과제정보
이 논문은 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5A2A03048062).
참고문헌
- AAAS (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
- AAAS (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy: A tool for curriculum reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice: Teachers College Press.
- Albe, V. (2008). Students' positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17(8/9), 805-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9086-6
- Barrue, C., & Albe, V. (2013). Citizenship Education and Socioscientific Issues: Implicit Concept of Citizenship in the Curriculum, Views of French Middle School Teachers. Science & Education, 22(5), 1089-1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9571-4
- Beck, U. (1997). Risk society - Towards a new modernity, (trans., Hong, S.). Seoul: Saemulgyul.
- Bencze, L., & Pouliot, C. (2017). Battle of the bands: Toxic dust, active citizenship and science education. In Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments, (pp. 381-404). Springer.
- Bencze, L., Pouliot, C., Pedretti, E., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., & Zeidler, D. (2020). SAQ, SSI and STSE education: defending and extending "science-in-context". Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 825-851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09962-7
- Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students' Research-Informed Socio-scientific Activism: Re/Visions for a Sustainable Future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3
- Blondiaux, L., & Sintomer, Y. (2002). L'imperatif deliberatif. Politix. Revue des sciences sociales du politique, 15(57), 17-35.
- Boeren, E., & Field, J. (2019). 4th Global Report on Adult Learning and Education: Leave No One Behind--Participation, Equity and Inclusion. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
- Bosser, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students' Positioning in the Classroom: a Study of Teacher-Student Interactions in a Socioscientific Issue Context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1
- Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la democratie technique: Seuil.
- Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A., & Scott, C. M. (2015). Agency amidst formidable structures: How girls perform gender in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21224
- Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view on socio-scientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-24.
- Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Reconceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
- Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S.-N., & Hoglund, H.-O. (2012). Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students' Use of Supporting Reasons in Arguing Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 21(3), 342-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9328-x
- Chung, Y. L., & Choi, J. M. (2007). An assessment of the scientific literacy of secondary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(1), 9-17.
- Commission of the European Communities(2002). European Report on Quality Indicators of Lifelong Learning: Fifteen Quality Indicators. European Commission. Directorate-General for Education and Culture.
- DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Delors, J. et al. (1996) Learning: the treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO.
- Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.31.787.121
- Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and its Problems. New York: Holt.
- Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
- Es, H., & Ozturk, N. (2021). An Activity for Transferring the Multidimensional Structure of SSI to Middle School Science Courses: I Discover Myself in the Decision-Making Process with SEE-STEP! Research in Science Education, 51(3), 889-910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09865-1
- Faure, E. et al. (1972) Learning to Be. The World of Education Today and Tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.
- Feinstein, N. W. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science education, 95(1), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414
- Feinstein, N. W. (2015). Education, communication, and science in the public sphere. Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21192
- Field, J. (2000). Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
- Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
- Han, S. (2009). Lifelong Education 3rd Ed. Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Han, S., Yang, E., & Lim, H. (2020). Conceptual Ecology of 'Lifelong Learning:' Expansion, Interconnection and Evolution. Journal of Lifelong Education. 26(2), 1-39.
- Herman, B. C. (2018). Students' environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433
- Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science education, 83(6), 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<775::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-8
- Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
- Hodson, D. (2017). Foreword: The Significance of STEPWISE for Fostering Life-Long Sociopolitical Activism. In Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 3-18). Springer.
- Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
- Hwang, S. (2018). Research trend on the sociocultural approaches to science learning identity for the realization of 'Science Education for All'. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 38(2), 187-202.
- Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2012). Body talk: students' identity construction while discussing a socioscientific issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(2), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9381-7
- Iversen, E., & Jonsdottir, G. (2019). 'We did see the lapwing' - practising environmental citizenship in upper-secondary science education. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1455075
- Jarvis, P. (2018). Learning to be a person in society. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning (2nd ed.), (pp. 15-28). London: Routledge.
- Jenkins, E. W. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review, 71(256), 43-51.
- Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290363
- Jeon, S. J., Koh, H. Y., Lee, Y. S., & Choi, S. Y. (2017). The needs analysis on science literacy required for Koreans in the future society. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.3.441
- Jho, H., Yoon, H.-G., & Kim, M. (2014). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students' Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea. Science & Education, 23(5), 1131-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z
- Jung, J.-C. (2015). A Meta Analysis of Korean Media Discourse Analysis Method Study. Journal of Speech, Media & Communication Research, 28(9), 297-322.
- Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2017). Secondary School Students' Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 755-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9527-9
- Kerckhoff, A. S., & Reis, G. (2014). Responsible stewards of the earth: Narratives of youth activism in high school (science). In Activist science and technology education, (pp. 465-476). Springer.
- Kim, G., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2020). The Effects of Community-Based Socioscientific Issues Program (SSI-COMM) on Promoting Students' Sense of Place and Character as Citizens. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 18(3), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1
- Kim, J., & Lee, M. (2004). An international comparative study of science curriculum. Journal of the Korean association for science education, 24(6), 1082-1093.
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
- Kolsto, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289714
- Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
- Kung, S.-H. (2016). Understanding Foucault: A Search for Alternative Approaches to Curriculum Studies. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 197-221.
- Kyle Jr, W. C. (1996). Shifting Ideologies and Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1043-1044.
- Lauri, S., & Kyngas, H. (2005). Developing nursing theories. Vantaa, Finland: Werner Soderstrom, Dark Oy.
- Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
- Lee, H. (2018). What is SSI Education?. Seoul: PYMATE.
- Lee, H., Chung, K., & Yoo, J. (2010). Perceptions of Science Teachers in Korea and US on Global Scientific Literacy. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 13(1), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2010.13.1.143
- Lee, H., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: Students' border crossings into a new culture of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 672-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21600
- Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
- Lee, M. K., & Kim, J. H. (2004). An international comparative study of science curriculum. Journal of the Korean association for science education, 24(6), 1082-1093.
- Lee, S. (2018). Exploring an alternative direction for a competence-based curriculum in an age of uncertainty: An" ontological approach. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.36.1.3
- Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562433
- Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public understanding of science, 7, 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
- MOE (Ministry of Education) (2015). 2015 revised Science National Curriculum. Ministry of Education.
- Mun, K., Mun, J., Cho, M., Chung, Y., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Development and Application of 21st Century Scientific Literacy Evaluation Framework on Korean High School Science Text Books. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 789-804. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.5.789
- NILE (National Institute for Lifelong Education) (2020). The public's demand for the national responsibility for promoting lifelong education. National Institute for Lifelong Education.
- National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
- National Science Teachers Association (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states (vol. 1, The Standards). Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers.
- Osborne, J. (2006). Towards a science education for all: The role of ideas, evidence and argument. Paper presented at the ACER Research Conference: Boosting Science Learning -What will it take?
- Ottander, C., & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students' Experience of Working with Socioscientific Issues - a Quantitative Study in Secondary School. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1147-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9238-1
- Park, J. (2016). Discussions about the three aspects of scientific literacy: Focus on integrative understanding, settlement in curriculum, and civic education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.3.0413
- Park, S. H., Choe, S. U., & Kim, C. J. (2020). Elementary Students' Creativity Appear in Small Group Interactions During Model-Based Classrooms on Terraforming. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 40(6), 611-620.
- Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408
- Pella, M. O. (1967). Scientific literacy and the HS curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 67(4), 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1967.tb15185.x
- Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell, K. Appleton, & D. Hanuscin (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 743-794). Routledge.
- Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy. In Linder, C., Ostman, L., Roberts, D. A., Wickman, P. O., Ericksen, G., & MacKinnon, A. (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy, (pp. 11-27).: Routledge.
- Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, S. K. Abell (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II, (pp. 559-572). Routledge.
- Robottom, I. (2012). Socio-scientific issues in education: Innovative practices and contending epistemologies. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x
- Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science education, 88(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
- Rudolph, J. L., & Horibe, S. (2016). What do we mean by science education for civic engagement? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21303
- Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
- Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
- Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp. 355-369): Springer.
- Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
- Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science education, 90(6), 986-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20165
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
- Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Simonneaux, J., & Simonneaux, L. (2012). Educational Configurations for Teaching Environmental Socioscientific Issues Within The Perspective of Sustainability. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9257-y
- Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Socio-scientific reasoning influenced by identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9145-6
- Sjostrom, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Ed.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education, pp. 65-88. Springer.
- Solli, A., Bach, F., & Akerman, B. (2014). Learning to argue as a biotechnologist: disprivileging opposition to genetically modified food. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9528-1
- Song, J., Kang, S. J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ... & Joung, Y. J. (2019). Contents and Features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the Next Generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.465
- Sutter, A. M., Dauer, J. M., Kreuziger, T., Schubert, J., & Forbes, C. T. (2019). Sixth grade students' problematization of and decision-making about a wind energy socio-scientific issue. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 28(3), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1613586
- Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman, S. K. Abell (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II, (pp. 711-740). Routledge.
- Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S. S. (2013). Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21077
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
- Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science education, 86(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008