DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Environmental cooperation strategies of Korean Peninsula considering International Environmental Regimes

한반도 환경협력을 위한 국제사회 동향과 미래 협력방안

  • Chul-Hee Lim (College of General Education, Kookmin University) ;
  • Hyun-Ah Choi (Korea Office, Hanns Seidel Foundation)
  • 임철희 (국민대학교 교양대학) ;
  • 최현아 (한스자이델재단 한국사무소)
  • Received : 2022.06.07
  • Accepted : 2022.06.23
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

North Korea has actively participated in the international community related to environmental agreements. It has proposed various environmental policies internally since the Kim Jong-un regime. In particular, it emphasizes activities related to climate change response, the Sustainable Development Goals, and the conservation of ecosystems including forests and wetlands. In this study, a new security cooperation plan was proposed with an understanding of the climate crisis and environmental regime as a starting point. To this end, trends and recent activities for climate-environment cooperation in the international community and on the Korean Peninsula were analyzed. In addition, North Korea's conditions for cooperation on the Korean Peninsula, technology demand, and the projected future environment of the Korean Peninsula were dealt with. Ultimately, through advice of experts, we were able to discover cooperation agendas by sector and propose short-term and long-term environmental cooperation strategies for the Korean Peninsula based on them. In this study, conditions and directions for cooperation in fields of climate technology, biological resources, air/weather, water environment, biodiversity, renewable energy, bioenergy, and so on were considered comprehensively. Among 21 cooperation agendas discovered in this study, energy showed the largest number of areas. Renewable energy, forest resources, and environmental and meteorological information stood out as agendas that could be cooperated in the short term. As representative initiatives, joint promotion of 'renewable energy' that could contribute to North Korea's energy demand and carbon neutrality and 'forest cooperation' that could be recognized as a source of disaster reduction and greenhouse gas sinks were suggested.

지금까지 북한의 환경실태 분석과 환경협력에 대한 연구는 주로 특정 지역이나 특정 부문을 중심으로 이루어져 왔다. 그러나 기후변화 대응과 현재의 코로나19 전염병 대유행 상황을 극복하기 위해서는 국경을 넘어선 협력과 연대가 필수적이다. 기후위기 상황에서 북한의 환경 현안은 산림, 습지 등 육상 생태계, 식수위생, 식량안보, 영양, 보건서비스 등과 연관이 있으며, 이를 개선하기 위한 지원과 국제사회와의 협력이 필요하다. 북한은 환경협약 관련 국제사회에 적극적으로 참여하였고, 내부적으로도 김정은 정권 이후 다양한 환경관련 정책을 제시하면서, 기후변화 대응, 물관리, 지속가능발전목표(SDGs), 산림, 습지를 포함한 생태계 보전관련 활동 등을 강조하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기후위기·환경레짐에 대한 이해를 출발점으로 하는 새로운 패러다임의 신안보협력방안을 제안하였다. 또한, 그동안 제기되어 온 과거 남북교류협력의 문제점을 개선하고 대내외적으로 변화한 환경에 대응하는 전략을 모색하였다. 이를 위해 국제사회와 한반도에서의 기후환경협력 동향과 최근 활동들을 분석하였다. 또한, 한반도 협력을 위한 북한의 여건과 기술 수요, 전망된 한반도의 미래환경을 다루었다. 궁극적으로 전문가들의 자문을 통해 분야별 협력의제를 발굴하고 이를 기반으로 장·단기적인 한반도의 환경협력전략을 제시할 수 있었다. 본 연구에서는 기존 연구에서 다루지 않았던 한반도 차원의 미래환경 공동대응 기반 마련과 함께 생태공동체 조성을 위한 기후기술과 환경·생물자원, 대기·기상, 물환경, 생물다양성, 에너지 환경기술, 신재생에너지, 바이오에너지 등 신안보 분야 협력 여건과 방향, 그리고 국제 환경레짐 안에서 진행할 수 있는 협력 방향 등을 종합적으로 고려하였다. 본 연구에서 발굴한 21가지 협력의제 중 에너지가 가장 많은 분야를 보였고, 단기적으로 협력 가능한 의제로는, 신재생에너지, 산림자원, 환경·기상정보 등이 두드러졌다. 대표적인 추진방안으로는 북한의 에너지 수요와 탄소중립 이행에 기여할 수 있는 '신재생에너지'와 재해저감과 온실가스 흡수원으로 인정받을 수 있는 '산림협력'의 공동추진이 제시되었다. 다만, 본 연구에서는 현재의 대북제재 상황이나 코로나 19 상황에 따른 북한의 봉쇄 상황 등을 고려하지 않고 남북기후·환경협력을 위한 공동의제와 의제에 따른 유형을 분류한 것이다. 이번 결과를 중심으로 관련 후속 연구가 진행되어야 할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서 제시한 신재생에너지, 산림자원, 대기·기상, 물환경, 바이오에너지, 생물다양성, 환경·생물자원, 기후변화 적응 등 분야별 협력방안에 대해 남북이 공동으로 추진 시 단계적 접근 방향과 고려사항, 추진체계, 부문별 구체적인 세부 협력방안, 그리고 부문 간 연계를 통한 협력방안 등이 후속 연구로 진행되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 통일부의 정책연구과제와 한국연구재단 남북과학기술협력사업(과제번호: 2022K1A5A2067157)의 지원으로 수행되었습니다. 또한, 협력의제 발굴을 위한 자문해주신 분야별 전문가분들께 감사드립니다.

References

  1. Bae YJ, K Cho, GS Min, BJ Kim, JO Hyun, JH Lee, HB Lee, JH Yoon, JM Hwang and JH Yum. 2021. Review of the Korean indigenous species investigation project (2006-2020) by the National Institute of Biological Resources under the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 39:1197135. 
  2. Baquedano F, C Christensen, K Ajewole and J Beckman. 2020. International Food Security Assessment, 2020-30. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Washington D.C., U. S .A. 
  3. Choi E, R Kim and M Kim. 2018. Trends and implication of international discussion on forest sector: Focusing on United Nations forum on forests. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 107:325-335. 
  4. Choi HY. 2019. Environmental policy in the Kim Jong Un regime and implementation strategy of the cooperation: Focusing on DPRK's activities for wetland biodiversity conservation. Unification Policy Stud. 28:63-81. 
  5. Choi HY. 2020. Sustainable development goals and possible cooperation with DPRK: Focusing on capacity building for the land environment management. Korean J. Unification Affairs 32:95-120.  https://doi.org/10.46561/KUA.2020.32.2.04
  6. Choi HY and CH Lim. 2021. Forest Cooperation with North Korea based on Analysis of the Characteristics of North Korea's Forest Research. Review of North Korean Studies. 24:88-111.  https://doi.org/10.17321/RNKS.2021.24.1.003
  7. Chu JM. 2019. The Environmental Research Roadmap for the Sustainable Korean Peninsul. Korea Environment Institute. Sejong, 
  8. Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). 2016. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Democratic People's Republic of Korea. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC). 
  9. Dill C, A Naegele, N Baillargeon, M Caparas, D Dusseau, R Fleishman, CR Schwalm and C Churchill. 2021. Converging Crises in North Korea: Security, Stability, and Climate Change. Policy Brief. Woodwell Climate Research Center. Falmouth, MA. 
  10. FAOSTAT. 2020. Land Use. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Rome. 
  11. GAHP. 2019. Pollution and Health Metrics: Global, Regional, and Country Analysis, December 2019. Global Alliance on Health and Pollution. 
  12. Harmeling S and D Eckstein. 2013. Global Climate Risk Index 2013. Germanwatch. Bonn, Germany. 
  13. IPCC. 2014. Summary for policymakers. pp. 1-32. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY. 
  14. Joung E. 2016. A study on exchages and infrastructures between Dandong City and North Korea. J. Northeast Asian Stud. 78:27-52. 
  15. KACCC. 2022. Information Portal for National Climate Crisis Adaptation. Korea Adaptation Center for Climate Crisis. https://kaccc.kei.re.kr/portal/. Sejong, Korea.
  16. KEEI. 2021. World Energy Market Insight. Korea Energy Economic Institute. Ulsan, Korea. pp. 21-12. 
  17. Kim Y, S Yun and SH Lee. 2018. Small scale renewable energy development as a strategy for inter-Korean cooperation. Environ. Law Pol. 21:131-165.  https://doi.org/10.18215/elvlp.21..201809.131
  18. Kim BY, M Kim and D Kim. 2020. The effects of North Korea's mineral export on various imports. Econ. Anal. 26:72-113. 
  19. Kim K. 2020a. Weekly KDB Report (2020.11.23.). KDB Future Strategy Institute. Korea Development Bank. Seoul. 
  20. Kim K. 2020b. Weekly KDB Report (2020.09.14.). KDB Future Strategy Institute. Korea Development Bank. Seoul. 
  21. Kim KS, J Kim, J Park, CH Cha, YJ Kim, T Kim and YH Song. 2020. Comparative study of SDGs implementation in North and South Korea. J. Int. Relations 23:757109. 
  22. Kim KS. 2021. North Korea's Renewable Energy Development Status and International Cooperation Direction. KDB North Korea Development. Korea Development Bank. Seoul. 
  23. Klenert D, F Funke, L Mattauch and B O'Callaghan. 2020. Five lessons from COVID-19 for advancing climate change mitigation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 76:751-778.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00453-w
  24. KMA. 2020. Climate Change Projection Report on Korean Peninsula. Korea Meteorological Administration. Seoul. 
  25. Kwak DJ. 2018. North Korea's Energy and Electricity Status and the Direction of Inter-Korean Cooperation in the Solar Power Sector. Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade. Sejong, 
  26. Lim CH, C Song, Y Choi, SW Jeon and WK Lee. 2019. Decoupling of forest water supply and agricultural water demand attributable to deforestation in North Korea. J Environ. Manage. 248:109256. 
  27. Lim CH. 2021. Water-Centric Nexus approach for the agriculture and forest sectors in response to climate change in the Korean Peninsula. Agronomy 11:1657. 
  28. Lim CH and HY Choi. 2021a. Ecosystem service-based economic valuation of forest restoration in North Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 39:225-235.  https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2021.39.2.225
  29. Lim CH and HY Choi. 2021b. Directions of sustainable cooperation to improve living environment in North Korea: Focusing on humanitarian aid to DPRK of international community. J. Future Korea Stud. 5:111-132. 
  30. Moon K and K Chung. 2018. SDG and Peace of Korean Peninsula. UNESCO Korea. Seoul. 
  31. Myeong S. 2017. Environmental Cooperation to Improve the Environmental Quality in North Korea through Environment Infrastructures. Korea Environment Institute. Sejong, Korea.
  32. Park J, K Moon and D Jo. 2016. A study on SDG indicator of North Korea and its discourse. Discourse 19:123-147.  https://doi.org/10.17789/discou.2016.19.4.005
  33. Perkins KM, N Munguia, M Ellenbecker, R Moure-Eraso and L Velazquez. 2021. COVID-19 pandemic lessons to facilitate future engagement in the global climate crisis. J. Clean. Prod. 290:125178. 
  34. Steffen W, K Richardson, J Rockstrom, SE Cornell, I Fetzer, EM Bennett, ... and S Sorlin. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855. 
  35. UNEP. 2020. United Nations Environment Program. https://www.unep.org/environmentassembly/unea-5.2/statements(Accessed 2022/6/6). 
  36. World Bank. 2021. World Development Indicators - September 15 update. World Bank. Washington D.C. 
  37. Yoon IJ. 2020. A study on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14 'Life below Water' and development cooperation with North Korea. Ocean Pol. Res. 35:153-178.