DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Regional Development Attractiveness Measurement Considering the Comprehensive Air Quality Index

통합대기환경지수를 고려한 지역개발 매력도 측정

  • Lee, Byung-Hark (Dept. of Rural Systems Engineering, Kongju University) ;
  • Jung, Nam-Su (Dept. Rural Systems Engineering, Kongju University)
  • 이병학 (공주대학교 농공학과) ;
  • 정남수 (공주대학교 지역건설공학과)
  • Received : 2022.08.19
  • Accepted : 2022.11.24
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

Recently, the relevance of the Air Quality Index considering major factors related to the air environment and the local economy and community was analyzed in abraod. In Korea, a comprehensive air-quality index has been proposed. In this study, the comprehensive air-quality index and the index that can integrate Gross Domestic Product per capita were summarized as regional attractiveness. As a result of the analysis, Ulsan, Chungnam, Seoul, Chungbuk, and Jeonnam had the highest Gross domestic product per capita, and Jeju, Gyeongnam, and Gyeongbuk had the best Comprehensive air-quality index, and Ulsan had the highest attractiveness. As a result of the correlation analysis, it was found that there was no correlation between the two variables, Gross domestic product per capita and Comprehensive air-quality index, because various factors such as topographical characteristics, hazardous substances, and local government's efforts were not taken into account. As a result of sensitivity analysis, Ulsan had the highest sensitivity and variance for Gross domestic product per capita and Comprehensive air-quality index. As for the relative ratio of attractiveness between regions, Ulsan's attractiveness was 2.95 times that of Daegu's, indicating a large difference between regions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2022년 공주대학교 학술연구지원사업의 연구지원에 의하여 연구되었음

References

  1. Ahn. J. S., 2011. A Study on Sustainability of Urban Regeneration. The Association of Korean Photo-Geographers 21(3): 125-137. (in Korean).
  2. HO. M. G., D. C. Sin., Y. U. Lim., J. Y. Yang., Y. J. Lee., Y. S. Goo., J. S. Han., Y. D. Hong., 2006. Development Air Environmental Index(AEI) Considered Health Effect. Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 22(1): 461-462 (in Korean).
  3. Hwang. H. Y., 2019. The Direction of the New Deal for Urban Regeneration. Korea Planning Association 16(4): 2-3. (in Korean).
  4. Jung, D. C. 2017. The achievements and future challenges of the general agricultural and fishing village development project. The Korean Regional Development Association, 35-51(in korean).
  5. Kang. D. B., C. H. Park., W. S. Jung., K. O. Lee. and H. W. Lee., 2020. Effects of Meteorology and Air Pollution on Respiratory Disease affecting Vulnerable Populations. The Korean Environmental Sciences Society. 29(7): 715-727. doi:10.5322/JESI.2020.29.7.715 (in Korean).
  6. Kim. U. G., Y. S. Moon., Y. J. Kim., and S. H. Lee., The Usefulness and Application of Air Quality Index Metropolitan Korea. Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 4(1): 136-137 (in Korean).
  7. Oh. Y. J., 2020. The actual conditions and improvement tasks of vulnerable areas in rural areas due to reckless development. The 26th Rural Community Policy Forum, Seoul aT Center Grand Hall, 3-12 (in Korean).
  8. Park, S. H., 2021. Regional Impact Analysis of Basic Life SOC Construction in Rural Village Development Project. Master's Degree. diss., Chungbuk University, 1-14 (in Korean).
  9. Sim, J. H., 2017. The meaning of the times and development tasks of general agricultural and fishing village development projects. Korean Reginal Develoment Assoclation Seminar, 1-16. (in korean).
  10. Son. J. S., H. J. Sin., S. A. No., J. H. Park., Y. D. Hong., J. S. Han., 2007. An Analysis of Comprehensive Air-Quality Index for Metropolitan Area in 2007. Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 23(2): 371-372 (in Korean).
  11. Trifkovi'c. M., Miroslav. K., Zarko. N., Goca. J., and Milan. K., 2021. The Attractiveness of Urban Complexes: Economic Aspect and Risks of Environmental Pollution. MDPI13(14): 1-13. doi:10.3390/su13148098
  12. Yang, W. S., and N. S. Jung, 2016. Present Implications of Saemaul Project for Rural Development Policy. Korea Rural Community Corporation 22(2): 9-18. doi:10.7851/KSRP.2016.22.2.009 (in korean).