Analyses & Alternatives (분석과 대안)

Korea Consensus Institute(KCI) (사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Domestic Constraints of Sino-South Korean Environmental Cooperation: the Case of Trans boundary Air Pollution

  • Received : 2022.02.04
  • Accepted : 2022.03.06
  • Published : 2022.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A transboundary environmental problem refers to an environmental problem that goes beyond a country's territory and damages neighboring countries. It is a difficult problem because, basically, it is a natural, rather than intentional, effect, and it is extremely hard to make a scientific consensus on the cause-effect relations between upstream and downstream nations. Air pollution, especially PM 2.5 and PM 10, is one of the typical cases of transboundary environmental problems in the Northeast Asia. This paper analyzes the constraints of environmental cooperation between China and South Korea to address transboundary air pollution issue. It argues that lack of trust and ideological hostility, rather than, scientific uncertainty, is the biggest obstacle for effective cooperation, and these hostile discourses and ideas are mostly generated by media in the downstream nation, the South Korea. In order to identify how South Korean media frames this issue, this paper searched newspaper articles in the six representative South Korean newspapers during the period of 2014 and 2020, and analyzed about 2,000 articles selected. It finds that South Korean media has framed the transboundary air pollution as a China bashing and related domestic political cleavage issue, while it neglects to show the cooperation attempts that the two countries have made to date. Also, while the media focuses on China hate frame, it has never reported the Chinese government's domestic policies to reduce air pollution and their results. Media's overuse of hate and blame frames not only has disrupted trust building but also it will delay a possible turning point of environmental cooperation between the two countries in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Berglez, Peter and Rolf Lidskog. (2019). Foreign, Domestic, and Cultural Factors in Climate Change Reporting: Swedish Media's Coverage of Wildfires in Three Countries. Environmental Communication, 13(3): 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1397040
  2. Haas, Peter M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and Inter-national Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
  3. Watts, Jonathan. (2010). Twitter gaffe: US embassy announces 'crazy bad' Beijing air pollution. The Guardian. (Online Article) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/nov/19/crazy-bad-beijing-air-pollution.
  4. Kim, Sangkyou and Kim, Dongyeon. (2018). Analysis of the Recognition Differences and Cooperation between Korea and China on the Trans-boundary Environmental Pollution Issues: Focusing on Peaceful Conflict Resolution. The Journal of Peace Studies, 19(1): 253-277. (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.14363/kaps.2018.19.1.253
  5. Kim, Yungwook, Lee, Hyunseung, Jang, Yoojin and Lee, Hyejin. (2015). How Does Media Construct Particulate Matter Risks?: A News Frame and Source Analysis on Particulate Matter Risks. Korean Society For Journalism And Communication Studies, 59(2): 121-154. (In Korean).
  6. Korea Electric Power Corporation. (2021). The Monthly Report on Major Electric Power Statistics. 517. (Online Report) file:///C:/Users/jin/Desktop/%EB%AA%85%EC%A7%80/%EC%88%98%EC%A0%95220202/2111_%EC%A0%84%EB%A0%A5%ED%86%B5%EA%B3%84%EC%9B%94%EB%B3%B4(%EC%A0%9C517%ED%98%B8).pdf.
  7. Kwak, Eun A. and Dong Sub Han. (2017). Environmental Risk Communication: An Analysis of News Framing on Fine Dust in Chinese News-papers. Crisisonomy, 13(12): 1-16.
  8. Lee, Taedong and Jeong, Hyeyoon. (2019). Politics of Environmental Cooperation between Korea and China: Comparative Studies of Climate Change and Particulate Matters. Journal of International Area Studies, 23(2): 61-86. (In Korean).
  9. Lee, Taedong and Wooyeal Paik. (2020). Asymmetric barriers in atmospheric politics of transboundary air pollution: a case of particulate matter (PM) cooperation between China and South Korea. International Environmental Agreements, 20(1): 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09463-6
  10. Lim, Jinhee. (2019). China's Recognition and Approach to Trans-boundary Environmental Pollution: Focus on fine dust pollution between Korea and China. Sino-Soviet Affairs, 43(2): 111-146. (In Korean).
  11. Liu, Zhe, Xueli Chen, Jinyang Cai, Tomas Balezentis and Yue Li. (2020). The Impact of "Coal to Gas" Policy on Air Quality: Evidence from Beijing, China. Energies, 13.
  12. Marchiori, Carmen, Simon Dietz and Alessandro Tavoni. (2017). Domestic politics and the formation of international environmental agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81: 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.009
  13. Mitchell, Ronald, Moira L. McConnell, Alexei Roginko and Ann Barett. (1999). "International Vessel-Source Oil Pollution." in Oran R. Young (ed), The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  14. Muhammad, Fikri. (2022). Environmental agreement under the non-interference principle: the case of ASEAN agreement on transboundary haze problem. International Environmental Agreements, 22: 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09545-4
  15. Rhee, Junewoong and Kim, Sunghee. (2018). News frames in the coverage of fine-dust disaster - Application of Structural Topic Modeling. Asian Communication Research, 62(4): 125-158. (In Korean).
  16. Saikawa Eri. (2014). China's War on Air Pollution. China Research Center, 13(2). (Online Document). https://www.chinacenter.net/2014/china_currents/13-2/chinas-war-on-air-pollution/.
  17. Shin, Sangbum and Kang, Myeongji. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Central Environmental Inspection in China-The Case Air Pollution Control Inspections from 2016 to 2019. Korean Chinese Relations Review, 7(2): 1-31.
  18. Schulze, Kai. (2014). Do parties matter for international environmental cooperation? An analysis of environmental treaty participation by advanced industrialised democracies. Environmental Politics, 23(1): 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.740938
  19. Sprinz, Detlef and Tapani Vaahtoranta. (1994). Interest-based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization, 48(1): 77-105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000825
  20. Sussman, Glen. (2004). The USA and Global Environmental Policy: Domestic Constraints on Effective Leadership. International Political Science Review, 25(4): 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512104045077