DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Needs Analysis for the Reference Service Model and Guidelines at the National Level: A Focus on the National Library of Korea Case

국가적 수준의 참고정보서비스 모형 및 가이드라인 요구분석 사례 연구 - 국립중앙도서관을 중심으로 -

  • 채현수 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 전정현 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이지연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.20
  • Accepted : 2022.02.13
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

The study aims to derive major factors from the results of needs analysis to develop the reference service model and guidelines at the national level. The literature review and case study enabled investigation of the considerations to develop the reference service model and guidelines. The Needs Analysis revealed librarians' and users' needs about the reference service. The major factors and implications derived from the analysis suggest the directions of the National-level reference service model and guidelines development process. This study has significance because it presented the implications and the development process of the reference service model and guidelines for domestic libraries, and directly contributed to the development of the reference service model and guidelines for the National Library of Korea.

본 연구는 국가적 수준의 참고정보서비스 모형 및 가이드라인 개발을 위하여 실무자 및 이용자의 요구를 파악하고 분석한 결과를 종합하여 주요 요인을 도출하는 것에 목적이 있다. 문헌 및 사례 조사를 통해 참고정보서비스 모형과 가이드라인 개발을 위해 고려해야 할 사항들을 탐색하였고, 이를 바탕으로 실무자와 이용자를 대상으로 참고정보서비스 관련 요구를 파악하고 분석하였다. 요구분석을 통해 주요 요인과 시사점을 도출하였고, 국가적 수준 참고정보서비스 모형 및 가이드라인 개발을 위한 방향성도 제언하였다. 본 연구는 국내 도서관들이 참고할 수 있는 참고정보서비스 모형 및 가이드라인 관련 주요 시사점과 개발 프로세스를 제시하였을 뿐만 아니라, 국가대표도서관인 국립중앙도서관의 참고정보서비스 모형 및 가이드라인 개발에도 직접적으로 기여하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Wang-Jong & Lee, Jae-Whoan (2016). Development and management of CDRS in Korean library community. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.69
  2. Libraries Act. Act No. 17706.
  3. Park, Ok Nam, Lee, Jeong-Mee, Bae, Kyung-Jae, & Cha, Sung-Jong (2017). A study on future direction and improvement of services for National Library of Korea. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 28(4), 269-299. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2017.28.4.269
  4. Park, Jong-Do (2015). Literature review of queston taxonomy for developing user-participatory reference service. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.401
  5. Park, Hee-Jin & Park, Sung Jae (2013). A study on the digital reference service using electronic bulletin boards in academic libraries through Content Analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.175
  6. Lee, Yong-Jae (2000). A study on improvement of the 'subjectized reference services' in Korean University Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 34(2), 69-86.
  7. Chang, Hye Ran & Yi, Kyung Suk (2014). Question analysis of the collaborative digital reference service at the National Library of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.007
  8. Korean Society For Library And Information Science ed. (2013). Understanding of Modern Library and Information Science. Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  9. Hwang, Myun & Jeong, Dong Youl (2016). A study on the factors affecting the satisfaction of collaborative digital reference service users. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(3), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.133
  10. Agosto, D. E., Rozaklis, L., MacDonald, C., & Abels, E. G. (2011). A model of the reference and information service process: an educators' perspective. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(3), 235-44. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.50n3.235
  11. American Library Association (2008a). Reference and User Services Guideline Links by Topic. Available: https://www.ala.org/rusa/documents-topic-standards-guidelines-and-recommendations
  12. American Library Association (2008b). Definitions of Reference. Available: http://www.ala.org/rusa/guidelines/definitionsreference
  13. Australian Library and Information Association (2016). Guidelines, standards and outcome measures for Australian public libraries. Available: https://read.alia.org.au/guidelines-standards-and-outcome-measures-australian-public-libraries-july-2016
  14. IFLA (2014). IFLA Digital Reference Guidelines. Available: https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/719
  15. Mavodza, J. (2019). Interpreting library chat reference service transactions. The Reference Librarian, 60(2), 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2019.1572571
  16. Mu, X., Dimitroff, A., Jordan, J., & Burclaff, N. (2011). A survey and empirical study of virtual reference service in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(2), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.003
  17. Rothstein. S. (1953). The development of the concept of reference service in American libraries, 1850-1900. Library Quarterly, 23(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1086/617934
  18. Tyckoson, D. A. (2001). What is the best model of reference service?. Library Trends, 50(2), 183-196.