DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of PM2.5 Exposure Contribution Using a Microenvironmental Model

국소환경 모델을 이용한 초미세먼지(PM2.5) 노출 기여율 평가

  • Shin, Jihun (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Choe, Yongtae (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Dongjun (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Min, Gihong (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Woo, Jaemin (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Dongjun (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Shin, Junghyun (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Cho, Mansu (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Sung, Kyeonghwa (Center of Environmental Health Monitoring, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Lee, Jongdae (Department of Environmental Health Science, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Yang, Wonho (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 신지훈 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 최영태 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 김동준 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 민기홍 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 우재민 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 김동준 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 신정현 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 조만수 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 성경화 (대구가톨릭대학교 환경보건모니터링센터) ;
  • 이종대 (순천향대학교 환경보건학과) ;
  • 양원호 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.13
  • Accepted : 2022.04.01
  • Published : 2022.04.30

Abstract

Background: Since people move through microenvironments rather than staying in one place, they may be exposed to both indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the exposure level of each sub-population group and evaluate the contribution rate of the major microenvironments. Methods: Exposure scenarios for sub-population groups were constructed on the basis of a 2019 Time-Use survey and the previous literature. A total of five population groups were classified and researchers wearing MicroPEM simulated monitoring PM2.5 exposure concentrations in real-time over three days. The exposure contribution for each microenvironment were evaluated by multiplying the inhalation rate and the PM2.5 exposure concentration levels. Results: Mean PM2.5 concentrations were 33.0 ㎍/m3 and 22.5 ㎍/m3 in Guro-gu and Wonju, respectively. When the exposure was calculated considering each inhalation rate and concentration, the home showed the highest exposure contribution rate for PM2.5. As for preschool children, it was 90.8% in Guro-gu, 94.1% in Wonju. For students it was 65.3% and 67.3%. For housewives it was 98.2% and 95.8%, and 59.5% and 91.7% for office workers. Both regions had higher exposure to PM2.5 among the elderly compared to other populations, and their PM2.5 exposure contribution rates were 98.3% and 94.1% at home for Guro-gu and Wonju, respectively. Conclusions: The exposure contribution rate could be dependent on time spent in microenvironments. Notably, the contribution rate of exposure to PM2.5 at home was the highest because most people spend the longest time at home. Therefore, microenvironments such as home with a higher contribution rate of exposure to PM2.5 could be managed to upgrade public health.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 환경성질환예측평가기술개발 사업의 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다 (과제번호: 2021003320001).

References

  1. World Health Organization. Household Air Pollution and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  2. Chen J, Zhou C, Wang S, Hu J. Identifying the socioeconomic determinants of population exposure to particulate matter (PM2.5) in China using geographically weighted regression modeling. Environ Pollut. 2018; 241: 494-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.083
  3. Li C, Bai L, He Z, Liu X, Xu X. The effect of air purifiers on the reduction in indoor PM2.5 concentrations and population health improvement. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021; 75: 103298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103298
  4. Jeong H, Park D. Contribution of time-activity pattern and microenvironment to black carbon (BC) inhalation exposure and potential internal dose among elementary school children. Atmos Environ. 2017; 164: 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.007
  5. Anderson HR, Favarato G, Atkinson RW. Long-term exposure to air pollution and the incidence of asthma: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2013; 6: 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0144-5
  6. Schweizer C, Edwards RD, Bayer-Oglesby L, Gauderman WJ, Ilacqua V, Jantunen MJ, et al. Indoor time-microenvironment-activity patterns in seven regions of Europe. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007; 17(2): 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500490
  7. Kim Y, Yang W, Son B. Estimation of total exposure to benzene, toluene and xylene by microenvironmental measurements for iron mill workers. Korean J Environ Health. 2007; 33(5): 359-364. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2007.33.5.359
  8. Ryu H, Yoon H, Eom I, Park J, Kim S, Cho M, et al. Time-activity pattern assessment for Korean students. J Environ Health Sci. 2018; 44(2): 143-152.
  9. Guak S, Lee S, An J, Lee H, Lee K. A model for population exposure to PM2.5: identification of determinants for high population exposure in Seoul. Environ Pollut. 2021; 285: 117406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117406
  10. Park J, Jo W, Cho M, Lee J, Lee H, Seo S, et al. Spatial and temporal exposure assessment to PM2.5 in a community using sensor-based air monitoring instruments and dynamic population distributions. Atmosphere. 2020; 11(12): 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11121284
  11. Cha S, Han Y, Bae G. Spatio-temporal distribution of PM10 and PM2.5 in Gangwon province of South Korea using air pollution monitoring network data. J Korean Soc Atmos Environ. 2020; 36(4): 492-506. https://doi.org/10.5572/kosae.2020.36.4.492
  12. Park J, Yang S, Park Y, Ryu H, Kim E, Choe Y, et al. Exposure and risk assessment of benzene and PM10 for sub-populations using Monte-Carlo simulations. J Environ Health Sci. 2019; 45(3): 247-257.
  13. National Institute of Environmental Research. Korean Exposure Factor Handbook for Children. Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2019.
  14. Statistics Korea. Time Use Survey 2019. Daejeon: Statistic Korea; 2020. Available: https://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/6/4/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=384161&pageNo=&rowNum=10&amSeq=&sTarget=&sTxt= [accessed 12 February 2022].
  15. Du Y, Wang Q, Sun Q, Zhang T, Li T, Yan B. Assessment of PM2.5 monitoring using MicroPEM: a validation study in a city with elevated PM2.5 levels. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019; 171: 518-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.002
  16. National Institute of Environmental Research. Korean Exposure Factor Handbook. Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2019.
  17. Moschandreas DJ, Watson J, D'Abreton P, Scire J, Zhu T, Klein W, et al. Chapter three: methodology of exposure modeling. Chemosphere. 2002; 49: 923-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00237-0
  18. Lizana J, Almeida SM, Serrano-Jimenez A, Becerra JA, Gil-Baez M, Barrios-Padura A, et al. Contribution of indoor microenvironments to the daily inhaled dose of air pollutants in children. The importance of bedrooms. Build Environ. 2020; 183: 107188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107188
  19. Statistics Korea. Life Tables for Korea 2020. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2021.
  20. Cho H, Choi J, No W, Oh M, Kim Y. Accessibility of welfare facilities for elderly people in Daejeon, South Korea considering public transportation accessibility. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021; 12: 100514.
  21. Sun W, Wang Y. Coupling analysis of transportation system and public cultural facilities based on POI Data--take Xi'an as an example. World Sci Res J. 2021; 7(4): 414-422.
  22. Jeong J, Lee S. Spatial distribution of particulate matters in comparison with land-use and traffic volume in Seoul, Republic of Korea. J Cadastre Land InformatiX. 2018; 48(1): 123-138. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2018.48.1.123
  23. Lim S, Kim J, Kim T, Lee K, Yang W, Jun S, et al. Personal exposures to PM2.5 and their relationships with microenvironmental concentrations. Atmos Environ. 2012; 47: 407-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.043
  24. Kornartit C, Sokhi RS, Burton MA, Ravindra K. Activity pattern and personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide in indoor and outdoor microenvironments. Environ Int. 2010; 36(1): 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.09.004
  25. Burke JM, Zufall MJ, Ozkaynak H. A population exposure model for particulate matter: case study results for PM(2.5) in Philadelphia, PA. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001; 11(6): 470-489. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/jea/7500188
  26. Scibor M, Balcerzak B, Galbarczyk A, Targosz N, Jasienska G. Are we safe inside? Indoor air quality in relation to outdoor concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 and to characteristics of homes. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019; 48, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101537
  27. Korhonen A, Relvas H, Miranda AI, Ferreira J, Lopes D, Rafael S, et al. Analysis of spatial factors, time-activity and infiltration on outdoor generated PM2.5 exposures of school children in five European cities. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 785: 147111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147111
  28. Statistics Korea. Population and Housing Census 2020. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2021.
  29. Buonanno G, Stabile L, Morawska L. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles: the influence of time-activity patterns. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 468-469: 903-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.016