한국기록관리학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.21-36
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1598-1487(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7247(eISSN)
한국기록관리학회 (Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정보 컨티뉴엄 모델에 관한 연구: 기록과 정보 간의 관계 정립을 위한 예비적 분석

A Study on the Information Continuum Model: Preliminary Analysis to Establish the Relationship Between Records and Information

  • 김명훈 (국립 강릉원주대학교 인문사회)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.18
  • 심사 : 2022.08.12
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 기록이 지닌 정보로서의 속성에 주목해야 한다는 논의가 활발히 제기되고 있다. 이는 전자기록 환경을 맞아 행위에 대한 증거로서의 속성에만 초점을 맞추어 온 동향에 대한 반향이다. 하지만 아직까지 기록이 지닌 정보로서의 속성에 대한 명확한 개념은 정립되지 않은 상태이다. 이에 본고에서는 기록과 정보 간의 관계 정립을 위한 일환으로 정보 컨티뉴엄 모델을 분석하고자 한다. 정보 컨티뉴엄은 레코드 컨티뉴엄을 기반으로 레코드키핑 관점에서의 새로운 정보 개념을 정립하기 위해 고안된 이론 체계로, 레코드키핑 내에 존재하는 정보관리를 위한 요소들을 파악할 수 있는 하나의 개념적 틀을 제공해준다. 이에 2장에서는 레코드 컨티뉴엄 개발 이후 정보 컨티뉴엄이 개발된 배경 및 과정을 살펴본 다음, 구조주의 이론 등 정보학 이론을 차용해 정립한 정보의 개념을 레코드 컨티뉴엄과 연계하여 고찰하였다. 이어 3장에서는 정보 컨티뉴엄의 개념적 구조와 함께 정보의 활용 목적 및 방식을 고찰한 후, 레코드키핑 내에 존재하는 정보관리를 위한 요소들을 구조적으로 도식화한 정보 컨티뉴엄 모델상의 4개 차원 및 속성을 분석하였다. 이러한 분석을 기반으로 4장에서는 정보 컨티뉴엄이 지닌 의의 및 한계를 제시하고자 하였다.

This study intends to analyze the information continuum model as part of establishing the relationship between records and information. The information continuum is a theoretical system designed to establish a new information concept from the record-keeping point of view based on the record continuum. It provides a conceptual framework that can identify the elements for information management that exist in record-keeping. Accordingly, in Chapter 2, the background and process of the information continuum development, which followed after the record continuum development, were reviewed. Then, the concept of information established by borrowing information science theory was examined in relation to the record continuum. In Chapter 3, the conceptual structure of the information continuum and the purpose and method of information utilization were considered. Afterward, the four dimensions and attributes that structurally schematize the elements for information management in record-keeping were analyzed. Based on this analysis, Chapter 4 tried to present the meaning and limitations of the information continuum.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2020S1A5B5A16082244).

참고문헌

  1. Information and Documentation - Records Management - Part 1: Concepts and Principles. KS X ISO 15489:2016.
  2. Bailey, S. (2008). Managing the Crowd: Rethinking Records Management for the Web 2.0 World. London: Facet Publishing.
  3. Buckland, M. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42(5), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<351::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-3
  4. Burell, M. (2000). Appraisal and Information Theory. Principles of Appraisal and Their Application in Electronic Environment - European Models and Concepts: Proceedings of the DLM-Experts' Meeting in Tampere, Finland, November 11-12, 1999. Valtionarkisto: National Archives of Finland.
  5. Clarke, S. (2009). Crowded out: records management and the web 2.0 phenomenon. Archives & Manuscripts, 37(1), 118-133.
  6. Convery, N. (2011). Information Management, Records Management, Knowledge Management: The Place of Archives in a Digital Age. The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader. Hill, J. ed. London: Facet Publishing.
  7. Cox, R. J. (2001). Managing Records as Evidence and Information. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
  8. Cox, R. J. (2005). Archives & Archivists in the Information Age. New York: Neal-Schuman.
  9. Delmas, B. (2001). Archival science facing the information society. Archival Science, 1(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435637
  10. Duranti, L. & Xie, S. L. (2012). Knowledge management & records management: establishing relationships for common development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, 247-250. Available: http://www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_canada_dissemination_cpr_duranti~xie_kmis_2012.pdf
  11. Eiring, L. (2002). The evolving information world. Information Management Journal, 2002(1), 20-24.
  12. Farr, G. & McKemmish, S. (2013). Don schauder honoured by monash. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 38(1), 68-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2007.10721274
  13. Flynn, S. J. A. (2001). The records continuum model in context and its implications for archival practice. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037522
  14. Gibbons, L. (2017). Exploring Social Complexity: Continuum Theory and a Research Design Model for Archival Research. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Gilliland, A. J., McKemmish, S. & Lau, A. J. eds. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.
  15. Harris, V. (2005). Recordkeeping and records continuum thinkers: examining a seminal australian text. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(2), 160-170.
  16. Hughes, C. (2003). Blurred lines: records management in the knowledge management arena. Records Management Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj.2003.28113aaf.001
  17. Information Management Steering Committee (1996). Management of Government Information as a National Strategic Resource. 한구전산원 역(1997). 호주의 국가전략자원으로서 정부정보관리. 서울: 한국전산원.
  18. Johanson, G. (2004). The Information Continuum: Topic 7 Technology(IMS 5048). Monash University, 1-20.
  19. Johanson, G. (2005a). The Information Continuum: Introduction(IMS 5048). Monash University, 1-16.
  20. Johanson, G. (2005b). The Information Continuum: Topic 3 The Information Continuum Model(IMS 5048). Monash University, 1-20.
  21. Johanson, G. (2005c). The Information Continuum: Topic 4 Examples of Parts of the Information Continuum Model(IMS 5048). Monash University, 1-19.
  22. Johanson, G. (2005d). The Information Continuum: Topic 5 Memoryl(IMS 5048). Monash University, 1-46.
  23. Johanson, G. (2005e). The Information Continuum: Topic 9 Metadata(IMS 5048). Monash University, 1-19.
  24. Johanson, G. (2005f). The Information Continuum: Topic 2 Information Management and the Continuum(IMS 5048). Monash University, 1-20.
  25. Kaufer, D. S. & Carley, K. M. (1993). Communication at a Distance: The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
  26. McKemmish, S. (2001). Placing records continuum theory and practice. Archival Science, 1(4), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438901
  27. McKemmish, S. (2005). Traces: Document, Record, Archive, Archives. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B. & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  28. Myburgh, S. (2002). Strategic information management: understanding a new reality. Information Management Journal, 36(1), 36-43.
  29. Nesmith, T. (2008). Re-exploring the continuum, rediscovering archives. Archives & Manuscripts, 36(2), 34-53.
  30. Oliver, G. (2004). Investigating information culture: a comparative case study research design and methods. Archival Science, 4(3-4), 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-2596-6
  31. Schauder, D., Johanson, G., & Stillman, L. (2005). Sustaining and transforming a community network: the information continuum model and the case of VICNET. Journal of Community Informatics, 1(2), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v1i2.2045
  32. Sprehe, T. (2005). The positive benefits of electronic records management in the context of enterprise content management. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.003
  33. Sutcliffe, P. (2003). Building the corporate memory in the e-environment. Records Management Journal, 13(2), 51-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690310485261
  34. Upward, F. & Stillman, L. (2006). Community Informatics and the Information Processing Continuum. Peer-reviewed Conference Paper for the Conference Proceedings of Constructing and Sharing Memory: Community informatics, Identity and Empowerment, CIRN Prato, 1-33. Available: http://webstylus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/upwardfinal.pdf
  35. Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259
  36. Upward, F. (2005). Continuum mechanics and memory banks(1): multi-polarity. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1), 84-109.
  37. Upward, F., Reed, B., Oliver, G., & Evans, J. (2018). Recordkeeping Informatics for a Networked Age. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.
  38. Wickman, D. (1999). What's new? functional analysis in life cycle and continuum environments. Archives & Manuscripts, 26(1), 114-127.
  39. Yeo, G. (2007). Concepts of record(1): evidence, information, and persistent representations. American Archivist, 70(2), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
  40. Yeo, G. (2018). Records, Information and Data: Exploring the Role of Record-keeping in an Information Culture. London: Facet Publishing.
  41. Yusof, Z. M. & Chell, R. W. (2002). Towards a theoretical construct for records management. Records Management Journal, 12(2), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690210442926