DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Dispute Resolution Procedures under the German Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution Act

독일의 대체적 소비자분쟁해결법상 분쟁해결 절차에 관한 연구 -분쟁조정인의 법적 지위와 역할을 중심으로-

  • 성준호 (성균관대학교 법학연구원, 광운대학교)
  • Received : 2022.02.10
  • Accepted : 2022.02.28
  • Published : 2022.03.01

Abstract

The legal integration in the European Union that seeks a unified system in consumer disputes and the German Consumer Dispute Mediation Act based on this pursues the procedural fairness of consumer disputes and the equality of results. The role and legal status of the dispute mediator, who plays a very important role in this process, and the stable operation of the dispute resolution system and the guarantee of reasonable results through the guarantee of fairness and independence are very important values. In particular, the dispute mediator under the Act is conceptually different from the existing mediator or mediator, and through this distinction, the duties and contents of the dispute mediator are also distinguished. For this reason, the qualifications of dispute mediators that affect the outcome of dispute mediation are strictly stipulated. There have been some criticisms of this strictness, and such strictness is also seen as an excessive limitation. However, these standards can be understood as one of the efforts to make the dispute mediation procedure more systematic and to operate objectively in accordance with laws and procedures. In addition, in relation to the issue of independence and impartiality of the dispute mediator, the status of the dispute mediator is guaranteed in various aspects. In economic terms, it is not influenced by external factors, and furthermore, in order to guarantee job stability, the results of job security and dispute resolution are not linked. By examining the appropriate level of discipline for these dispute mediators, we expect the developmental growth of the consumer dispute resolution system under our Act.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 중견연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5A2A01047227)

References

  1. 성준호, 'EU소비자분쟁 ADR지침'의 입법권고에 따른 독일의 '대체적 소비자분쟁해결법', 한국소비자법학회, 소비자법연구 제4권 제2호, 2018.
  2. 성준호, "국경넘은 소비자 분쟁에 있어서 ODR", 중재연구 제25권 제1호, 한국중재학회, 2015.
  3. 성준호, "인터넷을 통한 국제소비자거래에서의 분쟁 해소방안 - ODR을 통한분쟁해결방안을 중심으로 -", 중재연구 제28권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2018.
  4. 손현, "EU의 소비자 ADR 및 ODR에 관한 새로운 규정 논의와 국내에의 시사점", 「중재연구」 제23권 제1호, 한국중재학회, 2013.
  5. 이로리, 'Mediation'과 'Conciliation'의 개념에 관한 비교법적 연구", 중재연구제19권제2 호, 한국중재학회, 2009.
  6. 양창수, 독일민법전, 박영사, 2021.
  7. Althammer, Christoph/Meller-Hannich, Caroline,, VSBG, Kommentar, Wolfgang Metzner Verlag, 2017.
  8. Borowski, Sascha/Rothemeyer, Peter/Steike, Jorn, Verbraucherstreitbeilegungsgesetz, 2. Auflage, NOMOS, 2020.(zit. HK-VSBG/Rothemeyer)
  9. Greger, Reinhard, Der ,,zertifizierte Mediator" - Heilsbringer oder Schreckgespenst?, ZKM 2012, 36 (37).
  10. Klowait, Jurgen, ,,Zertifizierter Mediator" - Empfehlenswertes Selbstmarketing oder unzulas ige Irrefuhrung?, ZKM 2015, 194.
  11. Munchner Kommentar zur ZPO, Band 1, 6. Auflage 2020(zit. MuKoZPO)
  12. Ring, Gerhard, Das neue Verbraucherstreitbeilegungsgesetz (VSBG) in der anwaltlichen Praxis, Deutscher Anwaltverlag & Institut der Anwaltschaft GmbH, 2016.
  13. Roder, Matthias/Rothemeyer, Peter/Braun,Felix, Verbraucherstreitbeilegungsgesetz, Verlag C. H. Beck, 2017.
  14. Rothemeyer, Peter, Die Zertifizierungsfiktion, ZKM 2014, 65.
  15. Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 258/15
  16. Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 18/5089
  17. Richtlinie 2013/11/EU des Europaischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 21. Mai 2013 uber die alternative Beilegung verbraucherrechtlicher Streitigkeiten und zur Anderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2006/2004 und der Richtlinie 2009/22/EG (Richtlinie uber alternative Streitbeilegung in Verbraucherangelegenheiten)(https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/DE/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013L0011)
  18. Verordnung (EG) Nr. 861/2007 des Europaischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Juli 2007 zur Einfuhrung eines europaischen Verfahrens fur geringfugige Forderungen (Verordnung uber Verfahrens fur geringfugige Forderungen)(https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32007R0861)