DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Family and Community Factors Associated with Life Satisfaction of the Urban Community-dwelling Elderly across Age Groups: Focusing on the Importance of Social Capital

도시 지역 거주 노인의 연령집단별 삶의 만족감에 영향을 미치는 가족 요인과 지역사회 요인: 사회적 자본의 중요성을 중심으로

  • 추현식 (한양대학교 일반대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 이한이 (한양대학교 간호학부)
  • Received : 2022.01.25
  • Accepted : 2022.05.22
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify differences and influencing factors in the level of life satisfaction among the urban community-dwelling elderly by age group. Methods: The study was conducted utilizing the secondary data of 2017 Seoul Survey in a cross-sectional design. Of 42,688 participants in total, the data of 7,927 adults aged 65 or older were analyzed. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, chi-square test, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression. Results: There were significant differences between age groups, and it was found that the old elderly groups had significantly higher life satisfaction than the oldest elderly group (t=8.37, p<.011). In common, family and community factors influencing life satisfaction in the two age groups were companion animals (old elderly: β=.03, p=.002; oldest elderly: β=.06, p=.021), social network (old elderly: β=.10, p<.001; oldest elderly: β=.08, p=.008), and social support (old elderly: β=.05, p<.001; oldest elderly: β=.08, p=.005). Conclusion: Based on these results, social welfare and nursing care services focusing on social capital and age group-specific interventions are needed to improve life satisfaction of the elderly. This study might provide the possibility and evidence for a program to improve life satisfaction for the urban community-dwelling elderly, including social capital elements.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea. 2021 Statistics on the aged [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea. 2021 [cited 2022 January 3]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=403253
  2. Kutubaeva RZ. Analysis of life satisfaction of the elderly population on the example of Sweden, Austria and Germany. Population and Economics. 2019;3(3):102-116. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e47192
  3. Rayner E, Joyce A, Rose J, Twyman M, Clulow C. Human development: An introduction to the psychodynamics of growth, maturity and ageing. 4th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2005. 260 p.
  4. Li CP. Life satisfaction as a predictor of mortality hazard among elderly people in the United Kingdom and Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research. 2013;21(1):26-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0b013e3182828e98
  5. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. How's life? 2020 Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020, 247 p.
  6. Lattman K, Olsson LE, Friman M, Fujii S. Perceived accessibility, satisfaction with daily travel, and life satisfaction among the elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(22):4498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224498
  7. Xie L. Age-friendly communities and life satisfaction among the elderly in urban China. Research on Aging. 2018;40(9):883-905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027518757760
  8. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1979. 330 p.
  9. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. NY:Simon and schuster; 2000. 546 p.
  10. Bormar P. Promoting health in families: Applying family research and theory to nursing practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. 688 p.
  11. McConnell AR, Lloyd EP, Humphrey BT. We are family: Viewing pets as family members improves wellbeing. Anthrozoos. 2019;32(4):459-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1621516
  12. Gonyea JG, Burnes K. Aging well at home: Evaluation of a neighborhood-based pilot project to put connection back into community. Journal of Housing for the Elderly. 2013;27(4):333-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2013.813425
  13. Norstrand JA, Xu Q. Social capital and health outcomes among older adults in China: The urban-rural dimension. The Gerontologist. 2012;52(3):325-334. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr072
  14. Kawachi I, Berkman L. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. NY: Oxford; 2000. p. 290-319.
  15. Lu N, Lum T, Lou VW. The impacts of community social capital on the life satisfaction of older adults in Hong Kong: The moderator role of intergenerational family capital. Aging & Mental Health. 2016;20(11):1213-1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1072799
  16. Koo Y. The study on the factors affecting the elderly employment: Focusing on the comparisons between urban and rural areas. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea. 2016;19(1):104-121. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2016.19.1.104
  17. Kim Y, Lee E. The association between elderly people's sedentary behaviors and their health-related quality of life: Focusing on comparing the young-old and the old-old. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1191-0
  18. Chung K. Policy issues and strategies regarding welfare policies for older persons. Health and Welfare Policy Forum. 2017;(254):18-36. https://doi.org/10.23062/2017.12.3
  19. Larsson K, Thorslund M. Chapter 8: Old people's health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2006;34(67_suppl):185-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034950600677253
  20. Jalenques I, Rondepierre F, Rachez C, Lauron S, Guiguet-Auclair C. Health-related quality of life among community-dwelling people aged 80 years and over: A cross-sectional study in France. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01376-2
  21. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Seoul Survey 2017[Internet]. Seoul:Seoul. 2020 [cited 2021 January 15]. Available from: http://data.seoul.go.kr/dataList/OA-15564/F/1/datasetView.do
  22. Lara E, Martin-Maria N, Forsman AK, Cresswell-Smith J, Donisi V, Adnanes M, et al. Understanding the multi-dimensional mental well-being in late life: Evidence from the perspective of the oldest old population. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2020;21(2):465-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00090-1
  23. Zhang F, Loo BPY, Wang B. Aging in place: From the neighborhood environment, sense of community, to life satisfaction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 2021;1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1985954
  24. Toohey AM, Hewson JA, Adams CL, Rock MJ. Pets, social participation, and aging-in-place: Findings from the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement. 2018;37(2):200-217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980818000107
  25. Choi MY, Kwak HK, Park HS. The effect of community social capital on the elderly's subjective quality of life: Focusing on the mediating effect of the elderly depression. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 2014;66:307-328. https://doi.org/10.21194/kjgsw..66.201412.307
  26. Ammar A, Chtourou H, Boukhris O, Trabelsi K, Masmoudi L, Brach M, et al. COVID-19 home confinement negatively impacts social participation and life satisfaction: A worldwide multicenter study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(17):6237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176237
  27. Abbott R, Orr N, McGill P, Whear R, Bethel A, Garside R, et al. How do "robopets" impact the health and well-being of residents in care homes? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 2019;14(3):e12239. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12239
  28. Kim JK. Cases and issues in caring for older adults using AI/ robots during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. International Social Security Review. 2021;(16):16-26. https://doi.org/10.23063/2021.03.2
  29. Costa C, Gilliland G, McWatt J. 'I want to keep up with the younger generation' - Older adults and the web: A generational divide or generational collide? International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2019;38(5):566-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2019.1678689
  30. Fastame MC. Life satisfaction in late adult span: the contribution of family relationships, health self-perception and physical activity. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2021; 33:1693-1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01658-1