DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Productivity Changes of the Korean Container Shipping Lines using MPI

MPI를 활용한 국적 외항 컨테이너 선사의 생산성 변화 분석 연구

  • Sung Sub, Shin (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Chi Yeol, Kim (Major in Maritime Information and Finance, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Min-Ho, Ha (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University)
  • 신성섭 (인천대학교) ;
  • 김치열 (한국해양대학교 해양정보.금융전공) ;
  • 하민호 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원)
  • Received : 2022.12.13
  • Accepted : 2022.12.14
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

This study analyzed the changes in the operational productivity of fourteen Korean container lines from 2019 to 2021 using MP I(Malmquist Productivity Index). The results indicated that the operational productivity of the shipping companies has increased by 38.4% annually, representing the TCI (Technical Change Index) increasing by 58.3% and the TECI (Technical Efficiency Change Index) decreasing by 12.6%. The increase in the operational productivity of the container shipping lines was mainly attributed to the high rise in ocean freight rates rather than an increase in fleet size or ship technical efficiency. However, the deep-sea shipping lines (i.e. HMM and SM lines) experienced increases in both the TCI and TECI, which was not the case for other shipping lines(i.e. Intra-Asian short-sea shipping lines). The intra-Asian short-sea shipping lines enhance their productivity due to the TCI but failed to appreciate the cost savings of the increased fleet effects due to the low SECI(Scale Efficiency Change Index) values.

본연구는 2019~2021년 14개 국적 외항 컨테이너 선사의 생산성 변화를 MPI(Malmquist Productivity Index)를 통해 분석하였다. 분석 기간 14개 선사의 MPI는 연평균 38.4% 증가한 것으로 분석되었다. MPI 변화 원인을 살펴보면, TCI(Technical Change Index)는 연평균 58.3% 증가하였으나 TECI(Technical Efficiency Change Index)는 연평균 12.6% 감소한 것으로 나타났다. 이는 선박의 효율성 또는 선대 규모 확대 효과보다는 운임상승에 의한 생산성 향상이 주원인임을 의미한다. 원양 해운선사인 HMM과 SM상선은 타 선사(아시아 역내 선사)와 달리 TECI와 TCI가 모두 생산성 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 미친 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 아시아 역내 선사의 경우 TCI(i.e. 운임상승) 값의 증가에 의한 생산성 향상이며, TECI값 중 SECI(Scale Effieicency Change Index) 값이 낮아 이들 선사는 선대 규모(규모의 경제) 변경에 따른 비용 절감 효과를 거의 누리지 못한 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bai, X., Cho H. S. and Fan, R.(2019). "Analyzing Performance of Korean and Chinese Shipping Companies Based on Malmquist Productivity Index", Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.37059/TJOSAL.2019.35.1.1
  2. Chang, D. S. and Park, H. G.(2013). "Measurement of Efficiency in Regional Logistics Service", Journal of Industrial Economics and Business (JIEB), Vol. 26, No. 1, pp, 371-372.
  3. Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, Norris, M. and Zhang, Z.(1994). "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries", American Economic Review, Vol. 84 No.1, 1994, pp. 66-83.
  4. Gai, Y. T. and Koo, J. S.(2017). "Analysis of efficiency and productivity of the Korean, Chinese, and Japanese shipping companies using the DEA method and Malmquist index", Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 33, No. 95, pp. 411-432. https://doi.org/10.37059/tjosal.2017.33..411
  5. Ha, M. H.(2022a). "A Study on the Market Concentration Analysis of Korean Ocean-going Shipping Companies", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 351-358.
  6. Ha, M. H.(2022b). "A Study on the Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Korean Container Shipping Lines using DEA and MPI", Journal of Maritime Business, Vol. 52, pp. 155-178.
  7. Hwang, K. Y., Sung, B. S. and Song, W. Y.(2012). "A DEA and Malmquist Index Approach to Measuring Productivity and Efficiency of Korean's Shipping Firms", International Commerce and Information Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 321-348. https://doi.org/10.15798/kaici.14.3.201209.321
  8. ISL(2022), Shipping Statistics Yearbook, Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics, Germany.
  9. Kang, H. W.(2021). "A Study on the Efficiency of Logistics Industry : Focusing on Shipping Companies", Korea International Commercial Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 259-277. https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2021.36.4.259
  10. Kang, S. H., Nam J. W., Sim, M. S. and Kim, Y. S.(2021). "A Study on the Productivity and Efficiency Comparative Analysis of Container Terminal in Busan New Port", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 138-147.
  11. Kook, W. K.(2013), "A Empirical Study on the Efficiency and Productivity of Logistics Firms using DEA and Malmquist", Korea Logistics Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.29-49.
  12. Lee, S. H. and Kim, J. Y.(2018). "Static and Dynamic Efficiency Analysis of Korean Shipping and Airline Companies using DEA", Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 397-417.
  13. Malmquist, S.(1953). "Index numbers and indifference surfaces", Trabajos de estadistica, Vol 4 No. 2, pp. 209-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03006863
  14. Ministries of Korean Government.,(2021), Leaping Beyond Shipping Reconstruction to a Shipping Powerhouse, 36 major economic achievements of the Moon Jae-In's government, Seoul.
  15. Park, M. H.(2008). "Development of DEA Efficiency and Malmquist Productivity Analysis System", Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 241-265.
  16. Park H. H. and Kim, T. H.(2020). "Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of Korean's Coastal Port Freight Transportation Business", Journal of Global Trade & Management, Vol. 20, pp. 23-41.
  17. Repository of Korea's Corporate Fillings, An electronic disclosure system, https://www.dart.fss.or.kr
  18. Sarkis, J.(2007). Preparing Your Data for DEA. In: Zhu, J., Cook, W.D.(eds) Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA.
  19. Yip, T. L., Lun, Y. V. and Lau, Y. Y.(2012), "Scale diseconomies and efficiencies of liner shipping", Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 673-683. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.738315