Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reviewing the Candidate Types for Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures for Post-2020 Management Related to National Protected Areas System

Post-2020 국가 보호지역 시스템 관리를 위한 기타 효과적인 지역 기반 보전 수단(OECMs) 후보지역 유형 검토

  • Shim, Yun-Jin (Dep. of Landscape Architecture, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Sung, Jung-Won (Dep. of Landscape Architecture, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Lee, Kyeong-Cheol (Dep. of Forestry, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Kweon, Hyeong-Keun (Dep. of Forestry, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Hong, Yong-Sik (Korea Arboreta and Gardens Institute) ;
  • Kang, Shin-Gu (Korea Arboreta and Gardens Institute) ;
  • An, Jong-Bin (DMZ Botanic Garden, Korea National Arboretum)
  • 심윤진 (한국농수산대학 조경전공) ;
  • 성정원 (한국농수산대학 조경전공) ;
  • 이경철 (한국농수산대학 산림전공) ;
  • 권형근 (한국농수산대학 산림전공) ;
  • 홍용식 (한국수목원정원관리원) ;
  • 강신구 (한국수목원정원관리원) ;
  • 안종빈 (국립수목원 DMZ산림생물자원보전과)
  • Received : 2022.01.03
  • Accepted : 2022.02.21
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review the candidate types for OECMs suitable for domestic conditions in areas related to the Korea Forest Service in order to achieve the goal of establishing the protected areas and OECMs system required by Post-2020 GBF, and to provide basic data for the establishment of the national protected areas system. As a result of the study, the selection criteria for OECMs were presented, and it was found that arboretums·botanical gardens, Natural Recreation Forests, and air holes may correspond to the Candidate Types for OECMs. As a result of evaluating the possible areas for OECMs based on the OECMs selection criteria, in the case of arboretums·botanical gardens, it is judged that only conservation areas can be designated as OECMs, except for areas mainly used by visitors of arboretums·botanical gardens that fall under the BGCI conservation type among national and public arboretums·botanical gardens. However, private and school arboretums·botanical gardens have personal property ownership, so it was judged to have no effective measures to control activities that may adversely affect biodiversity, which showed limitations in designation of OECMs. Natural Recreation Forests was found to meet the OECMs selection criteria. However, private forests have personal property ownership, which limits the designation of OECMs. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the function of in-situ conservation in order to meet the OECMs for private and school arboretums·botanical gardens, and private forests that have personal property ownership. To this end, effective measures are needed to achieve biodiversity conservation outcomes, and it is judged that legal control and corresponding support policies (incentives) are needed. In the case of air holes, for sustainable conservation, the management boundary of air holes should be clearly defined based on the preparation of laws and guidelines related to air holes. In addition, it is judged that it is desirable to designate the competent local forest office as the management authority and conduct periodic detailed surveys of air holes, establish and implement the conservation plans based on those.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구결과는 국립수목원 위탁연구과제 "GSPC2030에 따른 산림유전자원보호구역 정책 방향 연구"의 지원을 받은 결과입니다.

References

  1. CBD(Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. COP 10 Decision X/2 : Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.
  2. CBD. 2018. Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (Decision 14/8). https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf.
  3. Dudley, N.(Ed.). 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Iucn.
  4. Heo HY and Kwon HG. 2012. Review on the Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Korea. Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 16(4): 41-57. (in Korean with English summary)
  5. Heo HY.Cho DG .Shim YJ .Ryu YJ .Hong JP and Shim GW. 2017. A Study on the Expanding Protected Areas through Identifying Potential Protected Areas. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 31(6): 586-594. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2017.31.6.586
  6. Heo HY. 2020. A Review on the International Trends for Establishing Post-2020 National Targets Relevant to Protected Areas. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 34(6): 601-609. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2020.34.6.601
  7. Hong JP. 2017. A Study on Improving the National Protected Areas System: Focusing on Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures. Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  8. Hong JP .Shim YJ and Heo HY. 2017a. A Study on Aichi Biodiversity Target 11. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(5):43-58. (in Korean with English summary)
  9. Hong JP .Shim YJ and Heo HY. 2017b. Identifying Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures for Expanding National Protected Areas. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(6):79-91. (in Korean with English summary)
  10. IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs. 2019. Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  11. Kang SK. 2012. A study on the classification and management measures of arboreta in Korea. Ph.D. dissertation, Kyungpook National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  12. Kong WS .Lee SG .Yoon KH and Park HN. 2011. Environmental Characteristics of Wind-Hole and Phytogeographical Values. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 20(3): 1-10. (in Korean with English summary)
  13. Kong WS .Yoon KH.Kim IT .Lee YM and Oh SH. 2012. Spatial Distributional Characteristics of Wind-Hole and Governance Strategy. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 21(3): 431-443. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2012.21.3.431
  14. Korea National Arboretum. 2013. Air Holes in Korea. (in Korean)
  15. Laffoley, D. .N. Dudley .H. Jonas .D. MacKinnon .K. MacKinnon .M. Hockings and S. Woodley. 2017. 'An introduction to "other effective area-based conservation measures" under Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity: origin, interpretation and some emerging ocean issues'. Journal of Aquatic Conservation 27(Supplement 1): 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2783
  16. Seo KS. 2012. A Study on Improving the Utilization of Recreational Forest. Ph.D. dissertation, Kangwon National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. Woodley, S. .B. Bertzky .N. Crawhall .N. Dudley .J.M. Londonno .K. MacKinnon .K. Redford and T. Sandwith. 2012. Meeting Aichi Target 11 : What does success look like for protected area system? Parks 18: 23-36.
  18. http://www.kdpa.kr (KOREA Database on Protected Areas)(2021.12.14.)
  19. https://nifos.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?nttId=3145209&bbsId=BBSMSTR_1036&pageUnit=10&pageIndex=3&searchtitle=title&searchcont=&searchkey=&searchwriter=&searchWrd=&ctgryLrcls=&ctgryMdcls=&ctgrySmcls=&ntcStartDt=&ntcEndDt=&mn=NKFS_01_01&orgId=
  20. https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfi/kfs/cms/cmsView.do?mn=NKFS_03_01_01_01&cmsId=FC_001349
  21. https://www.korea.kr/news/pressReleaseView.do?newsId=156389500
  22. https://www.law.go.kr (National Law Information Center)