DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Content Analysis of Social Media Influencer Research in Korea

한국 소셜 미디어 인플루언서 연구의 내용분석

  • Choi, Yun-Woo (Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Hanyang University) ;
  • Han, Sangpil (Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Hanyang University)
  • 최윤우 (한양대학교 광고홍보학과) ;
  • 한상필 (한양대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.14
  • Accepted : 2022.04.20
  • Published : 2022.04.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the research trend on social media influencers in Korea. To this end, a total of 178 papers on social media influencers were analyzed from 2009 to 2021 among the academic papers registered in the Korean Academic Citation Index. As a result, the early social media influencer research, which was limited to only a few fields such as fashion, beauty, and communication, has expanded to various ones as time passed and achieved quantitative growth. The proportion of empirical studies has been on the rise in recent years, and studies that applied qualitative research methodologies have shown a tendency to decrease. The proportion of research focusing on specific media platforms and influencer types gets lower, although both the characteristics of social media platforms and the attitudes of each influencer are very diverse. This study has academic significance in that it is the first empirical study to investigate the current status of the social media influencer research in Korea.

본 연구는 전세계적으로 주목받고 있는 소셜 미디어 인플루언서의 국내연구 동향을 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 한국학술인용색인에 등재된 학술논문 가운데, 2009년부터 2021년까지 소셜 인플루언서를 주제로 한 논문 총 178편을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 패션 및 뷰티, 커뮤니케이션 등 특정분야에 국한되어 있던 초기 소셜 미디어 인플루언서 연구는 시간이 흐를수록 다양한 학문분야로 확장되며 양적 성장을 이루고 있었다. 실증연구의 비중은 최근 들어 높아지는 추세이며, 질적 연구방법론을 적용한 연구들은 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 소셜 미디어 플랫폼의 특성은 매우 다양하고 각 플랫폼에서 활동하는 인플루언서의 유형과 속성 역시 이질적임에도 불구하고, 특정 미디어 플랫폼 및 인플루언서 유형에 대한 연구 비중은 오히려 더 낮아지는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 국내 소셜 미디어 인플루언서 연구의 현주소를 조망하는 첫 실증연구라는 점에서 학문적 의의를 지닌다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Y. Kim & H. Y. Kim. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223-232. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024
  2. S. C. Chang, C. C. Wang & C. Y. Kuo. (2020). Social Influencer Research: An bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 11(2), 75-86. DOI : 10.7903/ijecs.1975
  3. L. R. Flynn, R. E. Goldsmith, & J. K. Eastman. (1996). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 24(2), 137. DOI : 10.1177/0092070396242004
  4. L. V. Casalo, C. Flavian & S. Ibanez-Sanchez. (2018). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510-519. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusr es.2018.07.005
  5. G. Appel, L. Grewal, R. Hadi & A. T. Stephen. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79-95. DOI : 10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
  6. Edelman. (2019). 2019 Edelman trust barometer. Newyork : Edelman.
  7. C. Campbell & J. R. Farrell. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469-479. DOI : 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
  8. S. Hwang & M. C. Lee. (2021). Analysis of the Value Change of Virtual Influencers as Seen in the Press and Social Media Using Text Mining. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 23(4), 265-299. DOI : 10.16914/kjapr.2021.23.4.265
  9. K. Etzkorn. (2021. 4. 9.). How digital shopping will evolve: Three trends to watch. Forbes [Online]. www.forbes.com
  10. M. Iqani. (2019). Picturing luxury, producing value: The cultural labour of social media Brand influencers in South Africa. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(2), 229-247. DOI : 10.1177/1367877918821237
  11. X. Chen & A. Y. K. Chua. (2020). Reviewing the Landscape of Research on Influencer-generated Content. 2020 6th International Conference, 244-248. DOI : 10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244706
  12. D. Vrontis, A. Makrides & M. Christofi. (2020). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617-644. DOI : 10.1111/ijcs.12647
  13. L. Hudders, S. D. Jans & M. D. Veirman. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327-375. DOI : 10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925
  14. S. K. Hong. (2012). Research in Production and Operations Management-Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 23(4), 335-350. DOI : 10.1007/s40171-018-0201-0
  15. I. Zupic & T. Cater. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. DOI : 10.1177/1094428114562629
  16. J. S. Hwang & J. S. Doh. (2017). Advances in Research Methodology in Digital Media Advertising Research. Advertising Research, 115, 143-191. DOI : 10.16914/ar.2017.115.143
  17. S. P. Han et al. (2020). Thirty years of advertising research in Korea and its perspective. Seoul : Hakjisa.
  18. S. P. Han & H. S. Lee. (2014). A Content Analysis of the Korean Journal of Advertising's Research Trends: A Twenty-Five Year Appraisal from 1990 to 2014. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 25(8), 7-33. DOI : 10.14377/KJA.2014.11.30.7
  19. L. Hu, Q. Han, S. Han. & Z. Liu. (2020). Understanding followers' stickiness to digital influencers: The effect of psychological responses. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102169. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102169
  20. H. Reinikainen, J. Munnukka, D. Maity & V. Luoma-aho. (2020). 'You really are a great big sister'-Parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 279-298. DOI : 10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781
  21. D. J. MacInnis. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154. DOI : 10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
  22. Influencer Marketing Hub. (2019). The State of Influencer Marketing 2019: Benchmark Repor.t Influencer Marketing Hub [Online]. www.influencermarketinghub.com