Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Foraging behavior and pollination efficiency of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) and stingless bees (Tetragonula laeviceps species complex) on mango (Mangifera indica L., cv. Nam Dokmai) in Northern Thailand

  • Chuttong, Bajaree (Meliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Panyaraksa, Lakkhika (Meliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Tiyayon, Chantaluk (Department of Plant and Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Kumpoun, Wilawan (Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Chantrasri, Parinya (Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Lertlakkanawat, Phurichaya (Meliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Jung, Chuleui (Department of Plant Medicals, Andong National University) ;
  • Burgett, Michael (Meliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University)
  • Received : 2022.01.21
  • Accepted : 2022.06.24
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The mango is one of the essential fruit trees for the economy of Thailand. Mango pollination relies primarily on insects. Other external forces, such as wind, are less efficient since pollen is sticky and aggregating. There is only one report from Thailand on the use of bees as mango pollinators. The study of the behavior and pollination efficiency of honey bees (Apis mellifera) and stingless bees (Tetragonula laeviceps species complex) was conducted in Nam Dokmai mango plantings in Phrao and Mae Taeng districts, Chiang Mai province, between February and March 2019. Results: Our results reveal that the honey bees commenced foraging earlier than the stingless bee. The number of flowers visited within 1 minute by honey bees was higher than that visited by stingless bees. The average numbers of honey bees and stingless bees that flew out of the hive per minute from 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. in the Phrao district were 4.21 ± 1.62 and 9.88 ± 7.63 bees/min, respectively, i.e., higher than those observed in Mae Taeng, which were 3.46 ± 1.13 and 1.23 ± 1.20 bees/min, respectively. The numbers of fruits per tree were significantly higher in the honey bee and stingless bee treatments (T1 and T2) than in the open pollination treatment (T3). The number of fruits between T1 and T2 treatments was not different. In the pollinator exclusion treatment (T4), no fruit was produced. Fruit size factors were not significantly different among T1, T2, and T3 treatments. Conclusions: Our results showed that insect pollination is crucial for mango production, especially with the Nam Dokmai variety in Northern Thailand. As pollinator exclusion treatment showed no fruit set, and pollinator treatment significantly increased the fruit sets compared to open access plots, a managed pollinator program would benefit the mango growers for better productivity. Both the honey bee and the stingless bee were shown to be effective as pollinators.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Thai Mango Growers Association members in Phrao and Mae Taeng Districts, Chiang Mai province, for supporting the mango planting plots.

References

  1. Abou-Shaara HF. The foraging behaviour of honey bees, Apis mellifera: a review. Vet Med. 2014;59(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.17221/7240-VETMED
  2. Aleixo KP, Menezes C, Imperatriz Fonseca VL, da Silva CI. Seasonal availability of floral resources and ambient temperature shape stingless bee foraging behavior (Scaptotrigona aff. depilis). Apidologie. 2017;48(1):117-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-016-0456-4.
  3. Alqarni A, Ahmed K, Hannan M, Ghose G, Munshi J. Flies for the pollination of greenhouse mango (Mangifera Indica L., Anacardiaceae) in the subtropical Iriomote Island, Japan. J Asiat Soc Bangladesh Sci. 2017;43(1):135-41. https://doi.org/10.3329/jasbs.v43i1.46252.
  4. Amin MR, Namni S, Miah MR, Miah MG, Zakaria M, Suh SJ, et al. Insect inventories in a mango-based agroforestry area in Bangladesh: foraging behavior and performance of pollinators on fruit set. Entomol Res. 2015;45(4):217-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12112.
  5. Anderson DL, Sedgley M, Short JRT, Allwood AJ. Insect pollination of mango in northern Australia. Aust J Agric Res. 1982;33(3):541-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9820541.
  6. Biesmeijer J, Toth E. Individual foraging, activity level and longevity in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii in Costa Rica (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Insectes Soc. 1998;45(4):427-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000400050099.
  7. Bomfim IGA, de Melo Bezerra AD, Nunes AC, de Aragao FAS, Freitas BM. Adaptive and foraging behavior of two stingless bee species in greenhouse mini watermelon pollination. Sociobiology. 2014;61(4): 502-9. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.502-509.
  8. Burgett M, Burikam I. Number of adult honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) occupying a comb: a standard for estimating colony populations. J Econ Entomol. 1985;78(5):1154-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/78.5.1154.
  9. Chuttong B, Burgett M. Biometric studies of the stingless bee Tetragonula laeviceps complex (Apidae: Meliponini) from Northern Thailand. J Apic. 2017;32(4):359-62. https://doi.org/10.17519/apiculture.2017.11.32.4.359.
  10. Couvillon MJ, Walter CM, Blows EM, Czaczkes TJ, Alton KL, Ratnieks FLW. Busy bees: variation in insect flower-visiting rates across multiple plant species. Psyche. 2015;2015:134630. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/134630.
  11. Dag A, Gazit S. Mango pollinators in Israel. J Appl Hortic. 2000;2(1):39-43. https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2000.v02i01.12.
  12. Department of Agricultural Extension. [Situation of Mango Cultivation]. 2016. http://www.agriman.doae.go.th/home/news/2565/13mango.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2020. Thai.
  13. Du Toit AP. Pollination of avocados, mangoes and litchis. Plant Prot News. 1994;35:4-5.
  14. Du Toit AP, Swart D. Pollination of mango in the Letsitele Valley during the 1992 flowering season: first report. S Afr Mango Growers' Assoc. 1993;13:129-30.
  15. Gadhiya VC, Pastagia JJ. Time spent by stingless bees, Tetragonula laeviceps for nectar and pollen collection from musk melon flower. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2019;7(2):498-500.
  16. Gebremedhn H, Tadesse A, Belay T. Relating climatic factors to foraging behavior of honeybees (Apis mellifera) during blooming period of Guizotia abyssinica (L.F.). Livest Res Rural Dev. 2014;26(4):2-7.
  17. Heard TA. The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annu Rev Entomol. 1999;44(1):183-206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.183
  18. Huda AN, Salmah MR, Hassan AA, Hamdan A, Razak MN. Pollination services of mango flower pollinators. J Insect Sci. 2015;15(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev090.
  19. Joshi NC, Joshi PC. Foraging behaviour of Apis spp. on apple flowers in a subtropical environment. N Y Sci J. 2010;3(3):71-6.
  20. Kumar S, Joshi PC, Nath P, Singh VK, Mansotra DK. Role of insects in pollination of mango trees. Int Res J Biol Sci. 2016;5(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v5i1.6811
  21. Maia-Silva C, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Silva CI, Hrncir M. Environmental windows for foraging activity in stingless bees, Melipona subnitida Ducke and Melipona quadrifasciata Lepeletier (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini). Sociobiology. 2014;61(4):378-85. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.378-385.
  22. Mostajeran M, Edriss MA, Basiri MR. Analysis of colony and morphological characters in honey bees (Apis mellifera meda). Pak J Biol Sci. 2006;9(14):2685-8. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.2685.2688.
  23. Puangjik K. [The fruit set of mango (Mangifera indica L.)]. Sci Technol J. 2000;8(1):44-50. Thai.
  24. Ramirez F, Davenport TL. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) pollination: a review. Sci Hortic. 2016;203:158-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.011.
  25. Singh G. Insect pollinators of mango and their role in fruit setting. Acta Hortic. 1989;231:629-32. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.231.22.
  26. Singh G. Pollination, pollinators and fruit setting in mango. Acta Hortic. 1997;455:116-23. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.455.16.
  27. Srisuksai O. [Insect pollinators in mango, biology and morphology of domesticated stingless bees] [thesis]. Bangkok: Kasetsart University; 2021. Thai.
  28. Srivastava AK, Kashyap P, Meena VS, Verma N, Singh SP. Sapota [(Manilkara achras (Mill.) Fosberg (Syn: Achras zapota L.)]. In: Ghosh SN, Singh A, Thakur A., editors. Underutilized fruit crops: importance and cultivation. New Delhi: Jaya Publishing House; 2017. p. 1159-94.
  29. Sung IH, Lin MY, Chang CH, Cheng AS, Chen WS, Ho KK. Pollinators and their behaviors on mango flowers in southern Taiwan. Formos Entomol. 2006;26:161-70.
  30. Tanda AS. Why insect pollinators important in crop improvement? Indian J Entomol. 2021. doi: 10.55446/IJE.2021.42. [Epub ahead of print]
  31. Thongkong W. [Diversity of bee pollinators (Superfamily Apoidea) in Ton Ya Phlong waterfall area, Songkhla province]. Paper presented at: 2nd National and International Conference 2018; 2018; Buriram, Thailand. Burirum: Burirum Rajabhat University, 2018. p. 297-308. Thai.