DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

노인 여가 가치관 평가도구 문항 도출: 델파이 조사를 바탕으로

Deriving Questions on the Evaluation Tools of Leisure Values for Senior Citizens: Based on the Delphi Survey

  • 박다솔 (전주기전대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 유은영 (연세대학교 소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박지혁 (연세대학교 소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 홍익표 (연세대학교 소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김정란 (가톨릭관동대학교 치매서비스재활학과) ;
  • 박혜연 (연세대학교 소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 작업치료학과)
  • Park, Da Sol (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Jeonju Kijeon College) ;
  • Yoo, Eun Young (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hyuk (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hong, Ickpyo (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Ran (Dept. of Dementia Prevention and Rehabilitation, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Park, Hae Yean (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.20
  • 심사 : 2021.08.11
  • 발행 : 2022.02.28

초록

목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 '노인 여가 가치관 평가도구'의 문항 도출을 위하여 노인 작업치료 경험이 있는 작업치료사 및 노인 작업치료에 대한 전문적 견해를 가진 자를 대상으로 델파이 조사를 시행하는 것이다. 연구방법 : 본 연구는 노인 여가 가치관 평가도구의 문항 도출을 위하여 총 두 단계로 시행되었으며 첫 번째 단계는 예비문항 수집, 두 번째 단계는 델파이 조사가 시행되었다. 예비문항 수집 단계에서는 문헌 고찰과 2019 국민여가활동 조사 분석이 시행되었다. 델파이 조사의 수정 델파이 기법으로 총 2차에 걸쳐 시행되었다. 결과 : 예비문항 수집 단계에서 선별된 여가 가치관 평가문항은 39개, 참여 여가활동 목록은 45개였다. 이후 전문가 집단 25명을 대상으로 델파이 조사를 실시한 결과 여가 가치관 평가문항 38개와 참여여가활동 목록 45개를 도출하였다. 결론 : 본 연구에서 도출된 문항은 노인이 여가활동에 참여할 때 중요하게 생각하는 다양한 가치를 파악할 수 있고 구체적으로 참여하는 여가활동을 파악할 수 있다는 점에 그 의의가 있다.

Objective : This study aimed to conduct a Delphi survey of occupational therapists with experience in elderly occupational therapy to derive items about the 'Elder Leisure Value Assessment Tool'. Methods : This study was conducted in two stages. The first stage was the collection of preliminary questions, and the second stage was the Delphi survey. In the first stage, a literature review and analysis of the 2019 National Leisure Activity Survey were conducted. The modified Delphi technique of the Delphi investigation was implemented in two rounds. Results : In the preliminary item collection phase, 39 items were selected for leisure value assessment and 45 were listed for the participating leisure activities. Subsequently, a Delphi survey of 25 professional groups resulted in 38 leisure value assessment items and 45 participating leisure activities. Conclusion : The questions drawn from this study are meaningful because they can identify specific leisure activities that the elderly participate in, as well as the various values that the elderly consider important when participating in such activities

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2021S1A3A2A02096338).

참고문헌

  1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd edition). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl.1), S1-S48. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
  2. Auger, D. (2016). The diverse meanings of leisure. Society and Leisure, 39(2), 173-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2016.1198599
  3. Beard, J. G., & Ragheb, M. G. (1983). Measuring leisure motivation. Journal of Leisure Research, 15(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1983.11969557
  4. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (1998). Positive moods derived from leisure and their relationship to happiness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(3), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00082-8
  5. Hong, S. P., & Lee, J. Y. (2010). Time use of areas of occupation according to the periods of life in Koreans. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(1), 95-106.
  6. Hwang, S. H., & Seo, H. J. (2009). Relationships among leisure constraints, leisure constraints negotiation, and serious leisure. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 20(2), 298-307. https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2009.20.2.298
  7. Im, E. A., Son, K. C., & Kam, J. K. (2012). Development of elements of Horticultural Therapy Evaluation Indices (HTEI) through Delphi method. Horticultural Science & Technology, 30(3), 308-324. https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2012.12037
  8. Jeong, E. H., & Park, J. H. (2018). A systematic study on the leisure assessment tool for the elderly. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(3), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2018.26.3.04
  9. Kang, H. M. (2000). The relationship between reasons for participation and level of career experience in participation of masters swimming clubs as serious leisure. Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport, 13(1), 1-12.
  10. Kelly, J. R., & Freysinger, V. J. (2000). 21st century leisure: Current issues. Allyn & Bacon.
  11. Kim, C. L. (2020). A study on how to activate leisure programs -Focus on elderly leisure program. The Korean Academic Society of Welfare Management, 7(1), 265-288.
  12. Kim, J. S. (2018). The development of global leisure meaning scale for Korean immigrants. Journal of Leisure Studies, 16(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22879/slos.2018.16.1.1
  13. Kim, M. L. (2009). Development for Serious Leisure Scale (SLS). The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 48(4), 397-408.
  14. Kim, M. S., & Ko, J. W. (2013). The effect of the elderly's leasure activity on their health and the mediating role of family support. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare, 60, 35-54. https://doi.org/10.21194/kjgsw..60.201306.35
  15. Kim, Y. G. (2013). A study on the physical, social, and leisure-welfare factors in the quality of life for the aged (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul Christian University, Seoul.
  16. Kim, Y. S., & Ha, W. Y. (2015). A study of the effect of participation in productive leisure activities on the suicide ideation and physical and mental health of elderly living alone. Health and Social Welfare Review, 35(4), 344-374. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2015.35.4.344
  17. Kraaykamp, G., & Van Eijck, K. (2005). Personality, media preferences, and cultural participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1675-1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.002
  18. Lee, G. H., & Lee, H. J. (2016). A study on developmental direction of leisure activity for elderly in the occupational therapy perspectives. The Journal of Occupational Therapy for the Aged and Dementia, 10(1), 7-16.
  19. Lee, M. H., Park, Y. R., Lee, K. R., & Um, K. W. (2014). An exploratory study on design of an assessment tool for leisure tendency of older adults. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare, 65, 159-184. https://doi.org/10.21194/kjgsw..65.201409.159
  20. Lee, Y. J. (2005). Korean football supporters culture as serious leisure. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 44(2), 553-563.
  21. Martinez-Rodriguez, S., Iraurgi, I., Gomez-Marroquin, I., Carrasco, M., Ortiz-Marques, N., & Stevens, A. B. (2016). Psychometric properties of the leisure time satisfaction scale in family caregivers. Psicothema, 28(2), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.278
  22. Melamed, S., Meir, E. I., & Samson, A. (1995). The benefits of personality-leisure congruence: Evidence and implications. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1995.11969975
  23. Ministry of Culture.Sports and Tourism. (2019). 2019 National Leisure Activity Survey. Sejong, Korea. https://mcst.go.kr
  24. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2011). Strategies for responding to the age of 100 years of life. Policy report of the Forum on Low Fertility and Aged Society compared to the age of 100 years. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. http://repository.kihasa.re.kr
  25. Molanorouzi, K., Khoo, S., & Morris, T. (2014). Validating the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS). BMC Public Health, 14(1), 909. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-909
  26. Murry Jr, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
  27. National Institute of Korean Language. (2014). Standard Korean dictionary. Human Culture Arirang.
  28. Nizzero, A., Cote, P., & Cramm, H. (2017). Occupational disruption: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1306791
  29. Noh, Y. G. (2006). Leisure Studies. Daekyungbooks.
  30. Park, D. S., Shin, G. I., Lee, H. S., & Park, H. Y. (2020). Qualitative assessment tools of leisure activities for the elderly: Convergence study. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(6), 433-440. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.6.433
  31. Park, E. H. (2016). Mediating effects of ego-integrity on the relationship between leisure activity of elders and successful aging-Focused using senior welfare center (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul Christian University, Seoul.
  32. Park, J. H., Lee, J. H., & Choi, S. O. (2001). Prediction of diagnosis of dementia using Cognitive Impairment Diagnosing Instrument (CIDI). Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 40(2), 253-259.
  33. Park, K. H., & Kim, D. K. (2013). Analyzing elderly's leisure to improve the quality of life in the era of 100 aging society in Korea: Series 1. Analyzing elderly's leisure repertoire. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 25(6), 85-104.
  34. Park, S. J. (2004). Development and validation of the Serious Leisure Sports Experience Scale (SLSES). Journal of Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport, 17(1), 33-45.
  35. Yeo, J. E. (2016). Exploring of formation process for leisure values of university students. Journal of Leisure Studies, 14(2), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.22879/SLOS.2016.14.2.37
  36. Yoon, H. J. (2016). Exploratory study on the perception of leisure and aging well in older Korean adults. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 28(7), 201-221.
  37. Yoon, I. A., & Yoon, Y. J. (2010). Exploring leisure policy for effective leisure participation for the elderly. Journal of Korean Leisure Sciences, 1(1), 11-17.
  38. Yoon, S. Y. (2013). Basic study on the development of leisure happiness index. Korea Culture and Tourism Institute.