대한감각통합치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)

  • 제20권3호
  • /
  • Pages.38-47
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1738-0405(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-115X(eISSN)
대한감각통합치료학회 (Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 기질 및 성격발달에 감각처리가 미치는 영향

Effect of Sensory Processing Patterns on Temperament and Character Traits in Undergraduate Students

  • 김슬기 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 강찬미 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 권진하 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김민규 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김성현 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 조유정 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김은영 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Kim, Seul-Kee (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kang, Chan Mi (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kwon, Jin Ha (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Kyu (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hyun (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Cho, Yu-Jeong (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Young (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.01
  • 심사 : 2022.12.17
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구는 대학생의 감각처리가 기질과 성격 특성에 어떻게 영향을 주는지 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 대학생 참가자 107명이 편의표본 추출방법으로 2022년 9월에 모집되어 청소년/성인 감각프로파일(Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile; AASP)과 기질 및 성격 검사(Temperament and Character Inventory; TCI)를 작성하였다. 다중회귀모형을 사용하여 기질 척도(자극추구, 위험회피, 사회적 민감성, 인내력) 및 성격 척도(자율성, 연대감, 자기초월)의 각 준거 변인에 대한 감각처리 사분면(저등록, 감각추구, 감각민감, 감각회피) 예언 변인의 영향을 분석하였다. 결과 : 감각추구 행동이 빈번할수록 자극추구, 사회적 민감성, 인내력 기질 및 자율성, 자기초월 성격이 높게 나타났고 위험회피 기질은 낮게 나타났다. 저등록 행동이 빈번할수록 위험회피 기질이 높은 반면, 사회적 민감성과 인내력 기질 및 자율성 성격은 낮게 나타났다. 감각민감 행동이 빈번할수록 사회적 민감성 기질이 높았지만 감각회피 행동이 빈번할수록 사회적 민감성 기질이 낮았다. 결론 : 본 연구는 초기 성인기의 감각처리 패턴이 자극추구, 위험회피, 사회적 민감성, 인내력 기질 및 자율성, 자기초월 성격에 영향을 미침을 제시한다.

Objective : We investigated how sensory processing patterns contribute to temperament and character traits in undergraduate students. Methods : A total of 107 undergraduate students were recruited in September 2022 via convenient sampling method. They completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile and the Temperament and Character Inventory. Multiple regression models were applied to analyze the effect of sensory processing quadrants (low registration, sensation seeking, sensory sensitivity, sensation avoiding) on each temperament (novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, persistence) and character (self-directedness, cooperativeness, self-transcendence) traits. Results : Sensation seeking significantly predicted high levels of novelty seeking, reward dependence, persistence, self-directedness, and self-transcendence but low harm avoidance. Low registration predicted high harm avoidance but low levels of reward dependence, persistence, and self-directedness. Reward dependence was predicted by high sensory sensitivity and low sensation avoiding. Conclusion : This study demonstrated that sensory processing patterns affected novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, persistence, self-directedness, and self-transcendence in young adults.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 순천향대학교 학술연구비 지원 및 교육부와 한국연구재단의 재원으로 지원을 받아 수행된 3단계 산학협력 선도대학 육성사업(LINC 3.0)의 연구결과입니다(No. 1345356224).

참고문헌

  1. Brown, C., & Dunn, W. (2002). Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
  2. Chess, S., & Thomas, A. (1998). The New York longitudinal scales adult temperament questionnaire test manual. Scottsdale, AZ: Behavioral Developmental Initiatives.
  3. Choi, E., Kim, Y., Baek, D., Hong, K., & Jung, H. (2015). The relationship between sensory processing feature and personality in early adolescents. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 18(1), 23-30.
  4. Choi, J., Kim, J., & Lee, T. (2010). Relationship between sensory processing styles and personality. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 23(4), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2015.23.4.03
  5. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44(6), 573-588. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180093014
  6. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of Genernal Psychiatry, 50(12), 975-990. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008 
  7. Dean, E. E., Little, L., Tomchek, S., & Dunn, W. (2018). Sensory processing in the general population: Adaptability, resiliency, and challenging behavior. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 7201195060p1-7201195060p8. doi:10.5014/ajot.2018.019919 
  8. Dunn, W. (2014). Sensory Profile 2 user's manual. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
  9. Jung, H. (2016). Technical adequacy of Korean Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (K-AASP) (Doctoral dissertation). Inje University, Gimhae. 
  10. Jung, S., Choi, W., Lee, J., Lee, S., & Kang, E. (2017). The correlation of sensory processing type, school record and self-esteem in the college students. Korean Entertainment Industry Association, 11(6), 247-253. doi:10.21184/jkeia.2017.08.11.6.247 
  11. Kim, S., & Kim, E. Y. (2021). Effect of early childhood sensory processing in temperament and character traits. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 19(3), 13-21. doi:10.18064/JKASI.2021.19.3.13 
  12. Korean Society Aptitude Development. (1983). Korean aptitude development. Seoul: Korean Society Aptitude Development. 
  13. McCourt, W. F., Gurrera, R. J., & Cutter, H. S. (1993). Sensation seeking and novelty seeking. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181(5), 309-312.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199305000-00006
  14. McRae, K., Gross, J. J., Weber, J., Robertson, E. R., SokolHessner, P., Ray, R. D., ... Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The development of emotion regulation: An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal in children, adolescents and young adults. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 11-22. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr093 
  15. Min, B. B., Oh, H, S., & Lee, J. Y. (2007). Temperament and Character Inventory-family manual. Seoul: Total Psychological Service. 
  16. Rohner, R. P. (1990). Handbook for the study of parental acceptance and rejection (3rd ed). Storrs, CT: Rohner Research Publications. 
  17. Woo, H., & Choi, Y. (2018). The effects of sensory processing types on the psychosocial factors of college students. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(9), 819-826. doi:10.21742/AJMAHS.2018.09.71 
  18. Yoon, S., Lee, C., Kim, H., & Jung, H. (2017). The correlation between sensory process type and interpersonal problem adult attachment on university students. Journal of Korean Society of Community Based Occupational Therapy, 7(2), 9-18. doi:10.18598/kcbot.2017.07.02.02 
  19. Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139