DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bias-corrected Hp(10)-to-Organ-Absorbed Dose Conversion Coefficients for the Epidemiological Study of Korean Radiation Workers

  • Jeong, Areum (Department of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kwon, Tae-Eun (Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health) ;
  • Lee, Wonho (College of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Sunhoo (Department of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2022.04.26
  • Accepted : 2022.08.05
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

Background: The effects of radiation on the health of radiation workers who are constantly susceptible to occupational exposure must be assessed based on an accurate and reliable reconstruction of organ-absorbed doses that can be calculated using personal dosimeter readings measured as Hp(10) and dose conversion coefficients. However, the data used in the dose reconstruction contain significant biases arising from the lack of reality and could result in an inaccurate measure of organ-absorbed doses. Therefore, this study quantified the biases involved in organ dose reconstruction and calculated the bias-corrected Hp(10)-to-organ-absorbed dose coefficients for the use in epidemiological studies of Korean radiation workers. Materials and Methods: Two major biases were considered: (a) the bias in Hp(10) arising from the difference between the dosimeter calibration geometry and the actual exposure geometry, and (b) the bias in air kerma-to-Hp(10) conversion coefficients resulting from geometric differences between the human body and slab phantom. The biases were quantified by implementing personal dosimeters on the slab and human phantoms coupled with a Monte Carlo method and considered to calculate the bias-corrected Hp(10)-to-organ-absorbed dose conversion coefficients. Results and Discussion: The bias in Hp(10) was significant for large incident angles and low energies (e.g., 0.32 for right lateral at 218 keV), whereas the bias in dose coefficients was significant for the posteroanterior (PA) geometry only (e.g., 0.79 at 218 keV). The bias-corrected Hp(10)-to-organ-absorbed dose conversion coefficients derived in this study were up to 3.09- fold greater than those from the International Commission on Radiological Protection publications without considering the biases. Conclusion: The obtained results will aid future studies in assessing the health effects of occupational exposure of Korean radiation workers. The bias-corrected dose coefficients of this study can be used to calculate organ doses for Korean radiation workers based on personal dose records.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant given to the Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), funded by Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (No. 50091-2021).

References

  1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.11.001
  2. Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation. Adopted by the ICRP and ICRU in September 1995. Ann ICRP. 1996;26(3-4):1-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6453(97)82921-1
  3. Petoussi-Henss N, Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Endo A, Hertel N, Hunt J, et al. ICRP Publication 116: conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures. Ann ICRP. 2010;40(2-5):1-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2011.10.001
  4. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Deriving organ doses and their uncertainty for epidemiologic studies (NCRP Report No. 178). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2018.
  5. Lee C, Lee C, Park SH, Lee JK. Development of the two Korean adult tomographic computational phantoms for organ dosimetry. Med Phys. 2006;33(2):380-390. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2161405
  6. Zankl M. Personal dose equivalent for photons and its variation with dosimeter position. Health Phys. 1999;76(2):162-170. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199902000-00008
  7. Kwon TE, Jeong A, Kim E, Cho J, Chung Y, Lee DN, et al. Organ dose reconstruction for Korean radiation workers study. Jeju, Korea: Proceedings of the Korean Association for Radiation Protection Spring Conference; 2021. p. 110-112.
  8. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Measurement of dose equivalents from external photon and electron radiations (ICRU Report No. 47). Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 1992.
  9. Yeom YS, Choi C, Han H, Lee H, Shin B, Nguyen TT, et al. Dose coefficients of mesh-type ICRP reference computational phantoms for idealized external exposures of photons and electrons. Nucl Eng Technol. 2019;51(3):843-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.12.006
  10. Park S, Seo S, Lee D, Park S, Jin YW. A cohort study of Korean radiation workers: baseline characteristics of participants. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072328