death Differ. 8: 1066-1075. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400943