References
- 김용일.황지현, "COVID-19가 국제중재에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구",「융합정보논문지」, 제11권 제12호, 중소기업융합학회, 2021.
- 안건형, "2019년 개정 ICC 중재 진행에 관한 당사자 및 중재판정부 지침의 주요 내용과 시사점",「중재연구」, 제29권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2019.
- 이춘원, "UNCITRAL 신속중재의 도입과 전망",「중재연구」, 제32권 제1호, 한국중재학회, 2022.
- Alex, L., Virtual Hearings and Alternative Arbitral Procedures in the C0VID-19 Era, 13(1) Contemp. Asia ARB. J . 85, 2020.
- CIETAC(2020), CIETAC Launches Guidelines on Proceeding with Arbitration Actively and Properly During the COVID-19 Pandemic(Trail).
- Docket File no. 18 ONc 3/20, published on 28 September 2020, the Austrian Supreme Court.
- Drahozal, C. R., Diversity and Uniformity in International Arbitration Law, 31 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 393, 2017.
- Fellas, J., International Arbitration in the Midst of COVID-19: One Year Later, New York Law Journal. URL: https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/03/19/internationalarbitration-in-the-midst-of-covid-19-one-year-later/?slreturn=20220309012433.
- Fortese, F. and Hemmi, L., Procedural Fairness and Efficiency in International Arbitration, Groningen Journal of International Law, volume 3, Issue 1, 2015.
- Greenwood, L., The Canary Is Dead: Arbitration and Climate Change, Journal of International Arbitration, 38, 2021.
- HKIAC(2020). Services and Success Stories, HKIAC. URL: https://www.hkiac.org/news/virtualhearings-hkiac-services-and-successstories.
- ICC(2020), ICC Guidance Note on Possible Measures Aimed at Mitigating the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic, 22.
- ICSID, A Brief Guide to Online Hearings at ICSID(24 March 2020), A Brief Guide to Online Hearings at ICSID, ICSID(worldbank.org).
- International Arbitration Survey(2021), Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World. URL: https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2021-international-arbitration-survey.
- Kapferer, S., Austrian Supreme Court confirms arbitral tribunal's ruling to hold virtual hearing despite one party's objection, December 4, 2020. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, The 2021 ICC Arbitration Rules: Changes to the Arbitral Tribunal's Powers. URL: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration.
- Koulu, R., Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative to Enforcement, volume 13, Issue 1, 2016.
- Kun, F., The Impact of COVID-19 on the Administration of justice, Kluwer Arbitration Blog(10 July 2020). URL: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/07/10/theimpact-of-covid-19-on-the-administration-of-justice.
- LCIA(2020), LCIA Services Update: COVID-19.
- Roe, B., The Year Ahead - Innovation: A new generation of legal analysis tools is emerging, GAR(21 January 2019).
- SCC(2020), SCC Platform Made Available to Ad Hoc Arbitrations Globally.
- Seoul IDRC(2020), Virtual Hearing Services-Recent. URL: http://www.sidrc.org/idrc/en/bbs/board_view.do?bo_table=news_en&wr_id=863.
- Shope, M. L., THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL INSTITUTION RESPONSE TO COVID-19 AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020.
- SIAC(2020), Arbitration at SIAC during COVID-19.
- Soares, F. U., New Technologies and Arbitration, 7 Indian J. Arb. L., Volume VII, Issue 1, 2018.
- Stephan, W., THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION-HICCUP OR TURNING POINT?, 13(1) Contemp. Asia Arb. J. 7, 2020.
- Vannieuwenhuyse, G., Arbitration and New Technologies: Mutual Benefits, Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 35, Issue 1, 2018.
- Walker, J., Virtual Hearings-the New Normal, GAR, 2020. URL: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1222421/virtual-hearings-%E2%80%93-the-new-normal.
- Wilske, S., THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION-HICCUP OR TURNING POINT?, 13(1) Contemp. Asia Arb. J. 7, 2020.