상하수도학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater)

  • 제36권4호
  • /
  • Pages.229-237
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-7672(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-822X(eISSN)
대한상하수도학회 (The Korean Society of Water and Wastewater)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하수관거 통수능 해석을 위한 Huff 모형과 ABM 법의 적용성 분석

Applicability of Huff Model & ABM Method for Discharge Capacity of Sewer Pipe

  • 현인환 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 전승희 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 김두일 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Hyun, Inhwan (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Jeon, SeungHui (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Dooil (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2022.06.21
  • Accepted : 2022.08.15
  • Published : 2022.08.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

Abstract

The sewer capacity design have been based on the Huff model or the rational equation in South Korea and often failed to determine optimal capacity, resulting in frequent urban flooding or over-sizing. A time distribution of rainfall (i.e., Huff or ABM method) could be used instead of a rainfall hyetograph obtained from statistical analysis of previous rainfalls. In this study, the Huff method and the ABM method, which predict the time distribution of rain intensity, which are widely used to calculate sewage pipe drainage capacity using the SWMM, were compared with the standard rainfall intensity hyetograph of Seoul. If the rainfall duration was 30 minutes to 180 minutes, the rainfall intensity value calculated by the Huff model tended to be less than the rainfall intensity value of the standard rainfall intensity in the initial 5-10 minutes. As a result, more than 10% to 30% of under-design would be made. In addition, the rainfall intensity value calculated by the Huff model from the section excluding the initial 5-10 minutes of rainfall to the rainfall duration was calculated larger than the value using the standard rainfall intensity equation, which would result in an over-design of 10% to 30%. In the case of a relatively long rainfall duration of 360 minutes (6 hours) to 1,440 minutes (24 hours), it showed an lower rainfall intensity of 60 to 90% in the early stages of rainfall, but the problem of under-design had been solved as the rainfall duration time had elapsed. On the other hand, in the alternating block method (ABM) method, it was found that the rainfall intensity at the entire period at each assumed rainfall duration accurately matched the standard rainfall intensity hyetograph of Seoul.

Keywords

References

  1. Alfieri, L., Laio, F. and Claps, P. (2008). A simulation experiment for optimal design hyetograph selection, Hydrol. Process, 22, 813-820. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6646
  2. Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R. and Mays, L.W. (1988). Design storms (Chapter 14), McGraw-Hill, New York.
  3. Kimura, N., Tai, A., Chiang, S., Wei, H. P., Su, Y.F., Cheng, C.T. and Kitoh, A. (2014). Hydrological flood simulation using a design hyetograph created from extreme weather data of a high-resolution atmospheric general circulation model, Water, 6, 345-366. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6020345
  4. KWWA. (2010). Design guidance manual for waterworks, Seoul.
  5. Huff, F.A. (1967). Time Distribution of Rainfall in Heavy Storms, Water Resour. Res., 3(4), 1007-1019. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i004p01007
  6. Huff, F.A. (1970a). Spatial Distribution of Rainfall Rates, Water Resour. Res., 6(1), 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i001p00254
  7. Huff, F.A. (1970b). Time Distribution Characteristic of Rainfall Rates, Water Resour. Res., 6(2), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i002p00447
  8. Huff, F.A. (1986). Urban hydrology review, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 67(6), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-67.6.703
  9. Hsu, M.H., Chen, S.H. and Chang, T.J. (2000). Inundation simulation for urban drainage basin with storm sewer system, J. Hydrol., 234, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00237-7
  10. Keifer, C.J and Chu, H.H. (1957). Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design, J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE, 83, 1-25.
  11. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. (2011). Improvement and Supplement of Probability Rainfall in South Korea, Seoul.
  12. Park, J.P., Kang, T.U. and Lee, S.H. (2019). A temporal distribution method of probable rainfall for planning a storm sewer Network in an urban area, J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig., 19(1), 85-94.
  13. Pilgrim, D.H. and Cordery, I. (1975). Rainfall temporal patterns for design floods, J. Hydraul. Eng., 101, 81-95.
  14. Pilgrim, D.H. and Cordery, I. (1993). Flood runoff. In Handbook of Hydrology, 9 McGraw-Hill, New York.
  15. Praskievicz, S. and Chang, H. (2009). A review of hydrological modeling of basin-scale climate change and urban development impacts, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 33, 650-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309348098
  16. Ryu, J.N., Oh, J.I. and Oh, S.H. (2009). Sewerage rehabilitation strategy based on sewer capacity evaluation, J. Korean Soc. Water Wastewater, 23(1), 47-55.
  17. Yen, B.C. and Chow, V.T. (1980). Design Hyetographs for Small Drainage Structures, J. Hydraul. Eng., 106, 1055-1076.