한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학술정보자원의 사회적 공유에 관한 연구 - 일반인의 정보요구와 행위를 중심으로 -

A Study on Social Sharing of Scholarly Information Resources: Focusing on Laypeople's Information Needs and Behaviors

  • 김초해 (연세대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 박지홍 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.18
  • 심사 : 2022.05.20
  • 발행 : 2022.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

오늘날 전문적 지식에 대한 시민 요구의 증가, 학계의 시민참여 연구 확대, 전문적 지식에 대한 정보서비스의 제공에도 불구하고, 여전히 비전문적 일반인이 학술정보자원에 접근하는 데에 어려움이 있는 것으로 파악된다. 본 연구는 이에 주목하여 학술정보자원에 대한 일반인의 정보요구와 정보행위를 설문조사를 통해 조사하였다. 학술정보자원의 탐색 및 이용행태, 학술정보자원 활용에 대한 지원 필요성에 관한 인식이 조사되었으며, 이를 통해 학술정보자원이 학술 커뮤니티를 넘어 사회적으로 공유되는 정도와 양상을 분석하였다. 본 연구는 전통적인 학술 커뮤니케이션에서의 이용자 범위를 확대하여, 이들을 위한 학술정보자원에의 접근과 이용 확대 지원의 필요성을 강조한 초기 연구라는 점에서 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

Today, despite the increase in professional knowledge-related information needs of citizens, the expansion of citizen participatory research in academia, and the provision of information services for the professional knowledge, there are still difficulties in access to scholarly information resources by laypeople. Focusing on this problem, this study investigates laypeople's scholarly information needs and behaviors through a questionnaire survey. By examining the search and use behaviors of scholarly information resources, and the perception of the need to support the utilization of them, this study analyzes the degree and pattern of social sharing of scholarly information resources beyond the scholarly community. This study is significant in that it expands the range of users in traditional scholarly communication and emphasizes the need to support them to access and use scholarly information resources.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2019S1A5C2A03083499).

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT. National Information Society agency (2020). The Report on the Digital Divide (NIA VIII-RSE-C-20074).
  2. K-indicator (2021.11.14). http://www.index.go.kr/unify
  3. National Library of Korea (2021.10.25). www.nl.go.kr/
  4. National Assembly Library (2021.10.25). https://www.nanet.go.kr/main.do
  5. Kim, Dong-Kwang (2002). Changing relation of science and public: the approaches to public understanding of science(PUS). Journal of Science & Tehnology Studies, 2(2), 1-23.
  6. Kim, SangMook, Lee, ChangWon, & Han, Seunghwan (2004). Policy process of the central government and citizen participation. Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 16(4), 861-885.
  7. Kim, Seonghee & Park, Hyejin (2014). A study on the quality of academic information service of internet portal. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.079
  8. Kim, Young-Ki (2007). A study on the influence of factors that makes web sites credible. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(4), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.4.093
  9. Kim, Young-Ki (2011). Comparative study on criteria for evaluation of internet information. The Journal of Humanities, 27, 87-109.
  10. Kim, Jeong-Hwan, Kim, Jae-Hoon, & Hwang, Jae-Young (2011). A study on information users' needs and information seeking behavior of doctoral researchers in digital age. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(3), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.3.189
  11. Noh, Younghee & Oh, Sanghee (2011). An analysis of users' perception of providing CHI services in public libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 45-77. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.42.3.201109.45
  12. Moon, Sin-Yong (2009). E-Governance and online citizen participation in policy process: focusing on the cases of metropolitan governments. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 12(2), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.22896/KARIS.2009.12.2.003
  13. Bak, Hee-Je (2002). Two approaches to public understanding of science: how survey analyses and constructivist PUS might benefit each other. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2(2), 25-54.
  14. Bae, Kyung-Jae (2010). The analysis of the differences of information needs and usages among academic users in the field of science and technology. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 44(2), 157-176.
  15. Sa, Jay-Myung (2006). A study on activation of citizen participation in the policy process. Korean Public Administration and Policy Studies, 4(1), 69-99.
  16. Yoo, Jae-Won (2003). Establishing citizen participation: from a perspective of participatory democracy. Korean Policy Sciences Review, 7(2), 105-125.
  17. Yun, Seongyi (2006). Institutionalization of e-participation in the policy making process. Korean Journal of Social Theory, 30, 187-211.
  18. Lee, Yong-Jae (2012). A study on marketing strategies of public libraries: focused on New York public libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4), 113-137. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.113
  19. Lee, Jeong-Gu, Lee, Myung-Sun, Yang, Hee-Jin, Kim, Chang-Mok, & Kim, Tae-Jung (2006). A study on the information needs and using behavior of science-technology information users of the KISTI. Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference, 4(2), 95-99.
  20. Lee, Jiyoung Lee, Kim, Giyeong, & Park, Young-Sook (2016). A study on the categorization of citizens' information needs. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(2), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.2.245
  21. Joung, Kyoung-Hee (2010). A study on the open access policy to public funded research articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.207
  22. Korean Standard Classification of Occupations (2018). http://kssc.kostat.go.kr/
  23. Han, Seung Hee & Lee, Jee Yeon (2006). Searching behavior of scientists and technologists based on their information needs. Proceedings of the 13th Korean Society for Information Management Conference, 17-22.
  24. Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287
  25. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009. 7. 1). Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Informal Science. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf
  26. Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
  27. Crawford, D. (1986). Meeting scholarly information needs in an automated environment: a humanist's perspective. College & Research Libraries, 47(6), 569-574. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_47_06_569
  28. Durant, J. (1993). What Is Scientific Literacy?. In J. Durant and J. Gregory eds. Science and Culture in Europe. London: Science Museum, 129-138.
  29. Finke, P. (Ed.). (2015). Freie Burger, freie Forschung: Die Wissenschaft verlasst den Elfenbeinturm. Munich: oekom. 재인용: Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2017). Citizen science in the social sciences: a call for more evidence. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 22-26.
  30. Fortson, L., Masters, K., Nichol, R., Edmondson, E. M., Lintott, C., Raddick, J., & Wallin, J. (2012). Galaxy zoo: morphological classifiaction and citizen science. Advances in Machine Learning and Data Mining for Astronomy, 2012, 213-236.
  31. George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E. C., St Clair, G., & Stein, J. (2006). Scholarly use of information: graduate students' information seeking behaviour. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 11(4), paper 272. Available: http://InformationR.net/ir/11-4/paper272.html
  32. Heiss, R. & Matthes, J. (2017). Citizen science in the social sciences: a call for more evidence. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.7
  33. Lawal, I. (2002). Scholarly communication: the use and non-use of e-print archives for the dissemination of scientific information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2002(Fall).
  34. Mbabu, L. G., Bertram, A., & Varnum, K. (2013). Patterns of undergraduates' use of scholarly databases in a large research university. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.10.004
  35. OECD, 2004. Declaration on Access to Research Data From Public Funding.
  36. RISS (2021.10.23). https://riss.kr/
  37. Rosenblatt, S. (2010). They can find it but they don't know what to do with it: Describing the use of scholarly literature by undergraduate students. Journal of Information Literacy, 4(2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.11645/4.2.1486
  38. ScienceON (2021.10.23). https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/
  39. Sondergaard, T. F., Andersen, J., & Hjorland, B. (2003). Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information revising and updating the UNISIST model. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 278-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310472509
  40. Thomas, G. P. & Durant, J. R. (1987). "Why Should We Promote the Public Understanding of Science?," in M. Shortland (ed.) Scientific Literacy Papers, pp. 1-14. Oxford: Rewley House.
  41. UNISIST. (1971). Study Report on the Feasibility of a World Science Information System. by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the International Council of Scientitic Unions. Paris: UNESCO.
  42. Wang, M. L. (2010). Scholarly journal use and reading behavior of social scientists in Taiwan. The International Information & Library Review, 42(4), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2010.10.001
  43. Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., & Stilgoe, J. (2005). The Public Value Of Science. London: Demos.