Korean Journal of Childcare and Education (한국보육지원학회지)

Korean Association of ChildCare & Educatioin (한국보육지원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Mediating Effect of Teacher Self-Efficacy for Positive Teacher-Child Relationships on the Relationship between Perceived Supervisor's Servant Leadership and Work Engagement

지각된 원장의 서번트 리더십이 교사-유아 관계 효능감을 매개로 직무열의에 미치는 영향

  • 배현순 (대구가톨릭대학교 아동학과) ;
  • 민하영 (대구가톨릭대학교 아동학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.08
  • Accepted : 2022.04.08
  • Published : 2022.04.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of perceived supervisor's servant leadership and teacher self-efficacy for positive teacher-child relationships on work engagement using the path model. Methods: The subjects were 210 teachers working at childcare centers in Daegu and Gyeongbuk Province. Questionnaires were used to investigate perceived supervisor's servant leadership, teacher self-efficacy for positive teacher-child relationships, and work engagement. The collected data were analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling(SEM), Bootstrapping, Pearson Correlation, AMOS 20.0, and SPSS 21.0. Results: First, supervisor's servant leadership had a positive influence on teacher self-efficacy for positive teacher-child relationships. Second, teacher self-efficacy for positive teacher-child relationships had a positive influence on work engagement. Third, supervisor's servant leadership had a positive influence on teacher's work engagement. Fourth, supervisor's servant leadership had an indirec effect on teacher's work engagement by teacher self-efficacy for positive teacher-child relationships. Conclusion/Implications: The results mean teacher self-efficacy for positive teacher-child relationships had more influence on teacher's work engagement. Therefore, it is more useful to promote teacher self-efficacy for positive teacher-child relationships in order to strengthen teacher's work engagement.

Keywords

References

  1. 고현 (2015). 원장의 서번트리더십이 보육교사 임파워먼트와 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 유아교육연구, 35(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2015.35.1.001
  2. 권순구, 봉미미, 김성일 (2016a). 교사-학생관계 교사효능감 척도 개발. 교육심리연구, 30(3), 469-496. https://doi.org10.17286/KJEP.2016.30.3.01
  3. 권순구, 봉미미, 김성일 (2016b). 학습자의 학업성취, 동기, 수업참여에 대한 예측요인으로서의 교사-학생관계 교사효능감. 한국교육학연구, 22(3), 265-299.
  4. 김선영, 서소정 (2010). 유아 교사 효능감 척도 개발 연구. 아동학회지, 31(4), 91-110.
  5. 김용재, 김종완 (2008). 리더십이 자기효능감을 통해 조직몰입과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향. 인적자원개발연구, 11(2), 1-23.
  6. 김희경, 신호철 (2019). 서번트 리더십이 직무열의에 미치는 영향: 긍정심리자본의 매개 및 조직정체성 강도의 조절 효과. 대한경영학회지, 32(3), 421-443. https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2019.32.3.421
  7. 맹일환 (2008). 직속상사의 카리스마 리더십과 서번트 리더십이 부하직원의 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 보험회사를 중심으로. 고려대학교 석사학위논문.
  8. 민하영 (2019). 보육교사의 주도적 성향, 사회적 관심 및 교사-유아 관계 효능감 간 경로모형 탐색. 한국아동심리치료학회지, 14(3), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.23931/kacp.2019.14.3.21
  9. 송용욱, 문명, 조윤형 (2019). 서번트 리더십이 지방자치단체 공무원의 직무열의에 미치는 영향: 직업소명의식의 매개효과, 조직정치 지각의 조절효과. 리더십연구, 10(3), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.22243/tklq.2019.10.3.3
  10. 송인숙, 권상집 (2017). 교육훈련, 서번트 리더십, 자기효능감, 교육훈련 전이, 지식공유 간의 구조적 관계 분석. 지식경영연구, 18(4), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2017.18.4.011
  11. 신현정 (2019). 영아교사의 교수효능감과 민감성이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 한국보육학회지, 19(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.21213/kjcec.2019.19.1.101
  12. 예남희, 민하영 (2014). 육아지원기관 교사의 조직몰입에 영향을 미치는 원장의 서번트 리더십과 교사의 조직 냉소주의, 임파워먼트 간의 구조적 관계. 아동학회지, 35(3), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.5723/KJCS.2014.35.3.119
  13. 예지은, 지성하, 진현 (2013). 임파워링 리더십과 직무열의의 관계에 대한 연구: 자기효능감과 의미감의 매개효과를 중심으로. 대한경영학회지, 26(2), 435-452.
  14. 이강훈, 조은래 (2017). 유아교사가 지각한 원장의 서번트 리더십과 교수몰입, 행복감 간의 관계. 한국보육지원학회지, 13(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2017.13.01.065
  15. 이완정, 최진아 (2021). 원장의 코칭리더십이 교사의 놀이실행역량에 미치는 영향: 교사의 반성적 사고와 창의적 역할수행의 매개효과. 한국보육지원학회지, 17(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2021.17.02.089
  16. 이재무 (2016). 보육교사의 직무스트레스가 조직신뢰에 미치는 영향과 직무열의, 조직몰입의 조절효과. 육아정책연구소, 10(2), 51-82.
  17. 정은진 (2018). 코칭리더십이 신입사원의 조직사회화를 통해 직무열의에 미치는 영향: 주도적 성격의 조절효과를 중심으로. 고려대학교 석사학위논문.
  18. 조성자, 문수백, 민하영 (2008). 유아교육기관 교사의 지각된 자아효능감과 사회적 지지가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 가정과삶의질연구, 26(2), 25-32.
  19. 최권, 도승이 (2015). 초등교사가 지각한 직무환경이 개인적, 집단적 교사효능감을 매개로 직무만족에 미치는 영향. 교육학연구, 53(2), 161-183.
  20. 최민수, 윤영애 (2019). 자아탄력성, 직무환경, 직무열의가 보육교사의 이직의도에 미치는 영향분석. 한국영유아보육학, 116, 123-143. https://doi.org/10.37918/kce.2019.05.116.123
  21. 허영림, 정선영 (2009). 보육교사가 인지한 시설장의 서번트리더십이 보육교사의 직장내 인간관계와 직무 및 직무환경 만족도에 미치는 영향. 열린유아교육연구, 14(2), 91-110.
  22. Antioco, M., Moenaert, R. K., Lindgreen, A. & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2008). Organizational antecedents to and consequences of service business orientations in manufacturing companies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(3), 337-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0085-1
  23. Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718403500507
  24. Bakker, A. B. & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596
  25. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  26. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In Preventing AIDS (pp. 25-59). MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1193-3_3
  27. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: W. H. Freeman.
  28. Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  29. Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5
  30. Bollen, K., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/271084
  31. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
  32. Decuypere, A. & Schaufeli, W. (2019). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219892197
  33. Dobransky, N. D. & Ann Bainbridge Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370193
  34. Elliott, E. M., Isaacs, M. L., & Chugani, C. D. (2010). Promoting self-efficacy in early career teachers: A principal's guide for differentiated mentoring and supervision. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 4(1), 131-146.
  35. Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. IN: The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
  36. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
  37. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Cappella, E., Atkins, M., Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461-487. https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
  38. Hartz, K., Williford, A. P., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Teachers' perceptions of teacher-child relationships: Links with children's observed interactions. Early Education and Development, 28(4), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1246288
  39. Hipp, K. A. & Bredeson, P. V. (1995). Exploring connections between teacher efficacy and principals' leadership behavior. Journal of School Leadership, 5,(2) 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268469500500202
  40. Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
  41. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  42. Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36(4), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291366
  43. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  44. Khan, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
  45. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: The Guilford Press.
  46. Laub, J. (2005). From paternalism to the servant organization: Expanding the Organizational Leadership Assessment (OLA) model. The International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 1(1), 155-186. https://doi.org/10.33972/ijsl.326
  47. Lundberg, U. & Schaufeli, W. (2006). "Same same" but different?: Can work engagement be discriminated from iob involvement and organizational commitment?. European Psychologist, 11(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.119
  48. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
  49. Pianta, R. C. & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children's success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 444-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086261
  50. Robinson, J. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
  51. Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms?. Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.005
  52. Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept. In Bakker, A. B. & Leiter, M. P. (Eds) Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research(pp. 10-24). NY: Psychology Press.
  53. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  54. Split, J., Koomen, H., & Thijs, J. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9170-y
  55. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  56. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
  57. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
  58. Woolfolk, A. E., Hoy, W. K., & Davis, H. A. (2006). Teacher self-efficacy and its influence on the achievement of adolescents. In F. Pajares, & Urban(Eds.), Self efficacy beliefs of adolescents(pp. 117-137). NY: H. H. Freeman.
  59. Zheng, Y. Graham, L., Epitropaki, O., & Snape, E. (2019). Service leadership, work engagement, and service performance: The moderating role of leader skills. Group & Organization Management, 45(1), 43-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601119851978