DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the policy literacy of the Republic of Korea regarding nuclear and new-renewable energy

  • Im, Eunok (Department of Public Service, Kangnam University) ;
  • Kim, Ju Kyong (Department of Public Administration, Jeju National University) ;
  • Woo, Seung Min (Department of Nuclear and Energy Engineering, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2021.03.29
  • Accepted : 2021.08.13
  • Published : 2022.02.25

Abstract

Policy literacy plays a critical role in enhancing deliberative communication among the public, policymakers, and experts. It also helps develop a positive view of policy by the public, which facilitates public acceptance. Despite its importance, however, policy literacy has received little attention in energy policy practice. Therefore, this study explores factors affecting the public's understanding and knowledge (i.e., policy literacy) of nuclear and new-renewable energy policies. Accordingly, we analyzed data from an online survey of 790 laypeople in Korea. Specifically, we examined the effects of trust, transparency, and policy public relations (PR) on the policy literacy of the public regarding the two alternative energy sources. The analysis revealed that people showed higher policy literacy about the alternative sources when provided with more transparent information and exposed to more policy PR activities. However, we found that trust in energy plant operators played a negligible role in improving policy literacy for both energy sources. Based on these findings, we developed some policy suggestions to secure the energy policy literacy of the public.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Wang, Y. Li, J. Wu, J. Gu, S. Xu, Environmental beliefs and public acceptance of nuclear energy in China: a moderated mediation analysis, Energy Pol. 137 (2020) 111141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111141.
  2. J. McCurry, New South Korean president vows to end use of nuclear power, The Guardian, June 19 (2017). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/19/new-south-korean-president-vows-to-end-use-of-nuclear-power.
  3. L. Richardson, Protesting policy and practice in South Korea's nuclear energy industry, Asia-Pacific J 15 (2017) 133-154, https://doi.org/10.22459/lf.09.2017.05.
  4. The Government of Republic of Korea, 100 policy tasks five-year plan of the Moon Jae-in administration, Korean Culture and Information Service (2017) p13. https://www.korea.net/Resources/Publications/About-Korea/view?articleId=7959.
  5. Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea, The 8th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand 2017 (2017-2031) 35. No.2017-611, https://motie.go.kr/m/motie/ms/nt/announce3/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_seq_n=64603&bbs_cd_n=6.
  6. Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea, The 3rd Basic Plan for Energy (2019) 53. http://www.motie.go.kr/motie/ne/presse/press2/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_cd_n=81&bbs_seq_n=161753.
  7. K. Kang, et al., Nuclear power generation 2016, Ministry of trade industry and energy, Republic of Korea, and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) (2016) 629.
  8. Y. Yoon, 2020 new & renewable energy white paper, Ministry of trade industry and energy, Republic of Korea, and Korea Energy Agency (2020) 765-800. No.11-1410000-001321-11.
  9. C.A. Cassel, C.C. Lo, Theories of political literacy, Polit. Behav. 19 (1997) 317-335, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024895721905.
  10. H. Milner, Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work, University Press of New England, New Hampshire, 2002.
  11. Y.T. Choi, S.I. Park, Does E-government web site usage enhance policy literacy? Korean Soc. Public Adm 21 (2011) 73-98.
  12. J. Lo Bianco, Policy literacy, Lang. Educ. 15 (2001) 212-227, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780108666811.
  13. Y.-T. Lee, K.-A. Lee, E.-B. Oh, The influence of policy PR on policy literacy and policy support in tourism crisis management policy: a case of outbound travel safety policy, J. Tour. Leis. Res. 28 (2016) 63-82.
  14. Y.S. Yoon, J.W. Yoon, Factor analysis on climate change policy literacy, Soc. Sci. Study 44 (2018) 139-160.
  15. K. Jung, An empirical analysis of the policy literacy function: a focus on civic activities, Korean J. Public Adm 46 (2008) 73-104.
  16. D. Calabrese, K. Kalantari, F. Santucci, E. Stanghellini, Environmental policies and strategic communication in Iran: the value of public opinion research in decisionmaking, World Bank Publications, 2008. World Bank Working Paper No. 132.
  17. J.-S. Woo, Policy understanding through communication: the influence of media use and discussion, Korean J. Public Adm 47 (2009) 313-336.
  18. G. Wolbring, V. Leopatra, S. Yumakulov, Information flow and health policy literacy: the role of: the media, Information 3 (2012) 391-402, https://doi.org/10.3390/info3030391.
  19. R. Mu, Y. Li, Y. Fu, Can government communication facilitate policy understanding toward energy conservation? Evidence from an old industrial base in China, Sustain. Times 10 (2018) 3222-3237, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093222.
  20. M. Mendonca, S. Lacey, F. Hvelplund, Stability, participation and transparency in renewable energy policy: lessons from Denmark and the United States, Polic. Soc. 27 (2009) 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.01.007
  21. J. Naus, G. Spaargaren, van Vliet BJ, van der Horst HM, Smart grids, information flows and emerging domestic energy practices, Energy Pol. 68 (2014) 436-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.038
  22. D. Gambetta, Can we trust, in: Diego Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, 2000, pp. 213-237.
  23. J.F. Helliwell, R.D. Putnam, Economic growth and social capital in Italy, E. Econ. J. 21 (1995) 295-307.
  24. M.-J. Lee, J.-S. Jung, K.-S. Park, The influence of the perceived risk, perceived usefulness, and transparency in the development of nuclear power on public acceptability: using the Trust of Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power (KHNP) company as a mediator, Korean Corp. Manag. Rev. 21 (2014) 253-279.
  25. D.-W. Lee, J.-H. Son, G.-H. Kwon, The effects of trust in government on risk perception and the acceptance of policies for high-risk facilities in South Korea, Korean Assoc. Public Adm 51 (2018) 229-257.
  26. C. Ansell, A. Gash, Collaborative governance in theory and practice, J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor. 18 (2008) 543-571, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
  27. J. Soderman, The Citizen, the Administration and Community Law General Report for the XVIII Congress of FIDE, 1998. Stockholm, Sweden, June 3-6.
  28. E.H. Park, J.W. Lee, A study on policy literacy and public attitudes toward government innovation focusing on Government 3.0 in South Korea, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex 1 (2015) 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0027-3.
  29. J.B. Chung, H.K. Kim, Competition, economic benefits, trust, and risk perception in siting a potentially hazardous facility, Landsc. Urban Plann. 91 (2009) 8-16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.005.