Hip & pelvis

The Korean Hip Society (대한고관절학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biomechanical Comparative Study for Osteosynthesis of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fractures: Conventional Devices versus Novel Fixed Angle Devices

  • Dae-Hyun Park (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Young-Chae Seo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yong-Uk Kwon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Soo-Hwan Jung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Seung-Jin Yoo (R&D Center, IKEY Co., Ltd.)
  • Received : 2021.07.12
  • Accepted : 2021.11.10
  • Published : 2022.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Osteosynthesis has been recommended for treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in young patients. However, no implant of choice has been reported so far. This study was conducted in order to compare the fixation stability of two conventional fixation methods with three different novel fixed angle devices in this type of fracture. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 composite femurs (4th Generation Saw bone; Pacific Research Laboratories, USA) corresponding to human bone were used. Pauwels type III fracture type was uniformly reproduced. Specimens were fixed with a cannulated screw, cannulated screw with cable, and Intertan nail, dynamic hip screw, and IKEY nail. Measurement of failure loads and the rotational change of the femoral head fragment was performed for evaluation of fixation stability. Results: All implants were compared with cannulated screw and dynmaic hip screw. No meaningful improvement was observed for the cannulated screw with cable compared with the cannulated screw and dynamic hip screw. Meaningful improvement in load-to-failure and y-rotation and z-rotation was observed for both the Intertan nail and IKEY nail compared with the cannulated screw. However, compared with the dynamic hip screw, only the IKEY nail showed improvement in the same profile but the Intertan nail did not. Conclusion: Among novel fixed angle devices, meaningful improvement was observed for the IKEY nail compared with conventional implants. Strengths of this implant include biomechanical stability and simplicity of surgical technique, indicating that it may be another good option for osteosynthesis of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Keywords

References

  1. Keating J. Femoral neck fractures. In: Rockwood CA Jr., Green DP, Bucholz RW, eds. Rockwood & Green's fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
  2. Weinlein J. Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Azar FM, Beaty JH, Campbell WC, Canale ST, eds. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017.
  3. Florschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ, Koval KJ. Femoral neck fractures: current management. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:121-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000291
  4. Frihagen F, Figved W, Madsen JE, Lofthus CM, Stoen RO, Nordsletten L.[The treatment of femoral neck fractures]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130:1614-7. Norwegian. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.09.1264
  5. Davidovitch RI, Jordan CJ, Egol KA, Vrahas MS. Challenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the nonelderly adult. J Trauma. 2010;68:236-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c428ce
  6. Sheehan SE, Shyu JY, Weaver MJ, Sodickson AD, Khurana B. Proximal femoral fractures: what the orthopedic surgeon wants to know. Radiographics. 2015;35:1563-84. Erratum in: Radiographics. 2015;35:1624.
  7. Baitner AC, Maurer SG, Hickey DG, et al. Vertical shear fractures of the femoral neck. A biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(367):300-5.
  8. Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, Zhang LQ, Kalainov DM, Merk BR. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:544-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31814b822e
  9. Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, Haidukewych GJ. Results of internal fixation of Pauwels type-3 vertical femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1654-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01353
  10. Haidukewych GJ, Rothwell WS, Jacofsky DJ, Torchia ME, Berry DJ. Operative treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients between the ages of fifteen and fifty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1711-6. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200408000-00015
  11. Cha YH, Yoo JI, Hwang SY, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a systematic review of various fixation methods. Clin Orthop Surg. 2019;11:1-14. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.1
  12. Lindequist S. Cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures. A radiographic analysis of 87 fractures with a new mensuration technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64:289-93. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308993627
  13. Maurer SG, Wright KE, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Two or three screws for fixation of femoral neck fractures? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003;32:438-42.
  14. Parker MJ, Porter KM, Eastwood DM, Schembi Wismayer M, Bernard AA. Intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur. Parallel or crossed garden screws? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:826-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894675
  15. Burkes J, Cannada LK, Olson SA, Schemitsch EH, Kyle RF. New developments in hip fracture treatment to reduce morbidity and mortality. Instr Course Lect. 2021;70:85-100.
  16. Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) Investigators. Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:1519-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30066-1
  17. Kuan FC, Yeh ML, Hong CK, et al. Augmentation by cerclage wire improves fixation of vertical shear femoral neck fracturesa biomechanical analysis. Injury. 2016;47:2081-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.030
  18. Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Ruecker AH, et al. A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. J Trauma. 2011;71:625-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e86e6
  19. Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Sellenschloh K, et al. Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with posterior comminution: a biomechanical comparison of DHS® and Intertan nail®. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1695-701.
  20. Ruecker AH, Rupprecht M, Gruber M, et al. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:22-30. Erratum in: J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:378.
  21. Bennett FS, Zinar DM, Kilgus DJ. Ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(296):168-77.
  22. Wu CC, Shih CH. Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. Retrospective study of 33 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:346-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679108994467
  23. Hossam ElShafie M, Adel Morsey H, Emad Eid Y. Ipsilateral fracture of the femoral neck and shaft, treatment by reconstruction interlocking nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;121:71-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020000161
  24. Jain P, Maini L, Mishra P, Upadhyay A, Agarwal A. Cephalomedullary interlocked nail for ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures. Injury. 2004;35:1031-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.039
  25. Randelli P, Landi S, Fanton F, Hoover GK, Morandi M. Treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures with the Russell-Taylor reconstructive nail. Orthopedics. 1999;22:673-6.
  26. Tan V, Wong KL, Born CT, Harten R, DeLong WG Jr. Two-screw femoral neck fracture fixation: a biomechanical analysis of 2 different configurations. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36:481-5.
  27. Watson JT, Moed BR. Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: complications and their treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(399):78-86.