Journal of Korea Trade

한국무역학회 (Korea Trade Research Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Underdog Positioning on Consumer Preference in Korea: Focusing on Local Service Providers

  • Bang-Wool Han (Department of International Trade, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.27
  • 심사 : 2022.08.05
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose - Small independent brands from local companies often use underdog positioning to compete with established global brands. However, whether the effectiveness of underdog positioning of local businesses in the service sector remains insufficient. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the underdog effect on the preference of Korean consumers for individual service providers positioned as underdogs. Design/methodology - The author examines the research question of this study using a one-way ANOVA in three different positioning (underdog vs. top dog vs. control) between-subjects design, with a group of Korean participants. Findings - The experimental study shows that support for independent local (vs. global) service providers positioned as underdogs is straightforward. Using the lens of consumer identification with underdog biographies, this study found that consumers prefer small local service providers with passion and determination regardless of their disadvantages. Originality/value - To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effectiveness of underdog positioning in the context of individual service providers. As it competes with global service companies for domestic consumer preference in Korea, the findings have great implications for ensuring the sustainability of small local service providers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atkinson, R.D. (2021), Korea Has Too Many Small Firms and It's Hurting Economic Growth. The Korea Times, Retrieved from https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/opinion/2021/05/784_308349.html.
  2. Goldschmied, N., C. McDaniel and V. Ramirez (2017), "Preference for the Underdog When Sampling Commercial Products: Assessment of the Effect and Limiting Conditions", Journal of Marketing Behavior, 3(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1561/107.00000041
  3. Han, B. and M. Kim (2020), "Interaction of the Underdog with Equality and Scarcity", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(2), 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-10-2018-0453
  4. He, Y., Y. You and Q. Chen (2020), "Our Conditional love for the Underdog: The Effect of Brand Positioning and the Lay Theory of Achievement on WOM", Journal of Business Research, 118, 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.007
  5. Jang, L. (2021), Populartiy of Home Workwouts Soars during Pandemic. The Korea Bizwire, Retrieved from http://koreabizwire.com/popularity-of-home-workouts-soars-during-pandemic/184577.
  6. Jin, L. and Y. Huang (2019), "How Power States Influence the Persuasiveness of Top-Dog versus Underdog Appeals", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(2), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1069
  7. Jun, S., J. Sung, J. W. Gentry and L. P. McGinnis (2015), "Effects of Underdog (vs. top dog) Positioning Advertising", International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 495-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996199
  8. Kao, D. T. (2015), "Is Cinderella Resurging? The Impact of Consumers' Underdog Disposition on Brand Preferences: Underdog Brand Biography and Brand Status as Moderators", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(5), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1521
  9. Kao, D. T. (2019), "The Impact of Envy on Brand Preference: Brand Storytelling and Psychological Distance as Moderators", Journal of Product Brand Management, 28(4), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-2004
  10. Keller, K.L. and D. R. Lehmann (2006), "Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities", Marketing Science, 25(6), 740-759. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0153
  11. Kim, J., S. T. Allison, D. Eylon, G. R. Goethals, M. J. Markus, S. M. Hindle and H. A. McGuire (2008), "Rooting for (and Then Abandoning) the Underdog", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2550-2573.
  12. Kim, Y., K. Park and S. Stacey Lee (2019), "The Underdog Trap: The Moderating Role of Transgression Type in Forgiving Underdog Brands", Psychology & Marketing, 36(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21155
  13. Kirmani, A., R. W. Hamilton, D. V. Thompson and S. Lantzy (2017), "Doing Well Versus Doing Good: The Differential Effect of Underdog Positioning on Moral and Competent Service Providers", Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0369
  14. Li, Y. and M. Zhao (2018), "Must the Underdog Win? The Moderation Effect of Product Type in the Underdog Effect of Brand Stories", Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12326
  15. McGinnis, L. P. and J. W. Gentry (2009), "Underdog Consumption: An Exploration into Meanings and Motives", Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.026
  16. Nagar, K. (2019), "Support for the Underdog Brand Biography: Effects on Consumer Attitude and Behavior", Journal of Marketing Communications, 1-17.
  17. Nagar, K. (2021), "Using Top Dog Versus Underdog Brand Biography in Advertising: Effects of Similarity and Consumption Decision of Non-deceptive Counterfeits", Journal of Marketing Communications, 27(4), 415-435.
  18. Paharia, N., J. Avery and A. Keinan (2014), "Positioning Brands Against Large Competitors to Increase Sales", Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0438
  19. Paharia, N., A. Keinan, J. Avery and J. B. Schor (2011), "The Underdog Effect: The Marketing of Disadvantage and Determination Through Brand Biography", Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1086/656219
  20. Shin Legendre, T., R. Warnick and M. Baker (2017), The Support of Local Underdogs: System Justification Theory Perspectives. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 1938965517748773.
  21. Shirai, M. (2017), "Underdog Effects: The Role of Consumption Domain and Retail Crowding", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(5), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-07-2016-1872
  22. Simon, H. A. (1954), "Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions", Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1086/266513
  23. Tang, Y. E. and A. S. Tsang (2020), "Inspire Me to Purchase: Consumers' Personal Control and Preference for Underdog Brand Positioning", Journal of Business Research, 115, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.031