Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Features of Tent Pavilions in Terms of Nomadism

노마디즘 측면에서 본 텐트 파빌리온의 특성 연구

  • Received : 2022.05.29
  • Accepted : 2022.07.07
  • Published : 2022.07.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed major tent pavilions in terms of the theories of Nomadism in order to understand their features in a historical context. It examined literature research such as theories, papers, and criticisms of tent pavilions and Nomadism. The etymology of the pavilion was covered to broadly grasp the meanings related to the tent and to extract features applicable to the tent pavilions from the theories of Nomadism. These features of Nomadism included vagabondage, hyper-nomadic splendor and symbolism, national hospitality and Dionysian hedonism, Rhizomatic fluid space and nomadic experimentation, and nomad mobility and playing pop-ups. Since modern times, the tent pavilion has changed from a power-oriented ornate symbol to a creative and experimental medium, and has been transformed from a means to strengthen the royal power to a medium for the enjoyment of the public. However, contemporary tent pavilions still contain the philosophy of Nomadism to obtain the driving force to change the present as a social arena where creative ideas from various fields are combined.

Keywords

References

  1. Attali, J. (1998). Dictionaire du XXIe siecle, Jung, H. & Pyun, H. (tr. 1999), Seoul, Joongang M&B, 230-232.
  2. Attali, J. (2003). L'Homme Nomade, Lee, H.. (tr. 2005), Seoul, Woongjinthinkbig, 18, 40, 418-493.
  3. Bergdoll, B. (2009). The Pavilion and the Expanded Possibilities of Architecture, Pavillon, Ostfildern, Hatje Cantz, 13-33.
  4. BuBmann, K. (2009). The Pavilion: A History of Enduring Transience, Pavillon, Ostfildern, Hatje Cantz, 34-48.
  5. Colebrook, C.(2002). Understanding Deleuze, Han, J. (tr. 2007), Seoul, Greenbee, 30-43.
  6. Colomina, B. (2009). Beyond Pavilions: Architecture as a Machine to See, Pavillon, Ostfildern, Hatje Cantz, 68-77.
  7. Deleuze, G.(1968). Difference et Repetition, Kim, S. (tr. 2004), Seoul, Minumsa, 103-105.
  8. DeLorme, E. (1996). Garden Pavilions and the 18th century French Court, Antique Collectors' Club, 13, 235-311.
  9. Drew, P. (2006). A Conundrum in Time : Medieval and Modern Pavilions, Architectural Theory Review, 11(2), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264820609478586
  10. Hirsch, N. (2009). The Pavilionization of Architecture, Pavillon, Ostfildern, Hatje Cantz, 53-58.
  11. Jodidio p. (2011). Serpentine Gallery Pavilions, Koln, Taschen, I.06
  12. Kent, C. (2005). Santiago Calatrava : Milwaukee Art Museum Quadracci Pavilion, New York, Rizzoli, .23-93.
  13. Kim, R. (2019). The Architectural Features of French Garden Pavilions (pavillons) Reflecting Pleasure Culture in the 17th-18th Centuries, Journal of the AIK-Planning & Design, 35(07), 73-80.
  14. Langdon, D. (2015). German Pavilion, Expo '67 by Frei Otto and Rolf Gutbrod, http://www.archdaily.com
  15. Maffesoli, M. (1997), Du Nomadisme : Vagabondages Iinitiatiques, Choi, W. & Choi, H. (tr. 2008), Seoul, Ilshin, 24-88, 129-235.
  16. O'Kane, B. (1993). From Tents to Pavilions: Royal Mobility and Persian Palace Design, Arts Orientalis, 23, 249-268.
  17. Schaik, L. (2015). Introduction, Pavilions, Pop-ups and Parasols, 85(3), 8-15.
  18. Schmal, C. (2009). Pavilion: Between Lusthauslein and Polemics, Pavillon, Ostfildern, Hatje Cantz, 6-11.
  19. Selb, D. (1997). Le Corbusier and the Paris Exhibition of 1937: The Temps Nouveaux Pavilion, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 56(1), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/991215
  20. Zerbe, J., & Connolly, C. (1962). Les Pavillons: French Pavilions of the Eighteenth Century, New York, W. W. Norton& Company, 13-14.
  21. Zuk, W., & Clark, R.(1970). Kinetic Architecture, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 32, 99-100.