DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Planting Density on Growth Characteristics, Dry Matter Yield and Feed Value of Teosinte New Variety, "Geukdong 6" [Zea mays L. subsp. mexicana (Schrad.) H. H. lltis]

  • Lee, Se Ho (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Joong (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang Moo (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2022.08.17
  • Accepted : 2022.09.14
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the effects of planting densities on the growth characteristics, dry matter yield, and feed value of "Geukdong 6" (a new variety of corn for feed). The experimental design was arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. Treatments consisted of six planting densities, 60 cm × 25 cm (T1), 60 cm × 30 cm (T2), 70 cm × 25 cm (T3), 70 cm × 30 cm (T4), 80 cm × 25 cm (T5) and 80 cm × 30 cm (T6). All treatments were sown on May 14, 2021, and the harvest was on October 3 (late flowering). Plant length and the number of tillers were the highest in T5 (p<0.05), but the number of leaves and stem diameter were the highest in T6 than in the other treatments (p<0.05). Leaf length, leaf width, and dead leaf were not significantly different among the treatments. Organic matter was highest in T6, and crude protein was highest in T5 (p<0.05). The ether extract was not significantly different among the treatments. Crude fiber, NDF, and ADF were highest in T2 with relatively higher planting density (p<0.05). Calcium and phosphorus were not significantly different among the treatments. TDN content was the highest in T3 (p<0.05). Sugar degree (Brix), fructose, glucose, dextran, isomerose, and inverted sugar were not significantly different among the treatment. Fresh yield, dry matter yield and TDN yield were higher in order of T6 > T5 > T4 > T3 > T2 > T1 (p<0.05). Relatively feed value was higher in order of T3 > T6 > T5 > T1 > T4 > T2 (p<0.05). Based on the above results, planting density could be recommended from 80 cm × 30 cm for efficient production of "Geukdong 6".

Keywords

References

  1. Abuzar, M.R., Sadozai, G.U., Baloch, M.S., Baloch, A.A., Shah, I.H., Javaid, T. and Hussain, N. 2011. Effect of plant population densities on yield of maize. The Journal of Animal and Plant Science. 21(4):692-695.
  2. Agdag, M., Nelson, L., Baltensperger, D., Lyon, D. and Kachman, S. 2001. Row spacing affects grain yield and other agronomic characters of proso millet. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 32(13-14):2021-2032. doi:10.1081/CSS-120000266
  3. Akman, Z. 2002. Effect of tiller removing and plant density on ear yield of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt). Pakistan Journal of Biological Science. 5(9):906-908. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2002.906.908
  4. AOAC. 2019. Official methods of analysis (16th ed.). Association of Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC., USA.
  5. Cui, Y., Kim, E.J. and Lee, S.M. 2016. Growth characteristics, yield and nutritive values of new Teosinte, 'Geukdong 6'. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 36(2):150-158. doi:10.5333/KGFS.2016.36.2.150
  6. El-Lakany, M.A. and Russell, W.A. 1971. Relationship of maize characters with yield in testcrosses of inbreds at different plant densities. Crop Science. 11(5):698-701. doi:10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100050028x
  7. Fairey, N.A. 1982. Influence of population density and hybrid maturity on productivity and quality of forage maize. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 62(2):427-434. doi:10.4141/cjps82-061
  8. Farnia, A. and Mansouri, M. 2014. Effect of plant density to yield and yield components of Maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Science. 3:123-127.
  9. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses. Agriculture. Handbook, No. 379. ARS, USDA, Washington DC.
  10. Holland, C., Kezar, W., Kautz, W.P., Lazowski, E.J., Mahanna, W.C. and Reinhart, R. 1990. Pioneer forage manual: A nutritional guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred International. pp. 19-21.
  11. Jeon, B.T., Lee, S.M., Shin, D.U., Moon, S.H. and Kim, U.S. 1992. Effect of plant density and planting pattern on the growth characteristics, dry matter yield and feeding value of SorghumSudangrass hybrid. Journal of Korean Grassland Science. 12(1):49-58.
  12. Jung, K.Y., Choi, Y.D., Chun, H.C., Lee, S.H. and Jeon, S.H. 2019. Effects of planting density on growth and yield in wide-row drill seeding of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Korean Journal of Crop Science. 64(1):33-39. doi:10.7740/kjcs.2019.64.1.033
  13. Jung, K.Y., Park, S.K., Kang, H.W., Cho, Y.S. and Jeon, S.H. 2016. Effects of plant number per hill on growth and yield of high ridge hill-seeded foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Korean Journal of Crop Science. 61(2):119-123. doi:10.7740/kjcs.2016.61.2.119
  14. Kang, N.J., Cho, M.W., Kweon, J.K., Rhee, H.C. and Choi, Y.H. 2006. Effects of deficit irrigation on the total soluble solids and fruit yields of fresh tomato. Journal of Bio-Environment Control. 15(4):335-339.
  15. Kim, G.S. and Lee, S.M. 2019. Effects of seeding dates on the growth characteristics, dry matter yield and feed value of Teosinte new variety, "Geukdong 6" [Zea mays L. subsp. mexicana (Schrad.) H. H. Iltis]. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage
  16. Kim, J.G., Chung, E.S., Seo, S., Kang, W.S., Yang, J.S. and Cho, Y.M. 1998. Effects of plant density on forage yield and quality of corn. Journal of the Korean Grassland Science. 18(1):49-54.
  17. Kim, J.G., Jeong, E.C., Kim, M.J., Li, Y.F., Kim, H.J. and Lee, S.H. 2021. Comparison of growth characteristics and productivity of summer forage crops in Sihwa reclaimed land. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 41(2):110-118. doi:10.5333/KGFS.2021.41.2.110
  18. Kim, W.S., Hwang, J.H., Lee, J.H., Kim, E.J., Jeon, B.T., Moon, S.H. and Lee, S.M. 2012. A comparative study on the growth characteristics and nutritional components of corn hybrids for silage at paddy field cultivation. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 32(1):15-28. doi:10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.15
  19. KREI. 2022. Animal husbandry observation. Hanwoo and beef cattle. June Issue. pp. 1-2.
  20. Lee, S.M. and Lee, J.H. 2010. Effects of seeding dates and growth periods on the growth characteristics, dry matter yield and feed value of corn for silage in paddy field. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 52(5):441-448. doi:10.5187/JAST.2010.52.5.441
  21. Linn, J.G. and Martin, N.P. 1989. Forage quality tests and interpretation. AG-FO-2637, Minnesota Extension, USA.
  22. MAFRA. 2021. Press release. https://www.mafra.go.kr/mafra/293
  23. Masaoka, Y.K. and Takano, N.B. 1980. Studies on the digestibility of forage crops. I. Effect of plant density on the feeding value of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Journal of Japanese Society of Grassland Science. 26(2):179-184.
  24. SAS. 2002. SAS user's guide, Statistics. SAS Inst. Ins., NC.
  25. Sibonginkosi, N., Mzwandile, M. and Tamado, T. 2020. Effect of plant density on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids at Luyengo, Middleveld of Eswatini. Asian Plant Research Journal. 3(3-4):1-9. doi:10.9734/APRJ/2019/v3i3-430066
  26. Smith, A.E. 1972. A method for quantifying carbohydrate fractions in forage plants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 20:238-239. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60180a009
  27. Testa, G., Reyneri, A. and Blandino, M. 2016. Maize grain yield enhancement through high plant density cultivation with different inter-row and intra-row spacings. European Journal of Agronomy. 72:28-37. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.006
  28. Wang, C. and Lee, S.M. 2020. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on forage production and nutritive Nalue of Geukdong 6, Teosinte hybrid [Zea mays L. subsp. mexicana (Schrad.) H. H. Iltis]. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 40(1):37-43. doi:10.5333/KGFS.2020.40.1.37
  29. Youngerman, C.Z., DiTommaso, A., Curran, W.S., Mirsky, S.B. and Ryan, M.R. 2018. Corn density effect on interseeded cover crops, weeds, and grain yield. Agronomy Journal. 110(6):2478-2487. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.01.0010