DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Knowledge Visualization and Mapping of Studies on Social Systems Theory in Social Sciences: Focused on Niklas Luhmann

사회과학 분야 사회적 체계 이론 연구의 지식 시각화와 매핑 - Niklas Luhmann을 중심으로 -

  • 박성우 (광주대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 홍소람 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.20
  • Accepted : 2022.02.13
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

Niklas Luhmann is one of the most contentious and difficult theorist in sociology but follow-up studies on his theory gradually increase for recent 10 years. The purpose of this study is to observe how follow-up studies use the difficult concepts of Luhmann. Unlike previous studies, this study adopted a keyword rather than an article as the unit of analysis because keywords are linguistic constructs that can make concepts observable. The study analyzed co-occurrence of keywords in 139 articles retrieved from social sciences category in Web of Science DB. The key findings were following: the most important keywords were the name of Luhmann(Niklas Luhmann) and theory(social systems); keywords were grouped into 4 clusters(social systems theory, systems theory, legal system and political system, the significant of Luhmann's theory from the viewpoint of the history of social theory); topic terms were systems theory, communication, Autopoiesis, risk, legal system, functional differentiation, environment, social theory, sociological theory, structural coupling, systems and evolution. The significance of the study is following: the study gives keywords as useful access point for beginners of Luhmann's theory; the study proves that content analysis by keywords network can be applied to trend analysis of difficult theoretical researches.

Niklas Luhmann은 사회학 이론가들 중 가장 논쟁적이고 난해한 학자이면서 동시에 근 10년간 후속연구가 증가하고 있는 학자이다. 이 연구의 목적은 Luhmann의 후속연구들이 Luhmann의 난해한 개념을 어떻게 사용하고 있는지를 관찰하는 것이다. 이 연구는 선행연구와 달리 분석의 단위를 논문이 아니라 키워드로 채택하였다. 키워드는 개념을 관찰 가능하게 만드는 언어적 구성물이기 때문이다. Web of Science의 검색결과 나온 139편의 사회과학 분야 논문의 키워드를 동시출현빈도 분석하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가장 중요한 키워드가 Luhmann의 이름과 이론의 이름이었다. 둘째, 클러스터링은 사회적 체계 이론, 일반체계이론, 법 체계와 정치체계, Luhmann 이론의 사회이론적 의의 등 4가지로 묶였다. 셋째, 핵심어가 'systems theory(일반체계이론)', 'communication(소통)', 'Autopoiesis(자기생산)', 'risk(위험)', 'legal system(법 체계)', 'functional differentiation(기능적 분화)', 'environment(환경)', 'social theory(사회적 이론)', 'sociological theory(사회학적 이론)', 'structural coupling(구조적 연결)', 'systems(체계들)', 'evolution(진화)'로 도출되었다. 이 연구의 의의는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 핵심어를 도출해내 Luhmann의 이론을 처음 접근하는 사람들에게 유용한 접근점을 제공하였다. 둘째, 난해한 이론적 연구의 동향 분석에도 키워드 네트워크를 통한 내용분석이 가능함을 증명하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2022년 광주대학교 대학연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었음.

References

  1. Kim, J. (2014). Study on Niklas Luhmann in Korea: Research trends, issues, and challenges. Society and Theory, 25, 111-152. https://doi.org/10.17209/st.2014.11.25.111
  2. Lee, S. (2012). Network Analysis Methodology. Seoul: Nonhyung.
  3. Lee, S. (2018). Network Analysis Methods Applications and Limitations. Seoul: crbooks.
  4. Lee, C. (2010). Luhmann's autopoietic system concept and its significance from the viewpoint of the history of social theories. Discourse 201, 13(3), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.17789/discou.2010.13.3.004
  5. Lee, C. (2019). Translator's Prologue. in: Gripp-Hagelstange, H. (2016). Niklas Luhmann - eine erkenntnistheoretische Einfuhrung. Translated by Lee, C (2019). Niklas Luhmann - Epistemological Introduce. Seoul: Theory Publishing.
  6. Hyun, Y. K. (2021) How is the self-description of modern society possible?: sociological reflection in Niklas Luhmann's systems theory. Korean Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.21562/kjs.2021.08.55.3.1
  7. Bang, C. C. (2015). Information systems frontiers: keyword analysis and classification. Information Systems Frontiers, 17, 217-237, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9544-z
  8. Baraldi, C., Corsi, G., & Esposito, E. (2021). Unloking Luhmann. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University Press.
  9. Benton, T. & Craib, I. (2010). Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Educations of Social Thought (Second Edition). 이기홍 옮김 (2014). 사회과학의 철학: 사회사상의 철학적 기초 (제2판). 서울: 한울아카데미.
  10. Bigliardi, B. & Filippelli, S. (2021). Investigating circular business model innovation through keywords analysis. Sustainability, 13, 5036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095036
  11. Chae, C., Yim, J., Lee, J., Jo, S., & Oh, J. (2020). The bibliometric keywords network analysis of human resource management research trends: the case of Human Resource Management Journals in South Korea. Sustainability, 12, 5700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145700
  12. Choi, J., Yi, S., & Lee, K. (2011). Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Information & Management, 48, 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.09.004
  13. Dai, S., Duan, X., & Zhang, W. (2020). Knowledge map of environmental crisis management based on knowledge network and co-word analysis, 2005-2018. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121168
  14. Gonzalez, L., Garcia-Masso, X., Pardo-Ibanez, A., Peset, F., & Devis-Devis, J. (2018). An author keyword analysis for mapping Sport Sciences. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201435
  15. Gorzen-Mitka, I., Bilska, B., Tomaszewska, M., & Kolozyn-Krajewska, D. (2020). Mapping the structure of Food Waste Management Research: a co-keyword analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 4798. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134798
  16. Gripp-Hagelstange, H. (2016). Niklas Luhmann - eine erkenntnistheoretische Einfuhrung. 이철 역 (2019). 니클라스 루만 - 인식론적 입문. 서울: 이론출판.
  17. Kim, W., Khan, G., Wood, J., & Mahmood, M. T. (2016). Employee engagement for sustainable organizations: keyword analysis using social network analysis and burst detection approach. Sustainability, 8, 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070631
  18. Kiran, S. (2021). Occupational health could be the new normal challenge in the trade and health cycle: keywords analysis between 1990 and 2020. Safety and Health at Work, 12, 272-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.11.003
  19. Luhmann, N. (1981). Soziologische Aufklarung 3: Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organization. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. 재인용: 김종길(2014). 국내 인문.사회과학계의 니클라스 루만 연구: 수용 추이, 현황 및 과제. 사회와 이론, 25, 115.
  20. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss Einer Allgemeinen Theorie. 이철, 박여성 옮김(2020). 사회적 체계들: 일반이론의 개요. 파주: 한길사.
  21. Min, K., Yoon, M., & Furuya, K. (2019). A comparison of a smart city's trends in urban planning before and after 2016 through keyword network analysis. Sustainability, 11, 3155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113155
  22. Mrvar, A. [n.d.] Network Analysis Using Pajek: Centrality and Prestige. Available: http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/sola/info4/uvod/part4.pdf
  23. Park, J. & Jeong, E. (2019). Service quality in tourism: a systematic literature review and keyword network analysis. Sustainability, 11, 3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133665
  24. Peter, R. S., Brehme, T., Volzke, H., Muche, R., Rothenbacher, D., & Buchele, G. (2016). Epidemiologic research topics in Germany: a keyword network analysis of 2014 DGEpi conference presentations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 635-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0141-y
  25. Reese-Schafer, Walter (1992). Luhmann zur Einfuhrung. 이남복 역(2002). 니클라스 루만의 사회사상. 서울: 백의.
  26. Schodlb, K., Kleina, F., & Winckler, C. (2017). Mapping sustainability in pig farming research using keyword network analysis. Livestsock Science, 196, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.005
  27. Sohn, Y. J. (2020). 40 years of Luhmann's legacy in the anglophone academic community. International Review of Sociology. 30(3), 469-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2020.1853005
  28. van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  29. Viskovatoff, A. (1999). Foundations of Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems. Philosphy of the Social Sciences, 29(4), 481-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319902900402
  30. Yang, K., Wang, L., Yang, G., & Jiang, X. (2021). Research hotspots and trends in nursing education from 2014 to 2020 A co-word analysis based on keywords. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 00, 1-12.
  31. Yoon, Y., Zo, H., Choi, M., Lee, D., & Lee, H. (2018). Exploring the dynamic knowledge structure of studies on the Internet of things Keyword analysis. ETRI Journal, 40(6), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2018-0059
  32. Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Yu, B. & Zhao, L. (2015). Knowledge map of creativity research based on keywords network and co-word analysis: 1992-2011. Qual Quant, 49, 1023-1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0032-9