과제정보
본 논문은 2018년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2018S1A5B5A02034210).
참고문헌
- 김성운(2021). 과학 실험 활동 중 도구와의 상호작용에서 나타나는 도구 어포던스: 전자석 만들기를 중심으로. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 11(1), 131-148.
- 김천웅, 정정인(2019). 영재학생들의 지식수준에 따른 과학적 문제해결 전략 분석. 초등과학교육, 38(1), 73-86.
- 노태희, 김민영, 최숙영, 강석진(2008). 과학 실험 보고서를 이용한 불일치 사례에 대한 학생들의 반응 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 633-640.
- 양일호, 김석민, 조현준(2007). 초.중등학교 과학 실험수업의 유형 분석. 한국교육과학회지, 27(3), 235-241.
- 임청환, 임귀숙(2011). 초등 과학 영재의 과학 문제 해결과정 분석. 초등과학교육, 30(2), 213-231.
- 조헌국, 송진웅(2011). 불일치 상황에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 관찰 유형과 학습자의 과학의 관점이 관찰 활동에 미치는 효과 분석. 초등과학교육, 30(4), 405-414.
- Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
- Baker, L. M., & Dunbar, K. (2000). Experimental design heuristics for scientific discovery: The use of "baseline" and "known standard" controls. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(3), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0393
- Bujak, K. R. (2014). Transitional embedded instructions for manipulating physical objects. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
- Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
- Dunbar, K. (1999). The scientist in vivo: How scientists think and reason in the laboratory. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 89-98). New York: Plenum.
- Fonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B., & Grobe, S. J. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300403
- Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x
- Graulich, N., Hopf, H., & Schreiner, P. R. (2010). Heuristic thinking makes a chemistsmart. Chemical Society Reviews, 39(5), 1503-1512. https://doi.org/10.1039/B911536F
- Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159-182). London: Routledge.
- Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269308560022
- Hogstrom, P., Ottander, C., & Benckert, S. (2010). Lab work and learning in secondary school chemistry: The importance of teacher and student interaction. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9131-3
- Johnstone, A. H. (1997). Chemistry teaching-science or alchemy? Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 262-268. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p262
- Kahneman, D., Slovic, S. P., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Kane, J. E., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Heuristics and biases that help and hinder scientists: Toward a psychology of scientific judgment and decision making. In G. J. Feist, & M. E. Goreman (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of science (pp. 437-465). New York: Springer.
- Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
- Klahr, D., Fay, A. L., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 111-146. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1003
- Knoblich, G., Ollinger, M., & Spivey, M. J. (2005). Tracking the eye to obtain insight into insight problem solving. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 355-375). Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
- Kools, M., Van de Wiel, M. W., Ruiter, R. A., & Kok, G. (2006). Pictures and text in instructions for medical devices: Effects on recall and actual performance. Patient Education and Counseling, 64(1-3), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.003
- Lehman, J. R. (1990). Students' verbal interactions during chemistry laboratories. School Science and Mathematics, 90(2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12006.x
- Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper Prepared for the Committee: High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC: University of York.
- Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
- Osborne, J. (1993). Alternatives to practical work. School Science Review, 75(271), 117-123.
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124