Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research (대한의용생체공학회:의공학회지)

The Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering (대한의용생체공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of the Influence of Induced Mood on Rehabilitation Engagement: a Study Focusing on Muscle Activity

  • Kim, Jung-Yeon (ICT convergence research center, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Jung, Bong-Keun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2022.06.03
  • Accepted : 2022.06.11
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Engagement is an important factor in the field of rehabilitation as it is a known factor that have a positive influence on functional gaining in people who receive rehabilitation therapy. Although a number of measurements for engagement have been recently developed, investigation of possible factors that may have influence on engagement is not well established. Currently available evidence suggests that engagement is affected by mood and it is hypothesized that a personal factor may contribute to engagement. Therefore, this study aims to test the hypothetical relationship between mood and engagement while performing a manual dexterity task through an experiment in healthy participants prior to investigation on people with medical condition who requires rehabilitation therapy. After inducing target mood (positive or negative mood) for study participants by asking them to recall autobiographical memories, change in muscle activity, which was operationalized as an indicator of engagement, was investigated. Electromyogram (EMG) was recorded from four muscle areas in non-dominant hand side to quantify muscle activity. The results show that the target moods were appropriately induced with the method. Although there were subtle differences in the level of engagement between different moods, certain variables derived from muscle activity were significantly different; mean amplitude for wrist extensor EMG showed significant difference between different moods (Z = -2.023, p < .05) indicating that muscle activities in the wrist extensor are greater for positive mood than negative mood region during manual dexterity task. Meanwhile, performance outcomes of Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT), such as mean completion time and number of errors, between moods showed no significant difference in two different moods, resulting in MMDT administration may not be useful task in distinguishing the level of rehabilitation engagement.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (A lightweight wearable upper limb rehabilitation robot system and untact self-training and assessment platform customizable for individual patient - No. 1415178513) Funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MOE) (NRF-2020R1I1A1A01073408).

References

  1. Joon-Ho S, et al., "Effects of virtual reality-based rehabilitation on distal upper extremity function and health-related quality of life: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial," (in English), Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 2016;13:2016-08-06, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0125-x.
  2. Chen K, Zdorova M, Nathan-Roberts D, "Implications of wearables, fitness tracking services, and quantified self on healthcare," Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2017;61(1):1066-1070, doi: 10.1177/1541931213601871.
  3. Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S, "A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation," Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2014;11(1):3, 2014/01/09, doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-3.
  4. Gassert R, Dietz V, "Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective," Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2018;15(1):46, 2018/06/05, doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0383-x.
  5. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A, "The concept of patient motivation," A Qualitative Analysis of Stroke Professionals' Attitudes, 2002;33(2):444-448, doi: 10.1161/hs0202.102367.
  6. Lenze EJ, et al., "The pittsburgh rehabilitation participation scale: reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation 1," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004;85(3):380-384, 3//, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.001.
  7. Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, Johnson-Greene D, Wegener ST, "The hopkins rehabilitation engagement rating scale: development and psychometric properties," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2007;88(7):877-884, 7//, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.030.
  8. Park W, Kwon GH, Kim DH, Kim YH, Kim SP, Kim L, "Assessment of cognitive engagement in stroke patients from single-trial EEG during motor rehabilitation," (in eng), IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2015;23(3):351-62, May, doi: 10.1109/tnsre.2014.2356472.
  9. Lequerica AH, et al., "Psychometric properties of the rehabilitation therapy engagement scale when used among individuals with acquired brain injury," Rehabilitation Psychology, 2006;51(4):331-337, doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.51.4.331.
  10. Lequerica AH, Kortte K, "Therapeutic engagement: a proposed model of engagement in medical rehabilitation," American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2010;89(5):415-422, doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181d8ceb2.
  11. MacDonald GA, Kayes NM, Bright F, "Barriers and facilitators to engagement in rehabilitation for people with stroke: a review of the literature," New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, 2013;41(3):112-121.
  12. Goodwin AM, Williams JMG, "Mood-induction research-its implications for clinical depression," Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1982;20(4):373-382, 1982/01/01/, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(82)90097-3.
  13. Bradley MM, Lang PJ, "Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential," (in eng), Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 1994;25(1):49-59, Mar. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
  14. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Hebert R, Bravo G, "The minnesota manual dexterity test: reliability, validity and reference values studies with healthy elderly people," Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1997;64(5):270-276, 1997/12/01, doi: 10.1177/000841749706400504.
  15. Kumar S, Mital A, Electromyography in ergonomics. CRC Press, 1996.
  16. Zimmerli L, Jacky M, Lunenburger L, Riener R, Bolliger M, "Increasing patient engagement during virtual reality-based motor rehabilitation," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2013;94(9):1737-1746, 9//, doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.029.
  17. Li C, Rusak Z, Horvath I, Ji L, "Influence of complementing a robotic upper limb rehabilitation system with video games on the engagement of the participants: a study focusing on muscle activities," (in eng), Int J Rehabil Res, 2014;37(4):334-42, Dec, doi: 10.1097/mrr.0000000000000076.
  18. Cifrek M, Medved V, Tonkovic S, Ostojic S, "Surface EMG based muscle fatigue evaluation in biomechanics," Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2009;24(4):327-40, May, doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.01.010.
  19. Ostir GV, Berges IM, Ottenbacher ME, Clow A, Ottenbacher KJ, "Associations between positive emotion and recovery of functional status following stroke," Psychosomatic Medicine, 2008;70(4):404-409, 04/23, doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816fd7d0.
  20. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, "Performance profiles of the functional independence measure," American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1993;72(2). [Online]. Available: http://journals.lww.com/ajpmr/Fulltext/1993/04000/PERFORMANCE_-PROFILES_OF_THE_FUNCTIONAL.5.aspx.
  21. Frijda NH, The Emotions. Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  22. Brinol P, Petty RE, Barden J, "Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007;93(5):711-727, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.711.
  23. Bodenhausen GV, Kramer GP, Susser K, "Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994;66(4):621-632, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621.
  24. Fisher K, Johnston M, "Emotional distress as a mediator of the relationship between pain and disability: An experimental study," British Journal of Health Psychology, 1996;1(3): 207-218, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1996.tb00503.x.
  25. Jallais C, Gilet AL, "Inducing changes in arousal and valence: comparison of two mood induction procedures," (in eng), Behavior Research Methods, 2010;42(1):318-25, Feb, doi: 10.3758/brm.42.1.318.
  26. Zhang X, Yu HW, Barrett LF, "How does this make you feel? A comparison of four affect induction procedures," Frontiers in Psychology, 5:689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00689