Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitivity analysis of input variables to establish fire damage thresholds for redundant electrical panels

  • Kim, Byeongjun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jaiho (Department of Reactor System Evaluation, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety) ;
  • Shin, Weon Gyu (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2021.04.17
  • Accepted : 2021.07.28
  • Published : 2022.01.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the worst case, a temporary ignition source (also known as transient combustibles) between two electrical panels can damage both panels. Mitigation strategies for electrical panel fires were previously developed using fire modeling and risk analysis. However, since they do not comply with deterministic fire protection requirements, it is necessary to analyze the boundary values at which combustibles may damage targets depending on various factors. In the present study, a sensitivity analysis of input variables related to the damage threshold of two electrical panels was performed for dimensionless geometry using a Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). A new methodology using a damage evaluation map was developed to assess the damage of the electrical panel. The input variables were the distance between the electrical panels, the vertical height of the fuel, the size of the fire, the wind speed and the wind direction. The heat flux was determined to increase as the vertical distance between the fuel and the panel decreased, and the largest heat flux was predicted when the vertical separation distance divided by one half flame length was 0.3-0.5. As the distance between the panels increases, the heat flux decreases according to the power law, and damage can be avoided when the distance between the fuel and the panel is twice the length of the panel. When the wind direction is east and south, to avoid damage to the electrical panel the distance must be increased by 1.5 times compared to no wind. The present scale model can be applied to any configuration where combustibles are located between two electrical panels, and can provide useful guidance for the design of redundant electrical panels.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by research fund of Chungnam National University.

References

  1. U.S. NRC, Fire Protection for Operating Nuclear Power Plants (Regulatory Guide 1.189), United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 2009.
  2. J. Lee, F. Joglar, U. Farradj, A. Ratchford, Fire risk assessment to develop a compliance strategy for sample redundant electrical panels at a nuclear power plant based on deterministic fire protection requirements, Prog. Nucl. Energy 128 (2020).
  3. J. Lee, Numerical analysis on the rapid fire suppression using a water mist nozzle in a fire compartment with a door opening, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2) (2019) 410-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.10.026
  4. J. Lee, Numerical analysis of how ventilation conditions impact compartment fire suppression by water mist, Ann. Nucl. Energy 136 (2020).
  5. J. Lee, J. Moon, Numerical analysis of the effect of horizontal distance between a water mist nozzle and ignition source on reduction in heat release rate, Ann. Nucl. Energy 144 (2020).
  6. C. Gong, L. Ding, H. Wan, J. Ji, Z. Gao, L. Yu, Spatial temperature distribution of rectangular n-heptane pool fires with different aspect ratios and heat fluxes received by adjacent horizontal targets, Fire Saf. J. 112 (2020).
  7. J.M. Souil, P. Joulain, E. Gengembre, Experimental and theoretical study of thermal radiation from turbulent diffusion flames to vertical target surfaces, Combust. Sci. Technol. 41 (1-2) (1984) 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208408923823
  8. F. Tang, H. Qing, W. Jennifer, Effects of crosswind and burner aspect ratio on flame characteristics and flame base drag length of diffusion flames, Combust. Flame 200 (2019) 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.11.011
  9. J. Ji, B. Li, H. Wan, L. Ding, Z. Gao, Gas temperature rise and flame length induced by two buoyancy-controlled propane burners aligned parallel to the cross wind, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 152 (2020).
  10. B. Li, H. Wan, Z. Gao, J. Ji, Experimental study on the characteristics of flame merging and tilt angle from twin propane burners under cross wind, Energy 174 (2019) 1200-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.061
  11. U.S. NRC, EPRI/NRC-RES Fire PRA Methodology for Nuclear Power Facilities Detailed Methodology (No. NUREG/CR-6850, EPRI 1011989 Final Report), vol. 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, USA, 2005.
  12. U.S. NRC, "Nuclear Power Plant Fire Modeling Analysis Guidelines", NUREG1934, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 2012.
  13. U.S. NRC, Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications - Final Report (No. NUREG-1824, Supplement 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., USA, 2016.
  14. U.S. NRC EPRI/NRC-RES, Methodology for Modeling Transient Fires in Nuclear Power Plant Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment (NUREG-2233, EPRI 3002018231), 2020.
  15. C.H. Lin, Y.M. Ferng, W.S. Hsu, B.S. Pei, Investigations on the characteristics of radiative heat transfer in liquid pool fires, Fire Technol. 46 (2) (2010) 321-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0071-7
  16. R. Fleury, Evaluation of Thermal Radiation Models for Fire Spread between Objects, Master Thesis, University of Canterbury, Australia, 2010.
  17. S.C. Kim, K.Y. Lee, A. Hamins, Energy balance in medium-scale methanol, ethanol, and acetone pool fires, Fire Saf. J. 107 (2019) 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.01.004
  18. J. Ji, G. Fanliang, Q. Tingting, Experimental and theoretical research on flame emissivity and radiative heat flux from heptane pool fires, in: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2020.
  19. M.E. Klassen, J.P. Gore, Structure and Radiation Properties of Pool Fires, NIST GCR 94-651, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1994.
  20. Korea Meteorological Administration Weather Data Service. https://data.kma.go.kr/climate/StatisticsDivision/selectStatisticsDivision.do?pgmNo=158. (Accessed 16 June 2021) accessed.
  21. J.A. Milke, Smoke Control by Mechanical Exhaust or Natural venting." SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Springer, New York, NY, 2016, pp. 1824-1862.
  22. J.H. Quintiere, Scaling applications in fire research, Fire Saf. J. 15 (1) (1989) 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(89)90045-3
  23. A.T. Modak, Thermal radiation from pool fires, Combust. Flame 29 (1977) 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(77)90106-7
  24. N. Iqbal, M.H. Salley, "Fire Dynamics Tools (FDTs): Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis Methods for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Fire Protection Inspection Program" Final Report, 2006.
  25. J. Lee, K.A. Sallam, Column thickness variation of 100-mm liquid in still air, Atomization Sprays 27 (1) (2017).
  26. Nobuyuki Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms, IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics 9 (1) (1979) 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
  27. K. McGrattan, S. Hostikka, R. McDermott, J. Floyd, C. Weinschenk, K. Overholt, Fire Dynamics Simulator User's Guide, NIST special publication1019.6, 2013.
  28. G. Heskestad, Fire plumes, flame height, and air entrainment, in: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Springer, New York, NY, 2016, pp. 396-428.
  29. R. McDermott, K. McGrattan, J. Floyd, A simple reaction time scale for under-resolved fire dynamics, Fire Saf. Sci. 10 (2011) 809-820. https://doi.org/10.3801/IAFFS.FSS.10-809
  30. H.S. Han, C.H. Hwang, C.B. Oh, D. Choi, S. Lee, Comparison of the flame height of pool fire according to combustion models in the FDS, Fire Sci. Eng. 32 (3) (2018) 42-50. https://doi.org/10.7731/KIFSE.2018.32.3.042
  31. G. Ha, W.G. Shin, J. Lee, Numerical analysis to determine fire suppression time for multiple water mist nozzles in a large fire test compartment, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (4) (2021) 1157-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.09.028
  32. S.H. Yun, C.H. Hwang, Changes in fire characteristics according to the distance between the fire source and sidewall in a reduced-scale compartment, Fire Sci. Eng. 33 (1) (2019) 50-59.
  33. D.S. Kinden, Experimental Study of the Effect of Froude-Number Scaling on Radiation, Master Thesis, Western Norway University of AppliedSciences, Norway, 2019.
  34. M.M. Barsim, M.A. Bassily, H.M. El-Batsh, Y.A. Rihan, M.M. Sherif, Froude scaling modeling in an Atrium Fire equipped with natural and transient forced ventilation, Int. J. Vent. 19 (3) (2020) 201-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733315.2019.1615220