Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Greenspace on School Commuting Routes on Pedestrian Satisfaction and the Future Direction of Creation

학교통학로 녹지가 보행자의 만족도와 조성 방향에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2021.12.20
  • Accepted : 2022.01.14
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For this study, 313 pedestrians, including students, from two schools participated in the greening project of the school commuting roads in Seoul. These schools were compared to two without street greenspaces to analyze the effects of the green areas on pedestrian satisfaction and the future direction of creation. As a result of the greenspace satisfaction analysis of schools with greenspace, the items that had the greatest effect on overall satisfaction were 'Width of the sidewalk' (37%), 'Harmony with the surrounding landscape' (24.97%), 'The arrangement of trees, grass, and flowers' (18.30%) and 'Overall management' (10.44%). In other words, the item that satisfies most is securing the appropriate width of the sidewalk where the greenspace is located. It is necessary to re-considered creating greenspaces in existing sidewalk spaces and secure a sidewalk width for pedestrian convenience. As a result of the analysis on the direction of greenspace creation, the respondents who experienced greenspaces through the greenspaces on school commuting routes recognized natural features, such as grass and flowers as more important elements as well as noting that landscape and harmony are important. In addition, respondents interested focusing on functionality recognized the need for greenspaces and highly recognized the importance of arranging natural materials, such as trees, grasses, and flowers. This group also recognized the advantages of functionality and the effectiveness of green spaces. Therefore, it is necessary to expand awareness of the effectiveness of greenspaces through environmental education, publicity, and the provision of information boards. More effort will be needed to apply regional and school characteristics rather than uniform composition to the development of greenspaces.

본 연구는 학교통학로 녹지가 보행자의 만족도와 조성 방향에 미치는 영향을 도출하기 위하여, 서울시 학교통학로 녹화사업이 완료된 2개 학교와 가로 녹지가 조성되지 않은 비교 대상지인 2개 학교의 학생을 포함한 보행자 313명을 대상으로 실시한 설문 결과를 분석하였다. 녹지 만족도 분석 결과 녹지가 조성된 학교는 만족도 8개 항목에 대해 모두 만족하였고, 전반적인 만족도에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 항목으로는 '보도의 폭'(37%), '주변 경관과의 조화'(24.97%), '나무나 풀, 꽃의 배치'(18.30%), '전반적인 관리 상태'(10.44%)였다. 즉, 녹지 만족을 영향을 미치는 항목으로는 녹지가 위치하는 보도의 폭(너비)이 적정히 확보되어 보행에 문제가 없어야 하는 기능적 측면에 대해 가장 중요하게 생각하였고 녹지의 세부적 구성 요소보다는 전반적인 경관과의 조화에 대해 더욱 중요하게 인식하고 있었다. 이것은 기존 보도에 녹지를 조성하는 현재 사업 형태에 대한 재검토가 필요하며, 보행 편의성을 위한 보도폭의 확보가 가로녹지 조성 사업 시 가장 중점적으로 고려해야 할 사항임을 나타낸다. 녹지 조성 방향에 대한 인식 차이를 분석하면, 학교통학로 녹화사업을 통하여 가로녹지에 대한 경험을 한 응답자는 풀과 꽃 등 자연 소재에 대해 더욱 중요하게 인식하고 경관과 조화에 대해 중요하게 생각하였다. 녹지에 대한 관심도가 높고 필요성을 높게 인식하는 응답자 또한 나무와 풀, 꽃 등을 조성하는 등 자연 소재의 배치에 대해 중요하다고 인식하고 있었다. 또한 녹지의 기능성과 효과성에 대한 장점을 인지하는 그룹이 녹지 만족도가 높았다. 따라서 녹지 만족도를 향상하기 위해서는 녹지 효과성에 대한 환경 교육과 홍보, 안내판 조성 등을 통하여 효과성에 대한 인식을 확대할 필요가 있다. 또한 획일적 형태보다는 지역과 학교 특성을 반영하는 등의 노력이 더욱 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 서울기술연구원 연구사업의 지원(대기오염 차단과 열 저감을 위한 학교통학로 식재방안)에 의하여 수행된 내용입니다.

References

  1. Byon, H. O.(2009) Design of Street Greenery for the Landscape Specialization and Increase of Green Volume on Street in Seoul. University of Seoul Graduate School Dissertation for the Degree of Master. pp. 136 (in Korean with English abstract).
  2. Cho, Y. K., J. H. Yang and S. W. Woo(2009) A study on the analysis of between users and merchants satisfaction factors in the after street. Environment Improvement Project 10(3): 89-106.
  3. Choi, S. H., Y. H. Lee and Y. J. Lee(2019) The effects of school forests on mental health and cognition of elementary students. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 108(4): 655-662. https://doi.org/10.14578/JKFS.2019.108.4.655
  4. Chosun Biz(2021) Expanding the Use of the Park due to COVID-19. Resolving the "park area difference" by Region is a Problem. 2021.04.16.
  5. Frumkin, H., L. D. Frank and R. Jackson(2004) Urban Sprawl and PublicHealth: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  6. Han, B. H.(1995) A Study on Analysis of thr Phyological GrowthCondition and Improvement of Street Trees in Seoul. Universityof Seoul Graduate School Dissertation for the Degree of Master.
  7. Han, B. H., J. I. Kwak and H. S. Kim(2013) Influence factors of street environment for provision and management of street green. KoreanJournal of Environment and Ecology 27(2): 253-265.
  8. Hartig T., F. G. Kaiser and P. A. Bowler(1997) Further Development of a Measure of Perceived Environmental Restorativeness. Goteborg:Department of Psychology, Goteborg University.
  9. Jang, C. K., S. G. Jung, J. S. Jang, K. T. Kim, and J. H. Oh (2009)The direction of school forest plans considering satisfactionof elementary students. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(4): 42-51.
  10. Jeong, K. J.(2014) A Study on Citizenship and Maintenance Planfor Urban Road Garden: Monitoring the Pilot Site of the Street Gardenin Seoul., The Seoul Institute.
  11. Jeong, S. H.(1998) Trends in overseas cases of school landscaping. Landscape Architecture Korea 127: 54-58.
  12. Kim, I. H.(2007) Improvement plans of school forest for eco-school-focused on the school forest project led by the government-. J. KIEF 14(1): 121-129.
  13. Kim, J. H., S. H. Lee and Y. H. Yoon(2018) A comparative studyonteacher-student perception of forest function in elementary school. Journal of Environmental Science International 27(7): 519-529. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2018.27.7.519
  14. Kim, Y. S., S. Y. Kang and K. C. Kwon(1997) Identity of street areafor urban amenity development. Journal of the Korean Institute of traditional Landscape Architecture 16(1):121-130.
  15. Kim, W. Ju, J., Heo, W. S. Kang and H. Yoon(2020) Analysis and Diagnosis of the Linear Park Project through Urban Regeneration in Seoul. The Seoul Institute Report.
  16. Kim, M. K.(2020) Development of an Evaluation Model to Select Street Trees in Seoul. Seoul Institute of Technology Report.
  17. Kim, M. K.(2021) A Planting Plan on School Commutes for Reducing and Urban Heat. Seoul Institute of Technology Report.
  18. Kuk, J. H., Y. H. Yoon, B. J. Park and W. T. Kim(2008) Effects of school forest on satisfaction with greenspace and environmental education.-focused on elementary school teachers. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 11(4): 68-66.
  19. Kwon, H. S., Y. K. Hahm, H. R. Kim and H. Y. Yoon(2017) The effect of street gardens on psychological restoration. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 45(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.1.035
  20. Lee, G. M., W. S. Lee, S. G. Jung and C. K. Jang(2016) The influence of pedestrian environment perception on pedestrian environment satisfaction and expected health promotion effects - Focused on park user for health promotion. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(6): 137-147. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.6.137
  21. Lee, K. Y.(2021) A Study of the Physical Environment Characteristics of Streetscapes Affecting Pedestrian Satisfaction: Using Machine Learning and Computer Vision Techniques. Hanyang University Graduate School Dissertation for the Degree of Master.
  22. Lee, S. G., J. S. Jang, S. G. Jung and J. H. You(2009) An analysis of satisfaction with school forest using triangular fuzzy number. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(3): 1-10.
  23. Lee, S. H.(1997) Greenspace Expansion for Green Network in Seoul, Seoul: Seoul Development Institute.
  24. Lee, Y., J. Suh and S. Kim(2019) An analysis of satisfaction by space elements in greenway. J. Recreation and Landscape 13(1): 33-45.
  25. Lee, H. J. and U. S. Yoo(2015) A study on satisfaction of pedestrian envoroment of urban linear park. Journal of the Architectureal Institutute of Korea Planning Design 31(2): 49-58.
  26. O'Brien, L. and R. Murray(2007) Forest school and its impacts on young children: Case studies in britain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6: 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.03.006
  27. Park. K. H., J. W. Park, S. G. Jung and J. H. You(2007) Developingthe evaluation indicator of pedestrian environment for promotingwalking activity. Journal of Environmental Science International 6(11): 1231-1238.
  28. Seoul Information Planning Center(2017) Parks and Green Spaces in Seoul? Seoul Information Planning Center Report.
  29. Seoul Institute(2017) Seoul and Big Cities around the World. Seoul Institute Report.
  30. Seoul Institute(2019) Seoul and Big Cities around the World. Seoul Institute Report.
  31. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2019) 2020 School Road Green Project Plan. Seoul Metropolitan Government.
  32. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2019) Complete Report of CElementary Greening Construction.
  33. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2019) Complete Report of MElementary Greening Construction.
  34. Seo, E. H.(2010) Statistical Analysis Using SPSS 18.0. Free Academy.
  35. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education(2020) 2020 Seoul Educational Statistics.
  36. Shin, W. S.(1994) The influence of past experience levels on attitudes toward environment and park management. Journal of Korean Forest Society 83(3): 344-356.
  37. Stankey, G. H.(1973) Visitor Perception of Wilderness RecreationCarrying Capacity. USDA Forest Service Res. Pap. INT-142.
  38. Yoon, Y. H., W. T. Kim(2004) A study on the field survey of plant species of elementary school -the case study on 10 elementary schools in Chungju city-. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 7(6): 1-11.
  39. Young, R. A.(1978) An Analysis of Wilderness Concepts and Values. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana. IL.
  40. Faculty of Public Health(2010). Great Outdoors: Howour Natural Health Service Uses Greenspace to Improve Wellbeing. Available at:http://www.fph.org.uk/uploads/r_great_outdoors.pdf[Accessed09/07/2017].