DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Low-Dose Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography for Evaluating Intracranial Aneurysms: Analysis of Image Quality and Radiation Dose

  • Hee Jong Ki (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Bum-soo Kim (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jun-Ki Kim (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jai Ho Choi (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yong Sam Shin (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yangsean Choi (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Na-Young Shin (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jinhee Jang (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kook-jin Ahn (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2020.07.17
  • Accepted : 2021.09.30
  • Published : 2022.02.01

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and dose reduction of low-dose three-dimensional (3D) rotational angiography (RA) for evaluating intracranial aneurysms. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data and 3D RA datasets obtained from 146 prospectively registered patients (male:female, 46:100; median age, 58 years; range, 19-81 years). The subjective image quality of 79 examinations obtained from a conventional method and 67 examinations obtained from a low-dose (5-seconds and 0.10-μGy/frame) method was assessed by two neurointerventionists using a 3-point scale for four evaluation criteria. The total image quality score was then obtained as the average of the four scores. The image quality scores were compared between the two methods using a noninferiority statistical testing, with a margin of -0.2 (i.e., score of low-dose group - score of conventional group). For the evaluation of dose reduction, dose-area product (DAP) and air kerma (AK) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: The mean total image quality score ± standard deviation of the 3D RA was 2.97 ± 0.17 by reader 1 and 2.95 ± 0.20 by reader 2 for conventional group and 2.92 ± 0.30 and 2.95 ± 0.22, respectively, for low-dose group. The image quality of the 3D RA in the low-dose group was not inferior to that of the conventional group according to the total image quality score as well as individual scores for the four criteria in both readers. The mean DAP and AK per rotation were 5.87 Gy-cm2 and 0.56 Gy, respectively, in the conventional group, and 1.32 Gy-cm2 (p < 0.001) and 0.17 Gy (p < 0.001), respectively, in the low-dose group. Conclusion: Low-dose 3D RA was not inferior in image quality and reduced the radiation dose by 70%-77% compared to the conventional 3D RA in evaluating intracranial aneurysms.

Keywords

References

  1. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Vermandel M, Lubicz B, Despretz D, Lejeune JP, et al. 3D rotational angiography: use of propeller rotation for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:163-165 
  2. Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M. Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1199-1205 
  3. Abe T, Hirohata M, Tanaka N, Uchiyama Y, Kojima K, Fujimoto K, et al. Clinical benefits of rotational 3D angiography in endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:686-688 
  4. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, Hamatake S, Honda S, Takahashi M. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1545-1552 
  5. van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, de Gast AN, Peluso JP, Sluzewski M. 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:976-979  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0964
  6. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Trousset Y, Launay L, Kerrien E, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;218:799-808  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr09799
  7. Soderman M, Holmin S, Andersson T, Palmgren C, Babic' D, Hoornaert B. Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology 2016;278:962 
  8. Soderman M, Mauti M, Boon S, Omar A, Marteinsdottir M, Andersson T, et al. Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1365-1372  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1276-0
  9. Schneider T, Wyse E, Pearl MS. Analysis of radiation doses incurred during diagnostic cerebral angiography after the implementation of dose reduction strategies. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:384-388  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012204
  10. Honarmand AR, Shaibani A, Pashaee T, Syed FH, Hurley MC, Sammet CL, et al. Subjective and objective evaluation of image quality in biplane cerebral digital subtraction angiography following significant acquisition dose reduction in a clinical setting. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:297-301  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012296
  11. Pearl MS, Torok C, Katz Z, Messina SA, Blasco J, Tamargo RJ, et al. Diagnostic quality and accuracy of low dose 3D-DSA protocols in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:386-390  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011137
  12. Vano E, Fernandez JM, Sanchez RM, Martinez D, Ibor LL, Gil A, et al. Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:277-282  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3211
  13. Ihn YK, Kim BS, Byun JS, Suh SH, Won YD, Lee DH, et al. Patient radiation exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study. Neurointervention 2016;11:78-85  https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.78
  14. Choi J, Kim B, Choi Y, Shin NY, Jang J, Choi HS, et al. Image quality of low-dose cerebral angiography and effectiveness of clinical implementation on diagnostic and neurointerventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:827-833  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6029
  15. Ki HJ, Kim BS, Kim JK, Choi JH, Shin YS, Choi Y, et al. Low-dose 3D rotational angiography in measuring the size of intracranial aneurysm: in vitro feasibility study using aneurysm phantom. Neurointervention 2021;16:59-63  https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2020.00437
  16. Lee HJ, Yang PS, Lee SB, Yi JS, Ryu SY, Kim TW, et al. The influence of flush methods on transfemoral catheter cerebral angiography: continuous flush versus intermittent flush. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27:651-657  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.017
  17. Park IK, Park J, Kim TH, Lee J, Han K, Oh C, et al. Non-inferior low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography image quality with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction for overweight patients. PLoS One 2018;13:e0209243 
  18. Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:1113-1123  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.08.016
  19. Ahn S, Park SH, Lee KH. How to demonstrate similarity by using noninferiority and equivalence statistical testing in radiology research. Radiology 2013;267:328-338  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120725
  20. Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Patel AS, Moore J, Dolati-Ardejani P, Gupta R, et al. Reliability of dual- vs single-volume reconstruction of three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography for follow-up evaluation of endovascularly treated intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2016;22:687-692  https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916663469
  21. Chun CW, Kim BS, Lee CH, Ihn YK, Shin YS. Patient radiation dose in diagnostic and interventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms: experience at a single center. Korean J Radiol 2014;15:844-849  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.844
  22. D'Ercole L, Thyrion FZ, Bocchiola M, Mantovani L, Klersy C. Proposed local diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional neuroradiology and a preliminary analysis according to the complexity of the procedures. Phys Med 2012;28:61-70  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.10.008
  23. Kim DJ, Park MK, Jung DE, Kang JH, Kim BM. Radiation dose reduction without compromise to image quality by alterations of filtration and focal spot size in cerebral angiography. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:722-728  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.722
  24. Kahn EN, Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Thompson BG, Chen K, Christodoulou EG, et al. Radiation dose reduction during neurointerventional procedures by modification of default settings on biplane angiography equipment. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:819-823  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011891
  25. Maeng JY, Song Y, Sung YS, Kim TI, Lee DH, Kim TH. Feasibility of ultra-low radiation dose digital subtraction angiography: preliminary study in a simplified cerebral angiography phantom. Interv Neuroradiol 2019;25:589-595  https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019919850302
  26. Yi HJ, Sung JH, Lee DH, Kim SW, Lee SW. Analysis of radiation doses and dose reduction strategies during cerebral digital subtraction angiography. World Neurosurg 2017;100:216-223  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.004
  27. Chintalapani G, Chinnadurai P, Maier A, Xia Y, Bauer S, Shaltoni H, et al. The added value of volume-of-interest C-arm CT imaging during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:660-666  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4605
  28. Yang P, Ahmed A, Schafer S, Niemann D, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Royalty K, et al. Low-dose volume-of-interest C-arm CT imaging of intracranial stents and flow diverters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:648-654  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4590
  29. Lang S, Hoelter P, Schmidt M, Eisenhut F, Kaethner C, Kowarschik M, et al. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based 3D-angiography for visualization of cerebral vasculature. Clin Neuroradiol 2020;30:705-712 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00836-7