DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of the Non-linear Relationships between Watershed Land Use and Biological Indicators of Streams - The Han River Basin -

유역 토지이용과 하천 생물지수의 비선형적 관계 연구 - 한강권역을 대상으로 -

  • Park, Se-Rin (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Won (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University) ;
  • Park, Yu-Jin (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Woo (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University)
  • 박세린 (건국대학교 산림조경학과) ;
  • 이종원 (건국대학교 산림조경학과 대학원) ;
  • 박유진 (건국대학교 산림조경학과 대학원) ;
  • 이상우 (건국대학교 산림조경학과)
  • Received : 2022.04.15
  • Accepted : 2022.04.26
  • Published : 2022.04.29

Abstract

Land use is a critical factor that affects the hydrological characteristics of watersheds, thereby determining the biological condition of streams. This study analyzes the effects of land uses in the watersheds on biological indicators of streams across the Han River basin using a linear model (LM) and generalized additive model (GAM). LULC and biological monitoring data of streams were obtained from the Korean Ministry of Environment. The proportions of urban, agricultural, and forest areas in the watersheds were regressed to the three biological indicators, including diatom, benthic macroinvertebrate, and fish of streams. The estimated LM and GAM models for the biological indicators were then compared, using regression determination R2 and AIC values. The results revealed that GAM models performed better than the LM models in explaining the variances of biological indicators of streams, indicating the non-linear relationships between biological indicators and land uses in watersheds. Also, the results suggested that the indicator of macroinvertebrates was the most sensitive indicator to land uses in watersheds. Although non-linear relationships between watershed land uses and biological indicators of streams could vary among biological indicators, it was consistent that streams' biological integrity significantly deteriorated by a relatively low percentage of urban areas. Meanwhile, biological indicators of streams were negatively affected by the relatively high percentage of agricultural areas. The results of this study can be integrated into effective quantitative criteria for the watershed management and land use plans to enhance the biological integrity of streams. In specific, land uses management plans in watersheds may need more close attention to urban land use changes than agricultural land uses to sustain the biological integrity of streams.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년도 건국대학교 우수연구인력 양성사업 지원과 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 ICT 기반 환경영향평가 의사결정 지원 기술개발사업(No. 2020002990009)으로 연구되었으며 환경부와 국립환경과학원의 「하천 수생태계 현황 조사 및 건강성 평가」 자료를 활용했습니다.

References

  1. Allan, J.D., D.L. Erickson and J. Fay. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37(1): 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.d01-546.x
  2. Brauman, K.A., G.C. Daily, T.K. Duarte and H.A. Mooney. 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 67-98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758
  3. Carey, R.O., K.W. Migliaccio, Y. Li, B. Schaffer, G.A. Kiker and M.T. Brown. 2011. Land use disturbance indicators and water quality variability in the Biscayne Bay Watershed, Florida. Ecological Indicators 11(5): 1093-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.12.009
  4. Cho, I.H., Y.W. Lee, H.K. Kim, Y.J. Kim, S.J. Hwang, D.H. Won, S.Y. Noh, J.K. Lee and B.H. Kim. 2019. A multimetric diatom index for biological integrity assessment of Korean streams. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 37(2): 204-216. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.2.204
  5. Choi, M.S. and S.I. Byeon. 2016. Comparison on Forecasting Performance of Housing Price Prediction Models in Seoul. The Seoul Studies 17(3): 75-89. https://doi.org/10.23129/SEOULS.17.3.201609.75
  6. Dodds, W.K., W.H. Clements, K. Gido, R.H. Hilderbrand and R.S. King. 2010. Thresholds, breakpoints, and nonlinearity in freshwaters as related to management. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29(3): 988-997. https://doi.org/10.1899/09-148.1
  7. Dunn, S.M., I. Brown, J. Sample and H. Post. 2012. Relationships between climate, water resources, land use and diffuse pollution and the significance of uncertainty in climate change. Journal of Hydrology 434: 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.039
  8. Fierro, P., C. Valdovinos, I. Arismendi, G. Diaz, A. Jara-Flores, E. Habit, and L. Vargas-Chacoff. 2019. Examining the influence of human stressors on benthic algae, macro-invertebrate, and fish assemblages in Mediterranean streams of Chile. Science of the total environment 686: 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.277
  9. Flinders, C.A., R.J. Horwitz and T. Belton. 2008. Relationship of fish and macroinvertebrate communities in the mid-Atlantic uplands: implications for integrated assessments. Ecological Indicators 8(5): 588-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.08.004
  10. Giri, S., Z. Zhang, D. Krasnuk and R.G. Lathrop. 2019. Evaluating the impact of land uses on stream integrity using machine learning algorithms. Science of The Total Environment 696: 133858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133858
  11. Groffman, P.M., Baron, J.S., Blett, T., Gold, A.J., Goodman, I., Gunderson, L.H., Levinson, B.M., Palmer, M.A., Paerl, H.W., Peterson, G.D. and Poff, N.L., 2006. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application?. Ecosystems, 9(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0142-z
  12. Gu, H., J. Wang, L. Ma, Z. Shang and Q. Zhang. 2019. Insights into the BRT (Boosted Regression Trees) method in the study of the climate-growth relationship of Masson Pine in Subtropical China. Forests 10(3): 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10030228
  13. Hastie, T. and R. Tibshirani. 1990. Exploring the nature of covariate effects in the proportional hazards model. Biometrics 1005-1016.
  14. Hjort, Jan, Juuso Suomi, and Jukka Kayhko. 2016. Extreme urban-rural temperatures in the coastal city of Turku, Finland: Quantification and visualization based on a generalized additive model. Science of the Total Environment. 569: 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.136
  15. Hwang, S.A., S.J. Hwang, S.R. Park and S.W. Lee. 2016. Examining the relationships between watershed urban land use and stream water quality using linear and generalized additive models. Water 8(4): 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040155
  16. Karr, J.R. 1991. Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecological Applications 1(1): 66-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941848
  17. Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6): 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  18. Kelly, M.G. and B.A. Whitton. 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7(4): 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003802
  19. Kerans, B.L. and J.R. Karr. 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecological Applications 4(4): 768-785. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942007
  20. Kim, J.H., J.D. Yoon, H. Jo, K.H. Chang, and M.H. Jang. 2012. Stream health assessment on Hoeya river basin and other streams based on fish community and land use in the surrounding watersheds. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 45(4): 392-402. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2012.45.4.392
  21. Kim, S.Y. 2020. Analysis of the factors influencing PM2.5 concentration. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society 22(4): 1335-1347. https://doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2020.22.4.1335
  22. Lee, J.W., S.W. Lee, K.J. An, S.J. Hwang and N.Y. Kim. 2020. An Estimated Structural Equation Model to Assess the Effects of Land Use on Water Quality and Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Streams of the NamHan River System, South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(6): 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062116
  23. Liu, J., Z. Shen, and L. Chen. 2018. Assessing how spatial variations of land use pattern affect water quality across a typical urbanized watershed in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 176: 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.006
  24. Luo, K., X. Hu, Q. He, Z. Wu, H. Cheng, Z. Hu, and A. Mazumder. 2018. Impacts of rapid urbanization on the water quality and macroinvertebrate communities of streams: A case study in Liangjiang New Area, China. Science of the Total Environment 621: 1601-1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.068
  25. Min, H.N., N.Y. Kim, M.K. Kim, S.W. Lee, K.S. Hwang, and S.J. Hwang. 2012. Relation of Stream Shape Complexity to Land Use, Water Quality and Benthic Diatoms in the Seom River Watershed. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 45(1): 110-122.
  26. MOE/NIER. 2019. Stream/River Ecosystem Survey and Health Assessment (XI). Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environment Research, Incheon, Korea.
  27. MOE. 2015. National Water Environment Management Plan for Han River Basin; Korean Literature; Ministry of Environment/Han River Basin Environmental Office, Gyeonggi-do.
  28. Morton, R. and B.L. Henderson. 2008. Estimation of nonlinear trends in water quality: an improved approach using generalized additive models. Water Resources Research 44(7).
  29. Nessimian, J.L., E.M. Venticinque, J. Zuanon, J, P. de Marco, M. Gordo, L. Fidelis, J.D. Batista and L. Juen. 2008. Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia 614(1): 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9441-x
  30. Park, S.R., K.M. Choi, and S.W. Lee. 2019. Spatial variation in land use and topographic effects on water quality at the Geum River watershed. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 52(2): 94-104. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2019.52.2.094
  31. Park, S.R., S. Kim and S.W. Lee. 2021. Evaluating the Relationships between Riparian Land Cover Characteristics and Biological Integrity of Streams Using Random Forest Algorithms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(6): 3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063182
  32. Park, Y., S. Lee, and J. Lee. 2020. Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and AHP in Multicriteria Inventory Classification While Planning Green Infrastructure for Resilient Stream Ecosystems. Sustainability 12(21): 9035. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219035
  33. Petty, J.T., J.B. Fulton, M.P. Strager, G.T. Merovich, J.M. Stiles, and P.F. Ziemkiewicz. 2010. Landscape indicators and thresholds of stream ecological impairment in an intensively mined Appalachian watershed. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29(4): 1292-1309. https://doi.org/10.1899/09-149.1
  34. Pillsbury, R., R.J. Stevenson, M.D. Munn, and I. Waite. 2019. Relationships between diatom metrics based on species nutrient traits and agricultural land use. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191(4): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7122-4
  35. Sponseller, R.A., E.F. Benfield and H.M. Valett. 2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 46(10): 1409-1424. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00758.x
  36. Teittinen, A., M. Taka, O. Ruth and J. Soininen. 2015. Variation in stream diatom communities in relation to water quality and catchment variables in a boreal, urbanized region. Science of the Total Environment 530: 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.101
  37. Utz, R.M., R.H. Hilderbrand and D.M. Boward. 2009. Identifying regional differences in threshold responses of aquatic invertebrates to land cover gradients. Ecological Indicators 9(3): 556-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.08.008
  38. Waite, I.R., M.D. Munn, P.W. Moran, C.P. Konrad, L.H. Nowell, M.R. Meador, P.C. van Metre, and D.M. Carlisle. 2019. Effects of urban multi-stressors on three stream biotic assemblages. Science of the Total Environment 660: 1472-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.240
  39. Walters, D.M., A.H. Roy, and D.S. Leigh. 2009. Environmental indicators of macroinvertebrate and fish assemblage integrity in urbanizing watersheds. Ecological Indicators 9(6): 1222-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.011
  40. Won, D.H., Y.C. Jun, S.J. Kwon, S.J. Hwang, K.G. Ahn and J.K. Lee. 2006. Development of Konan Saprobic Index using Benthic Macro-invertebrates and Its Application to Biological Stream Environment Assessment. Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality 22(5): 768-783.
  41. Wood, S.N., 2017. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC press.