DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flooding Simulation of Sandae Reservoir Collapse using 2D Hydrologic Model FLO-2D

2차원 수문모형 FLO-2D를 이용한 산대 저수지 붕괴 침수 모의

  • Liu, Danxun (Department of Civil Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, Khil Ha (Department of Civil Engineering, Daegu University)
  • 류단쉰 (대구대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 이길하 (대구대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2022.06.09
  • Accepted : 2022.08.29
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

This study is to examine how well the hydrologic model reproduces the dam collapse. To do this, A hydrologic model FLO-2D is being operated to reproduce dam collapse with rainfall data and surface data in a small dam. In order to examine the performance of the model, the simulation was compared and reviewed with the data collected through the field survey. The results show that it takes about 2 hours to reach 1 km downstream. Inundation areas are about 188,640 m2 by the simulation and the difference from the field investigation is about 6.1%. Ten representative points were selected from the areas where the simulation and the field survey did not match. The discrepancy is less than about 0.08 m and does not appear to be significant. This study will present basic information on disaster preparedness operation and planning to minimize damage caused by sudden collapse of agricultural soil dams in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Alcrudo, F., Mullet, J., 2007, Description of the Tous dam break case study(Spain), Hydraul. Res., 45, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521832
  2. Alvarez, M., Puertas, J., Pena, E., Bermudez, M., 2017, Two-dimensional dam-break flood analysis in data-sarce regions: The case study of Chipembe dam, Mozambique, Water, 9, 432-433. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060432
  3. Brown, R. J., Rogers, D. C. A., 1977, Simulation of the hydraulic events during and following the Teton Dam failure. Proc., Dam-Break Flood Routing Workshop, Water Resources Council, Bethesda, Md., 131-163.
  4. Costa, J. E., Schuster, R. L., 1988, The formation and failure of natural dams, Geol. Soc. Am., Bull, 10, 1054-1068. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<1054:TFAFON>2.3.CO;2
  5. Costa, J. E., 1985, Floods from dam failures, Open-File Rep. USGS, Denver, 85-560.
  6. FLO-2D SOFTWARE Inc., 2005, FLO-2D PRO Reference manual., Nutrioso, AZ.
  7. Fread, D. L., 1977, The development and testing of a dam-break flood forecasting model, Proc., Dam-Break Flood Routing Model Workshop, US Water Research Council, Washington, D. C., 164-197.
  8. Fread, D. L., 1988a, BREACH, An Erosion model for earthen dam failures, National Weather Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland.USA, 34.
  9. Fread, D. L., 1988b, The NWS DAMBRK MODEL: Theoretical background/User documentation, National Weather Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA, 315.
  10. Froehlich, D. C., 2008, Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties, J. of Hydraul. Eng.-ASCE, 134, 1708-1721. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:12(1708)
  11. Froehlich, D. C., 2016, Predicting peak discharge from gradually breached embankment dam, J. of Hydrol. Eng. 21, 0401-6041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001424
  12. Gallegos, H. A., Schubert, J. E., Sander, B. F., 2012, Structural damage prediction in a high-velocity urban dam-break flood: a field-scale assessment of predictive skill, J. of Eng. Mech.-ASCE, 138, 1249-1262. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000427
  13. International Commission on Large Dams, 1998, World register of dams: 4th updating, International Commission on Large Dams, Paris.
  14. Lee, K. H., Kim, S. W., Yu, S., Kim, S. H., Cho, J., Kim, J. M., 2013, Building a hydrograph triggered by earth dam-break for flood hazard map, The J. of Eng. Geol. 23, 381-387. https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2013.4.381
  15. Lee, K. H., Son, M. H., Kim, S. W., Yu, S. Y., Cho, J. W., Kim, J. M., Jung, K. J., 2014, Sensitivity analysis of model parameters of dam-break/FLO-2D coupled model to flood inundation, The J. of Eng. Geol. 24, 53-67 https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2014.1.53
  16. Macchione, F., 2008, Model for predicting floods due to Earthen Dam breaching. I: Formulation and Evaluation, J. of Hydraul. Eng., 134, 1688-1696. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:12(1688)
  17. Morris, M. W., Mohamed, M. A. A. M., Vaskinn, K. A., 2007, Breach formation: field test and laboratory experiments, J. Hydraul, Res 45, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521828
  18. Morris, M. W., 2009, Modelling Breach Initiation and Growth, FLOOD site Report, T06-08-02.
  19. Morris, M. W., 2011, Breaching of Earth Embankments and Dams, PhD Thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes, England.
  20. Neelz, S., Pender, G., 2013, Bench marking the Latest Generation of 2D hydraulic modelling packages, Report No. SC120002., Environment Agency: Bristol, UK.
  21. Soares-Frazao, S., Canelas, R., Cao, Z., Cea, L., Chaudhry, H. M., Die Moran, A., Kadi, K. E., Ferreira, R., Cadorniga, I. F., Gonzalez-Ramirez, N., 2012, Dam-break flows over mobile beds: Experiment sand bench mark tests for numerical models, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 50, 364-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.689682
  22. Spada, E., Sinagra, M., Tucciarelli, T., Biondi, D., 2017, Unsteady state water level analysis for discharge hydrograph estimation in rivers with torrential regime: The case study of the February 2016 flood event in the Crati river, South Italy, after (https://www.mdpi.com/2073-444/9/4/288/htm).
  23. Wahl, T. L., 2010, Dam breach modeling - An overview of analysis methods, 2nd joint federal interagency conference, Las Vegas, NV.
  24. West, M., Morris, M. W., 2018, Hassan a guide to breach prediction, HR Wallingford, UK.
  25. Wu, W., 2013, Simplified physically based model of earthen embankment breaching, J. of Hydraul. Eng.-ASCE, 139, 861-851.
  26. Wu, W., 2016, Inputs and outputs of DL breach - A simplified physically based dam/levee breach model, Technical report, Clarkson University, NY.