Korean Journal of Environmental Biology (환경생물)

Korean Society of Environmental Biology (한국환경생물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of potential food resources by barn swallow habitat type

제비 서식지 유형에 따른 잠재적 먹이원 비교

  • Received : 2022.12.09
  • Accepted : 2022.12.27
  • Published : 2022.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed habitat status of barn swallows within 800 m and changes in potential food resource occurrence for 63 nests (Seocheon 23, Sejong 40) where barn swallows breeding was confirmed in Seocheon and Sejong in 2019 and 2020. As a result of checking habitat compositions of barn swallows in the study area, Sejong showed more varieties of habitat types than Seocheon, showing a larger number of dominant groups. Such large number of dominant groups was found to be an advantageous habitat factor for producing flying insects as potential food resources for barn swallows. As for the production of potential food resources, Seocheon had the highest production in dwelling and stream and Sejong had the highest production in the stream. The production of potential food resources differed in production season by habitat type. This study analyzed compositions of the habitat around the breeding site of swallows. It provides basic data necessary for protecting barn swallow habitats by comparing the production timing and production volume of potential food resources occurring in the habitat.

본 연구는 2019, 2020년 서천과 세종에서 제비의 번식이 확인된 둥지 63개(서천 23, 세종 40)의 좌표를 대상으로 800m 내 제비의 서식지 현황과 잠재적 먹이원 발생량 변화를 분석하였다. 연구지역 내 제비의 서식지 구성을 확인한 결과 세종이 서천에 비해 다양한 서식지 유형을 보였으며, 다양한 우점군의 출현이 확인되어 제비의 잠재적 먹이원인 비행성 곤충의 발생에 있어 유리한 서식지 요소로 가진 것으로 확인되었다. 잠재적 먹이원 발생량은 서천은 인가와 하천, 세종은 하천에서의 발생량이 가장 높았다. 잠재적 먹이원 발생량은 서식지 유형에 따라 발생시기에 차이를 보였다. 본 연구는 제비의 번식장소 주변의 서식지 유형을 파악하고, 해당 서식지에서 발생되는 잠재적 먹이원의 발생시기와 발생량 비교를 통해 제비의 서식지 보호 및 유치에 필요한 기초자료로 제공하고자 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

제비의 잠재적 먹이원 확보 및 분류에 도움을 주신 국립생태원 장기생태연구팀, 한국환경생태연구소, 국립중앙과학관 분들께 감사드립니다. 본 연구는 국립생태원 "인간활동변화가 제비에 미치는 영향 및 보전 연구(NIE-기반연구-2021-26)"의 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Ambrosini R, AM Bolzern, L Canova, S Arieni, AP Moller and N Saino. 2002. The distribution and colony size of barn swallows in relation to agricultural land use. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:524-534. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00721.x 
  2. Brown CR and MB Brown. 1999. Barn swallow (H. rustica). pp. 1-32. In: The Birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Ithaca, NY. https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.barswa.02 
  3. Burfield I and FV Bommel. 2004. Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. BirdLife International. Cambridge. 
  4. Chloe KB, AM Nancy and TD Williams. 2020. Barn swallow (H. rustica) fledglings use crop habitat more frequently in relation to its availability than pasture and other habitat types. Ornithol. Appl. 122:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duz067 
  5. Choi IS. 1999. Studies on the breeding ecology and group formation behaviours of house swallow, H. rustica, before migration to wintering area. MS Thesis, Kongju University. KongJu, Korea. p. 40. 
  6. Clutton-Brock TH. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. p. 368. 
  7. COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC Annual Report (2010-2011). Committee on the Status Endangered Wildlife in Canada. The Minister of the Environment, Canada. p. 69. 
  8. Cultural Heritage Administration. 2009. Basic Survey of Barn Swallow Habitat for Natural Monument Designation-Chungnam Planning. Cultural Heritage Administration. Daejeon, Korea. p. 209. 
  9. Daan S and JM Tinbergen. 1997. Adaptation of life histories. pp. 311-333. In: Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach (Eds JR Krebs JR and NB Davies, eds.). Wiley-Blackwell. Oxford. 
  10. Danks HV. 2007. The elements of seasonal adaptations in insects. Can. Entomol. 139:1-44. https://doi.org/10.4039/n06-048 
  11. Davidson NC and PR Evans. 1988. Prebreeding accumulation of fat and muscle protein by Arctic-breeding shorebirds. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 19:342-352. 
  12. Downes JA. 1965. Adaptations of insects in the Arctic. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 10:257-274. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.10.010165.001353 
  13. Evans KL, JD Wilson and RB Bradbury. 2007. Effects of crop typeand aerial invertebrates abundance on foraging barn swallows H. rustica. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 122:267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.01.015 
  14. Evans KL, RB Bradbury and JD Wilson. 2003. Selection of hedgerows by swallows H. rustica foraging on farmland: The influence of local habitat and weather. Bird Stud. 50:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650309461284 
  15. Frouz J. 1999. Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptera) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74:167-186 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00036-5 
  16. Fuller RJ. 2000. Relationships between recent changes in lowland British agriculture and farmland bird populations: An overview. pp. 5-16. In: Proceedings of the 1999 British Ornithologists' Union Spring Conference. Ecology and conservation of lowland farmland birds. University of Southampton. Southampton, UK. 
  17. Gruebler M and B Naef-Daenzer. 2003. To feed or not to feed? A trad-off in the post-fledging parental care in the double-brooded barn swallow H. rustica. Vogelwarte. 42:103-104. 
  18. Han HJ. 2009. Nest site selection and breeding ecology of barn swallows. MS Thesis, Kyung Hee University. Seoul, Korea. p. 59. 
  19. Hilden O. 1965. Habitat selection of birds. A review. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 2:53-75. 
  20. Houston AI. 1998. Models of optimal avian migration: state, time and predation. J. Avian Biol. 29:395-404. https://doi.org/10.2307/3677158 
  21. Hur WH, SJ Park, SJ Rhim, YS Park, SY Choi, CB Lee and WS Lee. 2003. Differences in bird communities due to different habitat type in Han River area. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 17:83-91. 
  22. Jang HJ, H Yoon, HR Kwon, YM Yu and YN Youn. 2017. Mass-rearing method of the fungus gnat, Bradysia difformis (Sciaridae, Diptera) in laboratory. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 57:57-64. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2018.01.1.042 
  23. Kim IK and KH Hahm. 2001. A study on the breeding ecology of barn swallow(H. rustica). Korean J. Ornithol. 8:1-9. 
  24. Kim SJ, DP Lee and HS OH. 2016. Nesting and breeding behaviors of barn swallow. pp. 27-28. In: Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference. Korean Society of Environment and Ecology. 
  25. Kim SJ. 2017. Breeding ecology and management of barn swallow (H. rustica) in Korea. Ph. D. Thesis, Jeju University. Jeju, Korea. p. 105. 
  26. Ko JK, JS Han, YS Park and NH Choi. 2010. Analysis of the ecology dynamics of the house swallow. Korean Syst. Dyn. Rev. 11:105-126. 
  27. Lubbe SK and GR de Snoo. 2007. Effect of dairy farm management on swallow H. rustica abundance in the Netherlands. Bird Stud. 54:176-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650709461473 
  28. Mills SG, JB Dunning and JM Bates. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in south-western desert habitats. The Condor 91:416-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368320 
  29. Moller AP. 1983. Changes in Danish farmland habitats and their populations of breeding birds. Holarctic Ecol. 6:95-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1983.tb01070.x 
  30. Moller AP. 1987. Advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the swallow, H. rustica. Anim. Behav. 35:819-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80118-5 
  31. Moller AP. 2001. The effect of dairy farming on barn swallow H. rustica abundance, distribution and reproduction. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:378-389. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00593.x 
  32. Mousseau TA and CW Fox. 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:403-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01472-4 
  33. Newton I. 1979. Population Ecology of Raptors. T & AD Poyser Ltd. Berkhamsted, UK. p. 399. 
  34. Newton I. 1998. Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press. Amsterdam. p. 597. 
  35. Noh DR. 2016. Barn swallow (H. rustica) analysis of factors affecting parent's feeding decision. MS Thesis, Ewha Womans University. Seoul. p. 52. 
  36. Ricklefs RE. 1974. The energetics of reproduction in birds. pp. 152-297. In: Avian Energetics (Paynter RA, ed.). Nuttall Ornithological Club. Cambridge, MA.
  37. Shields WM. 1984. Factors affecting nest and site fidelity in Adirondack barn swallow (H. rustica). The Auk 101:780-789. https://doi.org/10.2307/4086904 
  38. Smith CCR, SM Flaxman, ESC Scordato, NC Kane, AK Hund, BM Sheta and RJ Safran. 2018. Demographic inference in barn swallows using whole-genome data shows signal for bottleneck and subspecies differentiation during the Holocene. Mol. Ecol. 27:4200-4212. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14854 
  39. Snapp BD. 1976. Colonial breeding in the barn swallow (H. rustica) and its adaptive significance. Condor 78:471-480. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367096 
  40. Snow D and CM Perrins. 1998. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Concise Edition. Volume 2 - Passerines. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 
  41. Stanton RL, CA Morrissey and RG Clark. 2018. Analysis of trends and agricultural drivers of farmland bird declines in North America: A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 254:224-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.028 
  42. Turner AK and C Rose. 1989. A Handbook to the Swallows and Martins of the World. Christopher Helm. London. 
  43. Turner AK. 2006. The Barn Swallow. T & AD Poyser. London. 
  44. Williams GC. 1966. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am. Nat. 100:687-690. https://doi.org/10.1086/282461 
  45. Williams TD. 1994. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: Effects on offspring fitness. Biol. Rev. 69:35-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1994.tb01485.x 
  46. Winkler DW and PE Allen. 1996. The seasonal decline in Tree Swallow clutch size: physiological constraint or strategic adjustment? Ecology 77:922-932. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265512 
  47. Won PO. 1981. Illustrated Flora and Fauna of Korea. Avifauna. Department of Education, Korea. pp. 792-799.