DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Attribute Value of Instant Rice Using Hedonic Price Model

헤도닉 가격 모형을 이용한 즉석밥 속성가치에 대한 연구

  • 권순성 (강원대학교 농업자원경제학과) ;
  • 전혜빈 (강원대학교 농업자원경제학과) ;
  • 김정환 (한국농촌경제연구원) ;
  • 이지용 (강원대학교 농업자원경제학과)
  • Received : 2021.10.29
  • Accepted : 2022.04.14
  • Published : 2022.05.31

Abstract

Rice has prevailed as a staple food in South Korea. Rice consumption has sharply shrunk nowadays. In the wake of COVID-19 Shock and the "untact" era, the instant rice market has significantly grown, and there is a possibility of solving the shrinking consumption of domestic rice. This study contributes to the development of rice consumption promotion strategies by examining the factors of purchasing instant rice based on the Hedonic Price Methodology. In particular, given the increase in online market, this study compares attribute values of product characteristics between online and offline markets. The empirical results show that calorie, brand, organic and functional products have positive effects on instant rice prices. The rate of carbohydrate, the PB and bundle attributes have negative effects on instant rice prices. The results also show that the magnitude of brand, bundle and PB attribute values are bigger in offline market while that of the number of multigrain attribute value is relatively bigger in online market. The organic attribute value is important regardless of marketing channels.

Keywords

References

  1. An, M. R., S. I. Yoon, and I. B. Ji. 2018. Analysis of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Cheese Characteristics Using Hedonic Price Model. Journal of Rural Development. 41(3): 51-71. https://doi.org/10.36464/JRD.2018.41.3.003
  2. Chae, J. H., S. S. Kim, and M. S. Lee. 2007. The Consumers' Perception of Rice Quality and Characteristics of Its Distribution Channel. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development. 14(1): 197-230.
  3. Choi, Y. H., S. G. Kwon, and I. B. Ji. 2020. An Analysis of Consumer Preference for Rice Attributes and Forecast of Market Share. Korea Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy. 47(3): 448-470. https://doi.org/10.30805/kjamp.2020.47.3.448
  4. Food Information Statistics System (FIS). Retail store sales by item. https://www.atfis.or.kr (access 2021. 8. 20).
  5. Kim, S. H. and S. W. Baek. 2020. A Study on the Consumer Preferences and Choice Attributes of Purchasing Organic Instant Rice. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 28(2): 189-208. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2020.28.2.189
  6. Kim, J. I. and H. W. Park. 2021. Trend and Prospect of Rice Supply and Demand. Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  7. Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation (aT). 2021. A Report on 2020 rice processed food market segmentation.
  8. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 2021. 2020 Food Consumption Behavior Survey.
  9. KOSTAT. 2021. The Report of the results of 2020 Grain Consumption Survey.
  10. Lancaster, K. J. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of political economy. 74(2): 132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
  11. Park, D. K., M. H. Kim, K. I. Lee, T. G. Kim, H. Y. Kim, M. J. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. S. Kim, and D. H. Kim. 2006. System Development for Raising Competitiveness in the Rice Marketing. Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  12. Park, S. H. and W. B. Kim. 2009. Measurement of Brand Equity for Agricultural Products: Cases of Rice, Beef and Peach in Korea. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics. 50(4): 1-30.
  13. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of political economy. 82(1): 34-55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169
  14. Seo, W. S. 2019. Comparing the Housing Implicit Prices of Restricted and Unrestricted Hedonic Price Models. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 54(6): 80-88. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2019.11.54.6.80
  15. Torres-Reyna, O. 2007. Linear regression using Stata. Data and statistical services, Princeton University.
  16. Yu, J. C. and K. S. Gong. 2010. Revealed Preference Analysis for Organic Rice: Hedonic Price Analysis. Journal of Agricultural science. 26(1): 49-53.