DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

From Technology to Content: Research on the Development of VR Flow Experience

  • Sang, YuanZi (Department of Visual Contents, Dongseo University) ;
  • Kim, KiHong (Department of Visual Contents, Dongseo University) ;
  • Pan, Yang (Department of Visual Contents, Dongseo University)
  • Received : 2022.07.26
  • Accepted : 2022.08.02
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

Immersion is a features of VR technology, and the most important condition for evaluating VR experience. With the improvement of VR technology, including the presentation accuracy of VR content, the degree of interaction is diversified, the user's immersion in VR equipment should not only be improved technically, but researched from the user's perception level. The paper defines two important factors, immersion and presence, in a participant's experience with a VR device. Although the current technology can already simulate the real environment information visually and audibly, the content of the VR environment is not enough for us to achieve a completely real experience. Based on the Flow theory of Csikszentmihalyi and the sensory immersion achieved by current technology, this paper proposes the key factors of how to achieve conscious immersion for users in VR media. We prove that immersion is an indicator of the true degree of sensory simulation of VR equipment and is the basis for the realization of flow experience. What really makes the participant feel a perfect experience is the content provided by the VR environment and gave participants a sense of presence, it is not limited to video or games. On the premise of the Multi-Sensory, Immersion, Interactivity and Imagination experience achieved by using virtual reality technology, combined with the content creation of flow theory, the interactive immersion achieved by users is an important method to realize the awareness immersion of VR equipment.

Keywords

References

  1. Kaufmann, Hannes, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Michael Wagner. "Construct3D: a virtual reality application for mathematics and geometry education." Education and information technologies 5.4 (2000): 263-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012049406877
  2. Molnar, Gyorgy, and Zoltan Szuts. "Augmented Reality, Games and Art: Immersion and Flow." Augmented Reality Games I. Springer, Cham, 2019. 61-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_5
  3. Kong Shaohua. "From Immersion to Flow experience: Re-understanding of "Immersive Communication"." Journal of Capital Normal University: Social Science Edition 4 (2019): 74-83.
  4. Witmer, Bob G., and Michael J. Singer. "Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire." Presence 7.3 (1998): 225-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
  5. Mine, Mark R. "Virtual environment interaction techniques." UNC Chapel Hill CS Dept (1995).
  6. Jeong, Wonjun, and Seokhee Oh. "Correlation between the immersion and presence: focused on virtual reality contents." 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC49870.2020.9289207
  7. Bowman, Doug A., and Ryan P. McMahan. "Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough?." Computer 40.7 (2007): 36-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.257
  8. Slater, Mel, Bernhard Spanlang, and David Corominas. "Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence." ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 29.4 (2010): 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778829
  9. Cheng, Li-Keng, Ming-Hua Chieng, and Wei-Hua Chieng. "Measuring virtual experience in a three-dimensional virtual reality interactive simulator environment: a structural equation modeling approach." Virtual Reality 18.3 (2014): 173-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-014-0244-2
  10. Bowman, Doug A., and Ryan P. McMahan. "Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough?." Computer 40.7 (2007): 36-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.257
  11. Kang, Sing Bing. "Hands-free interface to a virtual reality environment using head tracking." U.S. Patent No. 6,009,210. 28 Dec. 1999.
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, and Mihaly Csikzentmihaly. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Vol. 1990. New York: Harper & Row, 1990.
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, and Mihaly Csikzentmihaly. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Vol. 1990. New York: Harper & Row, 1990.
  14. Nakamura J,Csikszentmihalyi. The concept of flow. Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press,2009: 89-105
  15. Schultze, Ulrike. "Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review." Journal of Information Technology 25.4 (2010): 434-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.25
  16. Slater, Mel, and Sylvia Wilbur. "A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments." Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6.6 (1997): 603-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
  17. Schultze, Ulrike. "Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review." Journal of Information Technology 25.4 (2010): 434-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.25
  18. Guoyao, Tang, and Zhou Wenjie. "The Study on Self-consciousness in Flow." Philosophy Study 10.10 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2020.10.002
  19. Herbelin, Bruno, et al. Neural mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness and the experience of presence in virtual reality. No. BOOK_CHAP. De Gruyter, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110471137-005
  20. Riva, Giuseppe, John A. Waterworth, and Eva L. Waterworth. "The layers of presence: a bio-cultural approach to understanding presence in natural and mediated environments." CyberPsychology & Behavior 7.4 (2004): 402-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.402
  21. Fabrega Jr, Horacio. "The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness." Psychiatric Services 51.12 (2000): 1579-1579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.51.12.1579
  22. Schultze, Ulrike. "Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review." Journal of Information Technology 25.4 (2010): 434-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.25
  23. Schultze, Ulrike. "Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review." Journal of Information Technology 25.4 (2010): 434-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.25
  24. Riva, Giuseppe, Fabrizia Mantovani, and Andrea Gaggioli. "Presence and rehabilitation: toward second-generation virtual reality applications in neuropsychology." Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 1.1 (2004): 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-1-9
  25. Chen Xin. "Flow experience and its research status." Journal of Jiangsu Normal University: Philosophy and Social Sciences 40.5 (2014): 150-155.
  26. Klasen, Martin, et al. "Neural contributions to flow experience during video game playing." Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 7.4 (2012): 485-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr021
  27. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. "A reponse to the Kimiecik & Stein and Jackson papers." Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 4.2 (1992): 181-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209208406460
  28. Rheinberg, Falko, and Regina Vollmeyer. "Flow experience in a computer game under experimentally controlled conditions." ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 211.4 (2003): 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1026//0044-3409.211.4.161
  29. Jackson, Susan A., and Herbert W. Marsh. "Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow Situation Scale." Journal of sport and exercise psychology 18.1 (1996): 17-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
  30. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, and Isabella Selega Csikszentmihalyi, eds. Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge university press, 1992.
  31. Dinh, H. Q., Walker, N., Hodges, L. F., Song, C., & Kobayashi, A. (1999, March). Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual, pp. 222-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.1999.756955