문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제8권5호
  • /
  • Pages.9-16
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bloom의 신교육목표분류학에 기반한 2015 특수교육 교육과정 중학교 체육과 성취기준 분석

Analysis of Achievement Standards of 2015 Special Education Curriculum based on Bloom' Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Middle School Physical Education

  • 이옥인 (전주대학교 중등특수교육과)
  • Lee, Okin (Dept. of Secondary Special Education, Jeonju Univ)
  • 투고 : 2022.06.13
  • 심사 : 2022.08.18
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 Bloom의 신교육목표분류학에 근거하여 2015 특수교육교육과정 중학교 체육과 교육과정 성취기준을 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 해당 교육과정 체육과 중학교 공통교육과정과 기본교육과정 성취기준 문장수 184개를Bloom의 신교육목표분류학 지식 4개차원과 인지과정 6개차원 총 24개 조합으로 분석하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 특수교육교육과정 체육과 중학교 성취기준의 경우 선행연구에서 나타난 초등학교 기본교육과정 분석과 달리 '절차적 지식-적용하다' 조합이 가장 많았으며 학교급별 위계가 있음을 확인하였다. 또한 지식과 인지과정 차원이 비교적 다양하게 나타나 장애학생을 위한 체육과 중학교 수업의 중점사항을 확인할 수 있었다. 둘째, 하위 교육과정중 공통교육과정의 경우 '기억하다'와 같은 인지과정 차원을 제외하고 비교적 다양하게 지식과 인지과정 차원이 나타났으며, '메타인지 지식'과 '창안하다'와 같은 고등 지식 및 인지과정 차원도 나타난 것으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 하위 교육과정 중 기본교육과정의 경우 '절차적 지식-적용하다' 조합이 60.7%로 과도하게 집중되는 현상이 나타나 개선이 필요한 것으로 분석되었다.

This study attempted to analyze the achievement criteria of the 2015 special curriculum middle school physical education curriculum based on Bloom's new education goal taxonomy. To this end, 184 sentences based on the common curriculum and basic curriculum achievement standards of the relevant curriculum were analyzed into a total of 24 combinations of 4 dimensions of Bloom's new education goal taxonomy and 6 dimensions of cognitive courses. The results of the study are as follows. First, in the case of the special curriculum physical education and middle school achievement standards, unlike the analysis of the basic curriculum of elementary schools shown in previous studies, the 'procedural knowledge-applying' combination was the most common, and it was confirmed that there was a hierarchy by school level. In addition, the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive processes were relatively diverse, confirming the key points of physical education and middle school classes for disabled students. Second, in the case of the common curriculum among the lower curriculum, knowledge and cognitive process dimensions were relatively diverse except for cognitive process dimensions such as 'remember', and higher knowledge and cognitive process dimensions such as 'metacognitive knowledge' and 'creative'. Third, in the case of the basic curriculum among the lower curriculum, the 'procedural knowledge-applying' combination was excessively concentrated at 60.7%, which was analyzed to require improvementsary.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum Explanation," Sejong: Author, 2017.
  2. Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum: Part 1," Sejong: Author, 2022.
  3. S. Kim, S. Baek, and S. Chae, "A Review of the Development of 'Achievement Standards and Evaluation Criteria' in National Level," Journal of Educational Evaluation, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.47-73, 1998.
  4. J. I. Choi, and S. H. Paik, "A Comparative Analysis of Achievement Standards of the 2007 & 2009 Revised Elementary Science Curriculumwith Next Generation Science Standards in US based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy," Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.277-288, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.2.0277
  5. B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals," NY: David McKay, 1956.
  6. L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. C. Wittrock, "A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," NY: Longman, 2001.
  7. D. R. Krathwohl, "A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview," Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp.212-218, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  8. P. W. Airasian, and H. Miranda, "The Role of Assessment in the Revised Taxonomy," Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp.249-254, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_8
  9. S. Kim, and B. Park, "The Instructional Objectives of Elementary School Physical Education in Special Education: FromPerspectives of Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy," Korean Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.95-108, 2017.
  10. S. Do, "A Study on the Analysis of Instructional Objectives of 'Career and Vocation Education' Textbook Revised Basic Curriculum in the Secondary School for Special School in 2011: Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.471-492., 2014.
  11. M. Lee, M. Kim, and B. U. Jeon, "A Study on the Analysis of Instructional Objectives of the Revised Basic Curriculum for Special Education of 'Korean Language' Textbooks in 2011: Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, Vol. 16. No. 1, pp.237-260, 2015.
  12. Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum: Part 2," Sejong: Author, 2020.
  13. Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum: Part 3," Sejong: Author, 2020.
  14. W. Cho, and S. Kim, "Analysis of Achievement Standards of 2015 Revised High School Mathematics Curriculum Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.381-402, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.1.381
  15. K. B. Park, "Analysis of Social Studies Achieve Standards through Bloom's Taxonomy," The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.135-152, 2016 https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.27.4.201612.135