한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제55권6호
  • /
  • Pages.421-435
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기후변화 적응을 위한 우리나라 수문학적 가뭄 위험도 평가

Hydrological drought risk assessment for climate change adaptation in South Korea

  • 서정호 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 지혜원 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 김혜진 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 김연주 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Seo, Jungho (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chi, Haewon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Heey Jin (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Yeonjoo (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.24
  • 심사 : 2022.05.02
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기후변화로 인해 자연재해의 빈도가 증가하고 있어 미래 기후변화 시나리오를 바탕으로 가뭄 영향을 평가 및 전망하고 가뭄 위험도 감소를 위한 기후변화 적응 대책이 필요하다. 가뭄 위험도(risk)를 평가하기 위해서는 기후 요소뿐만 아니라 가뭄 발생 지역의 사회·경제적인 요소들 또한 고려해야 한다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 IPCC의 재난 위험도 분석 프레임워크에 따라 가뭄 위험도 평가 요소를 위해성(Hazard), 노출도(Exposure), 취약성(Vulnerability)으로 나누고 이에 맞는 각 지표를 선정하여 우리나라 중권역 단위의 가뭄 위험도를 정량화하였다. 미래 가뭄 위험도 평가를 위해 근 미래(2030-2050년)와 먼 미래(2080년-2099년)에 대해 기후변화 시나리오(RCP 2.6, RCP 8.5)와 사회경제 시나리오(SSP1, SSP2, SSP3)를 조합하여 가뭄 위험도를 살펴보고 이를 과거(1986-2005년)와 비교·분석하였다. 미래 시나리오에 따른 가뭄 위험도는 시간에 따라 전 유역에 걸쳐 먼 미래에 크게 상승하였다. 그리고 가뭄 위험도의 각 요소별 기여도와 순위 분석을 통해 미래 가뭄 위험도 상승에 대해 가뭄 위해성의 기여도가 전반적으로 크고, 유역별로 상승 요인이 다르다는 것을 확인했다. 이에 미래 기후변화 시나리오에 따른 유역별 해결 방안을 제시하여 향후 가뭄대책 수립을 위한 정책에 기반이 될 수 있도록 하였다.

As natural disasters have been increasing due to climate change, sustainable solutions are in need to alleviate the degree of drought hazard, assess and project the drought influence based on future climate change scenarios. In assessing drought risk, socio-economic factors of the region must be considered along with meteorological factors. This study categorized drought hazard, exposure, and vulnerability as three major components of drought risk according to the Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change (IPCC) risk assessment framework, and selected indices for each component to quantify the drought risk in South Korea according to the mid-size basins. Combinations of climate scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathway; RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5) and socio-economic scenarios (Shared Socio-economic Pathways; SSP 1, SSP2 and SSP3) for the near future (2030-2050) ant the far future (2080-2099) were utilized in drought risk analysis, and results were compared with the historical data (1986-2005). In general, the drought risks for all scenarios shows large increases as time proceeds to the far furture. In addition, we analyzed the rank of drought hazard, exposure, vulnerability for drought risk, and each of their contribution. The results showed that the drought hazard is the most contributing component to the increase of drought risk in future and each basin shows varying contributing components. Finally, we suggested countermeasures for each basin according to future climate change scenarios, and thus this study provides made the basis for establishing drought management measures.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국제수문개발계획(IHP) 9단계와 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단(2020R1A2C2007670)의 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. Ahmadalipour, A., Moradkhani, H., and Demirel, M.C. (2017). "A comparative assessment of projected meteorological and hydrological droughts: Elucidating the role of temperature." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 553, pp. 785-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.047
  2. Carrao, H., Naumann, G., and Barbosa, P. (2016). "Mapping global patterns of drought risk: An empirical framework based on sub-national estimates of hazard, exposure and vulnerability." Global Environmental Change, Vol. 39. pp. 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.012
  3. Chae, Y.R., Lee, J.H., and Chris, H. (2017). Economic analysis of climate change damage in Korea using SSP-RCP scenario matrix. Korea Environment Institute, pp. 56-72.
  4. Cho, K.W., and Kim, Y.J. (2022). "Improving streamflow prediction in the WRF-Hydro model with LSTM networks." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 605, 127297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127297
  5. Dai, A. (2011). "Drought under global warming: A review." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.81
  6. Gochis, D.J., Barlage, M., Dugger, A., FitzGerald, A., Karsten, L., McAllister, M., McCreight, J., Mills, J., RafieeiNasab, A., Read, L., Sampson, K., Yates, D., and Yu, W. (2018). National Center for Atmospheric Research, accessed 13 April 2018, .
  7. Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K.S. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  8. Im, E.S., Thanh, N.X., Kim, Y.H., and Ahn, J.B. (2019). "2018 summer extreme temperatures in South Korea and their intensification under 3℃ global warming." Envrionmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, No. 9, 094020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3b8f
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland.
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018). An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, Geneva, Switzerland.
  11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis, IPCC contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge United Kingdom and New York, NY, U.S.
  12. Jaranilla-Sanchez, P.A., Wang, L., and Koike, T. (2011). "Modeling the hydrologic responses of the Pampanga River basin, Philippines: A quantitative approach for identifying droughts." Water Resources Research, Vol. 47, W03514. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009702
  13. Kim, H.S., Park, J.Y., Yoo, J.Y., and Kim, T.W. (2015a). "Assessment of drought hazard, vulnerability, and risk: A case study for administrative districts in South Korea." Journal of Hydro-environment Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2013.07.003
  14. Kim, J.S. (2015). Alleviating the current drought condition in Gangwon region, issues and perspectives. No. 963, The National Assembly Research Service (NARS).
  15. Kim, J.S., and Kim K.M. (2018). Alleviating the current drought management condition. Vol. 3, National Assembly Research Service.
  16. Kim, M.J., Gang, H.Y., O, T.S., and Park, J.S. (2017). "Drought occurrence and outlook in 2017." Water for Future, KWRA, Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 56-61.
  17. Kim, Y.J., and Chung, E.S. (2013). "Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea." Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 37, pp. 9419-9430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.040
  18. Kim, Y.J., and Chung, E.S. (2014). "An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate." Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 473-474, pp. 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.002
  19. Kim, Y.J., Chung, E.S., and Jun, S.M. (2015b). "Iterative framework for robust reclaimed wastewater allocation in a changing environment using multi-criteria decision making." Water Resources Management, Vol. 29, pp. 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0891-9
  20. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) (2017). Korean Peninsula climate change outlook report.
  21. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) (2020). Climate Change Analysis Report for 109 years in South Korea.
  22. K-water (2002). Report of drought monitoring system of measure establishment study.
  23. Lee, J.H., Kim, Y.J., and Chae, Y.R. (2020). "Projecting future hydrological and ecological droughts with the climate and land use scenarios over the Korean peninsula." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 427-436. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2020.53.6.427
  24. Lee, J.H., Kim, Y.J., and Wang, D. (2022). "Assessing the characteristics of recent drought events in South Korea using WRF-Hydro." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 607, 127459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127459
  25. Lee, J.H., Park, S.Y., Kim, M.G., and Chung, I.M. (2021). "Hydrological drought analysis and monitoring using multiple drought indices: The case of Mulrocheon watershed." Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 477-484.
  26. Lee, S.E. (2015). On the development of the methodological framework for drought risk assessment. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  27. McKee, T.B., Doesken, N.J., and Kleist, J. (1993). "The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales." In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, AMS, Anaheim, CA, U.S., Vol. 17, No. 22. pp. 179-183.
  28. Ministry of Environment (ME) (2020). Korean climate change assessment report 2020. pp. 30-68.
  29. Naabil, E., Lamptey, B.L., Arnault, J., Olufayo, A., and Kunstmann, H. (2017). "Water resources management using the WRF-Hydro modelling system: Case-study of the Tono dam in West Africa." Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, Vol. 12, pp. 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.05.010
  30. O'Neill, B.C., Krigler, E., Riahi, K., Ebi, K.L., Hallegatte, S., Carter, T.R., Mathur, R., and van Vuuren, D.P. (2014). "A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways." Climatic Change, Vol. 122, pp. 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
  31. Pulwarty, R.S., and Sivakumar, M.V.K. (2014). "Information systems in a chaning climate: Early warnings and drought risk management." Weather and Climate Extremes, Vol. 3, pp. 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2014.03.005
  32. Shahid, S., and Behrawan, H. (2008). "Drought risk assessment in the western part of Bangladesh." Natural Hazards, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9191-5
  33. Sheffield, J., and Wood, E.F. (2008). "Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulation." Climate Dynamics, Vol. 31, pp. 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0340-z
  34. Sherwood, S., and Fu, Q. (2014). "A drier future?" Science, Vol. 343, No. 6172, pp. 737-739. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247620
  35. Shukla, S., and Wood, A.W. (2008). "Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought." Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, L02405. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032487
  36. Sim, O.B., Kim, K., Han, W.S., and Koo, H.S. (2011). Research for water management policy preparing with climate change-Focus on drought vulnerability and policy plan of territory. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  37. Sohn, K.H., Bae, D.H., and Ahn, J.H. (2014). "Projection and analysis of drought according to future climate and hydrological information in Korea." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 71-82. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2014.47.1.71
  38. Song, Y.H., Chung, E.S., and Sung, J.H. (2019). "Selection framework of representative general circulation models using the selected best bias correction method." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 337-347. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2019.52.5.337
  39. Taebaek-si (2009). A drought white paper.
  40. Um, M.J., Kim, Y.J., and Park, D.R. (2018). "Evaluation and modification of the Drought Severity Index (DSI) in East Asia." Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 209, pp. 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.044
  41. Um, M.J., Kim, Y.J., Park, D.R., and Kim, J.B. (2017). "Effects of different reference peroids on drought index estimations for 1901-2014." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 10, pp. 4989-5007. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4989-2017
  42. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2005). Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measures, Cambridge University. Press, Cambridge.
  43. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2009). Drought risk reduction framework and practives: Contributing to the implementation of the hyogo framework for action. Geneva, Switzerland.
  44. Vincente-Serrano, S.M., Begueria, S., and Lopez-Moreno, J.I. (2010). "A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index." Journal of Climate, Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 1696-1718. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
  45. Wilhite, D.A. (2000). "Drought as a natural hazard: Concepts and definitions." Drought: A global assessment, Routledge Publishers, UK.
  46. Wilhite, D.A., and Pulwarty, R.S. (2005). Drought and water crises: Science, technology, and management issues (1st ed.). CRC Press, FL, U.S., pp. 389-398. doi: 10.1201/9781420028386