DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지속가능한 의류관리를 위한 최적 세탁코스 연구 - 세탁코스, 세탁성, 섬유손상도, 세제농도를 중심으로 -

Optimal washing course for sustainable laundering and care - Focusing on the washing course, detergency, fabric damage and detergent concentration -

  • 백성필 (한양대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 박세은 (한양대학교 의류학과 휴먼테크융합전공) ;
  • 박명자 (한양대학교 의류학과 휴먼테크융합전공)
  • Seong Phil, Baek (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • Seeun, Park (Human-Tech Convergence Program, Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • Myung-Ja, Park (Human-Tech Convergence Program, Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.14
  • 심사 : 2022.12.01
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31

초록

The purpose of this research is to improve sustainable clothes care by comparing household washer's standard course and quick course. Detergency at each course was classified by laundry weight, detergent concentration, and soils. Also, fabric damage from each course was compared. Washing experiments were carried out using two types of washing machines and three types of detergents. Using the standard soiled fabrics of EMPA 108 set, detergency was compared by laundry weight, soil, and detergent concentration. Additionally, fabric damage was evaluated using the mechanical action of MA-40. The results of the research were as follows. First, a standard course, having more working time exhibited better detergency than a quick course. However, the detergency deviation under 6kg laundry weight was as low as 9.0%. Second, detergency by the type of soil was more effective in standard course than in a quick course, but hydrophilic protein soils had a small detergency deviation at 7.6%. Moreover, hydrophobic oil, complex, and particulate soils had a higher deviation at 19.7% Third, fabric damage was in proportion to operating time. Fourth, a quick course showed approximately 80% detergency regardless of the type of detergent. in the case of using 50% of the recommended allowance by the detergent manufacturer. In conclusion, reducing the operating washing time and detergent concentration is in accordance with increasing sustainability, in the case of washing with lightly soiled fabrics under 6kg of laundry weight.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 유한빈, 김인숙. (2020). 수입 세제 가격 및 실태 조사. 한국소비자원 KCA보고서.
  2. Choi, S., Kwon, M., Park, M. J., & Kim, J. (2021). Analysis of microplastics released from textiles according to filter pore size and fabric weight during washing. Journal of the Korea Fashion and Costume Design Association, 23(1), 37-45.
  3. Chung, H. W., & Kim, H. J. (2011). Effects of alkalinity and hardness of washing solutions on the color and removal of red-wine soil. Textile Science and Engineering, 48(6), 331-339.
  4. Chung, H. W., & Kim, H. J. (2012). Effect of washing solution characteristics on the removal and color of cocoa stains. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 14(3), 492-500. https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.3.492
  5. Chung, H. W., & Kim, M. K. (2007). The soil removal of artificially soiled fabrics with commercial detergents at various washing conditions. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 9(6), 671-678.
  6. Chung, H.-W., Kim, M. K., & Kim, H. S. (2006). Optimum washing conditions of artificially soiled cloths in a drum-type washing machine. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 30(11), 1589-1597.
  7. Franklin Associates. (1993). Resource and environmental profile analysis of a manufactured apparel product: Woman's knit polyester blouse. Washington DC: American Fiber Manufacturers Association.
  8. Jack, T. (2013). Laundry routine and resource consumption in Australia. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(6), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12048
  9. Kang, I. S., Jo, S. J., & Kim, Y. S. (2003). A study on non-detergent course of washing machine. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 5(5), 539-544.
  10. KS C IEC 60456.(2007). Clothes washing machines for household use - Methods for measuring the performance. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards.
  11. Kim, J., Yun, C., Park, Y., & Park, C. H. (2015). Post-consumer energy consumption of textile products during 'use' phase of the lifecycle. Fibers and Polymers, 16(4), 926-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-0926-8
  12. Lee, H. S., Lee, J., Kim, S. G., Kim, M., & Lee, H. (2004). A study on the laundry behavior of university students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 16(3), 147-161.
  13. Lee, J. J., & Kim, Y. K. (2011). Soil removal and residue of detergent ingredients at various detergent concentrations. Textile Science and Engineering, 48(2), 85-90.
  14. Piao, S., & Park, M. J. (2013). Comparison of detergency effectiveness by the type of household washer, detergent and soil -Focused on detergency, rinsing, fabric damage and tanglement. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 21(6), 950-960. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2013.21.6.950
  15. Seong, H.-Y., & Lee, J. S. (2010). The effect of washing machine type on the behavior of clothing management and consumer satisfaction. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 12(3), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2010.12.3.389
  16. Wee, J., Lee, Y. J., & Jung, H. J. (2021). A study on sustainable laundry behavior-comparison between Korean and European consumers. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 45(3), 525-545. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2021.45.3.525
  17. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future: The world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Yun, C., Ryu, H., & Park, S. (2018). Sustainability of Textile products based on washing conditions: Focusing on the washing temperature and washing time. Family and Environment Research, 56(5), 417-424.