References
- Y. C. Kuo, A. E. Walker, K. E. Schroder & B. R. Belland. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The internet and higher education, 20, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
- M. Weigold. (2020). Succeeding in Online Advertising Education. Journal of Advertising Education, 24(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098048220917129
- R. M. Bernard, P. C. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, L. Wozney & B. Huang, (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
- B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia & K. Jones. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
- I. E. Allen & J. Seaman. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Sloan Consortium (NJ1).
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-07. US Department of Education. NCES 2009-044.
- D. Klein & M. Ware. (2003). E-learning: New opportunities in continuing professional development. Learned publishing, 16(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103320995078
- A. F. Algahtani. (2011). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the E-learning Experience in Some Universities in Saudi Arabia from Male Students' Perceptions, Durham theses, Durham University.
- J. R. Marc. (2002). Book review: e-learning strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 185-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00082-9
- S. Hameed, A. Badii & A. J. Cullen. (2008, May). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended learning environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (pp. 25-26).
- J. Smedley. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR insight, 23(4), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2010.11
- N. Wagner, K. Hassanein & M. Head. (2008). Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders' analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26-36.
- L. M. Angelino, F. K. Williams & D. Natvig. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), n2.
- S. Carr. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39-A41.
- L. V. Morris, C. Finnegan & S. S. Wu. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.009
- K. Frankola. (2001). Why online learners drop out. WORKFORCE-COSTA MESA-, 80(10), 52-61.
- J. Short, E. Williams & B. Christie. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
- C. H. Tu. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, 1(2), 34-45.
- C. H. Tu & M. McIsaac. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American journal of distance education, 16(3), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
- C. N. Gunawardena & F. J. Zittle. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
- A. G. Picciano. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous learning networks, 6(1), 21-40.
- K. Swan & L. F. Shih. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.
- R. D. Johnson, H. Gueutal & C. M. Falbe. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e learning effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910974125
- C. Hostetter & M. Busch. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-12.
- J. C. Richardson & K. Swan. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
- T. Anderson, R. Liam, D. R. Garrison & W. Archer. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
- P. J. Shea, A. M. Pickett & W. E. Pelz. (2003). A follow-up investigation of "teaching presence" in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 7(2), 61-80.
- Y. J. Joo, K. Y. Lim & E. K. Kim. (2011). Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & ducation, 57(2), 1654-1664.
- A. Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
- A. Bandura. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- S. S. Liaw & H. M. Huang. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
- D. Shen, M. H. Cho, C. L. Tsai & R. Marra. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
- E. Alqurashi. (2017). Self-efficacy and the interaction model as predictors of student satisfaction and perceived learning in online learning environments. (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University).
- J. C. Hong, M. Y. Hwang, E. Szeto, C. R. Tsai, Y. C. Kuo & W. Y. Hsu. (2016). Internet cognitive failure relevant to self-efficacy, learning interest, and satisfaction with social media learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.010
- J. C. Womble. (2007). E-learning: The relationship among learner satisfaction, self-efficacy, and usefulness (pp. 1-132). Alliant International University, San Diego.
- Y. M. Lin, G. Y. Lin & J. M. Laffey. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.1.a
- S. S. Liaw. (2008). Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
- S. B. Eom & N. Ashill. (2016). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097
- Y. Malhotra & D. F. Galletta. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers (pp. 14-pp). IEEE.
- H. Gangadharbatla. (2020). What we stand to lose with fully online advertising education. Journal of Advertising Education, 24(1), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098048220916919