Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New methodologies to derive discharge limits considering operational flexibility of radioactive effluents from Korean nuclear power plants based on historical discharge data

  • Received : 2021.07.30
  • Accepted : 2021.09.06
  • Published : 2022.03.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The new methodologies to derive discharge limits considering operational flexibility according to international safety standards were developed to help reduce the environmental releases of radioactive effluents from nuclear power plants (NPPs). To overcome the limitations of the two existing methods to set up discharge limits assuming a specific statistical distribution of the effluent discharge, two modified equations were newly proposed to directly derive a particular discharge limits corresponding to the target 'compliance probability' based on the actual annual discharge data for a specific NPP and radionuclide groups. By applying these to the actual yearly discharge data of 14 Korean NPPs for 7 radionuclide groups for the past 20 years, the applicability of two new methodologies to actual cases was demonstrated. The 'characteristic value' with approximately a 90% compliance probability for each Korean NPP and radionuclide group was proposed based on the results. The new approaches for setting up the discharge limits and the characteristic values developed in this study are expected to be effectively utilized to foster operator's efforts to progressively reduce the environmental releases of radioactive effluents of NPPs relative to the previous discharge data considering operational flexibilities.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS), granted financial resource from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (No.2003017).

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, General Safety Requirements No. GSR Part, 3, IAEA, Vienna, 2014.
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency, Regulatory Control of Radioactive Discharges to the Environment, General Safety Guide No. GSG-9, IAEA, Vienna, 2018.
  3. Environment Agency, Developing Guidance for Setting Limits on Radioactive Discharges to the Environment from Nuclear Licensed Sites, Science Report SC0010034/SR, EA, London, 2005.
  4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency, Effluent Release Options from Nuclear Installations, OECD/NEA, MA, USA, 2003, ISBN 92-64-02146-9.
  5. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities; Numerical Guides for Design Objectives and Limiting Conditions for Operation to Meet the Criterion "As Low as Is Reasonably Achievable" for Radioactive Material in Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Reactor Effluents, Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 50, Appendix I, USNRC, Washington, 2021.
  6. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standards for Protection against Radiation; Annual Limits on Intake (ALIs) and Derived Air Concentrations (DACs) of Radionuclides for Occupational Exposure; Effluent Concentrations; Concentrations for Release to Sewerage, Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 20, Appendix B, USNRC, Washington, 2021.
  7. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Standards for Radiation Protection, Etc., 2019. Notice No. 2019-10.
  8. J.H. Cheong, Calculation of risk-based detection limits for radionuclides in the liquid effluents from Korean nuclear power plants, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 54 (9) (2017) 957-968. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1331765
  9. Environment Agency, Assessing New Nuclear Power Station Designs Generic Design Assessment of General Nuclear System Limited's UK HPR1000, Consultation Document version 1, EA, London, 2021.
  10. Hitachi-Ge Nuclear Energy Ltd, UK ABWR Generic Design Assessment Quantification of Discharges and Limits, HE-GD-0004 Revision G, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, 2017.
  11. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Process for Establishing Release Limits and Action Levels at Nuclear Facilities, Discussion Paper DIS-12-02, CNSC, Ottawa, 2012.
  12. European Commission, Verifications under the Terms of Article 35 of the Euratom Treaty-PAKS Nuclear Power Plant Hungary, Technical Report HU-04/4, EC, Luxembourg, 2005.
  13. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Standard Format and Content of the Discharge Plan of Liquid and Gaseous Radioactive Materials from Nuclear Power Plant and Related Facilities, 2017. Notice No. 2017-4.
  14. Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co. Ltd, Final Safety Analysis Report of Kori Unit 2, KHNP, Gyeongju, 2008.
  15. Environmental Protection Agency, Understanding and Accounting for Method Variability in Whole Effluent Toxicity Applications under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, EPA 833-R-00-003, EPA, Washington, 2000.
  16. Y. Zhou, N. Duan, X. Wu, H. Fang, COD discharge limits for urban wastewater treatment plants in China based on statistical methods, Water 10 (6) (2018) 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060777
  17. Y. Zhou, J. Lei, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, Y. Lu, X. Wu, H. Fang, Determining discharge characteristics and limits of heavy metals and metalloids for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in China based on statistical methods, Water 10 (9) (2018) 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091248
  18. Environmental Protection Agency, Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines New Source Performance Standards and Pretreatment Standards for the Organic Chemicals and the Plastics and Synthetic Fibers Point Source Category, ume 1, EPA, Washington, 1987.
  19. International Atomic Energy Agency, RAdioactive discharges databases (RADD), Available online: https://europa.eu/radd/ (accessed on 8 June 2021).
  20. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities; General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants, Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 50, Appendix A, USNRC, Washington, 2021.
  21. Entergy, Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 and Unit 2-2019 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, USNRC, Washington, 2020.
  22. Korean Institute of Nuclear Safety, Waste System and Environmental Discharges Radiation Source, KINS/RG-N12.01, 2015.
  23. Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co Ltd, APR 1400 Design Control Document Tire 2, Radioactive Waste Management, Revision 3, APR1400-K-X-FS-14002-NP, USNRC, Washington, 2018.
  24. Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co Ltd, Survey of Radiation Environment and Assessment of Radiological Impact on Environment in Vicinity of Nuclear Power Facilities, KHNP, Gyeongju, 2018.
  25. Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co, Ltd, Radiation management yearbook, KHNP, Gyeongju, 2009.
  26. J.S. Kang, J.H. Cheong, Characteristics of radioactive effluent releases from pressurized water reactors after permanent shutdown, Energies 13 (10) (2020) 2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102436
  27. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidance for Data Quality Assessment: Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, EPA, Washington, 2000.
  28. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Radioactive Release Data from Canadian Nuclear Power Plants 2001-10, INFO-0210 Revision 14, CNSC, Ottawa, 2012.
  29. Oslo, Paris Commissions, Liquid Discharges from Nuclear Installations in 2016, OSPAR, London, UK, 2018.
  30. General Nuclear System Limited, Chapter 6 Quantification of Discharges Limits, Pre Construction Environmental Report HPR-GDA-PCER-0006, Revision 1, UK HPR1000 GDA Requesting Party, 2020.
  31. Environment Agency, Criteria for Setting Limits on the Discharge of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Sites, Environmental Permitting Regulations (England and Wales), EA, London, UK, 2012.
  32. Environment Agency, Study of Historical Nuclear Reactor Discharge Data, Better Regulation Science Programme, Science Report SC070015/SR1, EA, London, UK, 2009.
  33. European Commission, Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Stations and Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plants in European Community (1976-1980), EC, Luxembourg, 1983.
  34. The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, ume 1, UNSCEAR, Vienna, Austria, 2000.
  35. Richard Taylor, Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review, J. Diagn. Med. Sonogr. 6 (1) (1990) 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106
  36. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Regarding Concrete Voids of Containment Buildings of Hanbit Unit 3 and 4, the NSSC Will Verify Structural Integrity Objectively and Transparently, Press Releases, NSSC, Seoul, Korea, 2020.
  37. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Calculation of Releases of Radioactive Materials in Gaseous and Liquid Effluents from Pressurized Water Reactors, NUREG-0017, USNRC, Washington, DC, USA, 2020. Revision 2.
  38. T.Y. Kong, S.Y. Kim, Y.J. Lee, J.K. Son, S.J. Maeng, Radioactive effluent release from Korean nuclear power plants and the resulting radiation doses to members of the pubic, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 49 (8) (2017) 1772-1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.07.021
  39. J.T. Harris, D.W. Miller, Radiological effluents released by U.S. commercial NPP from 1995-2005, Health Phys. 95 (6) (2008) 734-743. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000324201.89669.30
  40. European Commission, Word definition, coefficient of variation, Available online, https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wordef/coefficient-of-variation. (Accessed 30 June 2021).
  41. International Atomic Energy Agency, Management of Waste Containing Tritium and Carbon-14, Technical Reports Series No. 421, IAEA, Vienna, 2004.
  42. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants-Annual Report 2018, NUREG/CR-2907, 24, USNRC, Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  43. J.T. Harris, Radiological releases and environmental monitoring at commercial nuclear power plants, in: T. Pavel (Ed.), Nuclear Power-Operation, Safety and Environment, InTech, London, 2011, pp. 237-260.
  44. J.U. Cheong, S.W. Kim, H.G. Cheong, J. Lim, S.I. Cheong, J.U. Kim, Comparison of tritium concentration in the environment around PHWR, in: Korean Radioactive Waste Society Autumn Meeting, Busan, Korea, October 14-16, 2015.
  45. K.M. Song, S.H. Sohn, D.W. Kang, H.S. Chung, Introduction to Wolsong tritium removal facility (WTRF), in: Transaction of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Busan, Korea, October 27-28, 2005.
  46. Oracle And/or its Affiliate, Oracle Crystal Ball Software User Manual, Version 11.2.4